|
RESOLUTION Nš 4/84 CASE
7848 PARAGUAY May 17, 1984 BACKGROUND:
1. In a letter
dated June 26, 1981, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
received the following petition: On
Wednesday, on the 24th day of this month, according to information that
reached us from several sources, Mr. Luis Alfonso Resck, the President
of the Christian Democratic Party and one of the coordinating officers
of the National Agreement opposition coalition, was arrested in his
house in Asuncion, Paraguay. Mr.
Resck was returning to his house after a regular meeting of the National
Agreement coordination officers, and as he was about to enter it, he was
intercepted by four men dressed in civilian clothing. His wife was
present and asked the officials for the arrest order. They told her
brusquely that there was no order and that she ought to keep quiet and
not create problems. Mr. Resck did not resist the detention but before
leaving he told his wife not to bring food to the jail because he
intended to begin a hunger strike in protest of the illegal detention. Luis
Alfonso Resck is an educator by profession, known in the country for his
severe criticism of the passive education system that deprives the
students of all choice of independent thought. He has also been a
political leader for many years and has a long history of being arrested
and tortured. On one occasion which he denounced publicly, the torture
left him with a crushed testicle. We
request you and the Commission do everything possible to secure his
freedom and to request (as he will certainly want) a legal proceeding in
the case in which there are charges against him. 2. In a cable
dated that same day, June 26, 1981, the Commission transmitted to the
Government the pertinent parts of the petition and requested all
information that was deemed appropriate and stated that, in accordance
with Article 31 of the Regulations of the Commission, the request for
information did not constitute a prejudgment with regard to the decision
on the admissibility of the petition. 3. On June 31,
1981, the Government of Paraguay replied to the request for information
made by the Commission in the following terms: Luis
Alfonso Resck was detained under the authority of Article 79 of the
National Constitution (state of siege). He was located at the Department
of Police Investigations of the capital city while being interrogated
with regard to a declaration considered injurious and subversive by the
government, published under his signature as the President of the
so-called Christian Democratic Party. This party is not recognized by
the Central Electoral Board because it has not complied with the first
requirement set by the present elections law for recognition: a list of
10,000 registered members. Resck chose to go abroad. Since Saturday,
June 27, he has been in the town of Clorinda, the Argentine Republic. 4. In a note dated
July 10, 1981, the pertinent parts of the Government's reply were
transmitted to the petitioner who in turn replied by denying
emphatically that Mr. Resck had left the country voluntarily, as the
government reported, and stated that, to the contrary, Mr. Resck had
been expelled by the police to the bordering city of Clorinda,
Argentine, on Saturday, June 27. The petitioner added that deportation
of dissident and opposition political leaders has been an illegal
practice since the 1967 Constitution went into effect. Article 56 of
this Constitution reads: "All inhabitants may move freely
throughout national territory, change their domicile or residence, leave
the republic or return to it, bring their property or remove it from the
country, without any limitations, in the latter case, other than those
established by law." 5. According to
information received by the Commission, Mr. Resck along with other
Paraguayan political leaders in exile, attempted unsuccessfully to
return to the country in September, 1982 and February, 1983. 6. The Government
of Paraguay, in a letter dated February 22, 1983, signed by the Deputy
Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Francisco Barreiro Maffiodo,
referred to the case of Mr. Resck by remitting a clipping from the
newspaper, Hoy, of that same date, February 22, 1983, in which
appears an interview granted to the UPI news agency by the Minister of
the Interior, Dr. Sabino Montanaro. The pertinent parts of this
interview are as follows: Asuncion,
21 (UPI): The Paraguayan Minister of the Interior, Sabino Montanaro,
said that political exiles, except one whom he called "mentally
unbalanced" and another whom he linked to communism, may return to
Paraguay individually, but not in a group. According
to Montanaro, the "mentally unbalanced person" is the founder
of the Christian Democratic Party, Luis Resck, and the person associated
with Marxism is the well-known writer, Augusto Roa Bastos.... When
questioned about the reason that the Christian Democratic Party was not
recognized officially, Montanaro stated that it was a matter for the
courts which the government "may not force to adopt a decision
since the Judicial Branch is independent." Furthermore,
Montanaro questioned whether the Christian Democrats have even one
percent of the electorate and stated that the founder of the party, Luis
Resck, was deported because he is "mentally unbalanced" and
"an inciter to rebellion." He
accused Resck of organizing students to "rise up against the
government" and added that, according to intelligence services,
they were preparing subversive acts and thus, "as a preventive
measure, we expelled Resck....." Montanaro
stated that the other exiles may return to the country, including
dissidents of the official Colorado Party, but they must do so "one
by one, not in a group, to prevent a tumult and to allow us to control
their activities...." 7. The Commission,
noting an obvious contradiction between the statements made by the
government in its note of June 31, 1981, and the statements made by the
Minister of the Interior, Sabino Montanaro, in the interview with the
UPI news agency to which the preceding paragraph refers, addressed the
Paraguayan Government in a letter dated June 16, 1983, in the following
terms: Ref:
Cases Nš 4563, 7848 and 8027 In
its last session the IACHR took up the aforementioned cases and found
that there exists a contradiction between statements made by Your
Distinguished Government in its letters of December 15, 1982, June 31,
1981 and August 24, 1982, pertaining to these cases, and the statements
made by the Minister of the Interior, Mr. Sabino Augusto Montanaro, in
his declarations to the press which appeared in the newspaper Hoy
of February 22, 1983, a clipping of which was sent to the IACHR attached
to a note from the Minister of Foreign Affairs signed by the Deputy
Secretary of that portfolio, Ambassador Francisco Barreiro Maffiodo. In
effect, on one hand, in the notes referred to above, the government
maintains that Messrs. Laino, Resck and Roa Bastos chose to leave the
country after being detained for a period under the authority of Article
79 of the National Constitution, thus giving the impression that they
did so voluntarily, and on the other, the Minister of the Interior
states to the press that Mr. Laino was deported "for having painted
political slogans on walls in the streets, an act he considered the
beginning of a destabilization campaign against the government,"
that Luis Alfonso Resck was deported because "he is a mentally
unbalanced person and an inciter to rebellion" and that the other
expelled person, the writer Roa Bastos, "has ties with Soviet and
Cuban elements and wanted to give a lecture at a high school and a
university" and that "before he could begin to indoctrinate
our youth to organize guerrilla warfare or to rise up against the
government, we expelled him from the country." In
another part of his statement, the Minister ads, "the other exiles
may return to the country, including the dissidents of the Colorado
Party." The
petitioners have denied that the aforementioned persons left the country
voluntarily. Actually, in agreement with the statements made by the
Minister of the Interior, they confirmed that the aforementioned persons
were forced to leave the country and have been denied permission to
return. They gave as an example the case of Mr. Laino who, according to
a letter whose pertinent parts were sent to the Paraguayan Government in
a note dated April 5, 1983, attempted to return to the country on March
25, 1983, in a scheduled Aerolineas Argentinas flight but was forced to
return to the place of embarkation in the same airplane that took him to
Asuncion. In
view of the foregoing, the Commission has instructed me in particular to
write to the Government of Paraguay to request information about the
exact situation of Messrs. Domingo Laino, Luis Alfonso Resck and Augusto
Roa Bastos. Specifically, the IACHR would like to know: If, as the
Minister of the Interior states, Messrs. Laino, Resck and Roa Bastos
were expelled from the country. If this is the case, the Commission
would like to have a copy of the verdict handed down by the Court that
ordered the expulsion of the aforementioned persons. If, to the
contrary, this is not the case, the Commission would like to know on the
basis of what legal provision the Paraguayan Government does not allow
the aforementioned persons to enter the country. 8. To date, the
Government of Paraguay has not replied to the aforementioned letter and
Mr. Luis Alfonso Resck, according to information in the possession of
the Commission, still remains in exile from the country. WHEREAS:
1. The right of
every person to live in his own country, to leave it, and to return when
he considers it advisable, is being recognized by all international
instruments that safeguard human rights, among them, the American
Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, Article 8, of which reads: Every
person has the right to fix his residence within the territory of the
state of which he is a national, to move about freely within such
territory, and not to leave it except by his own will. 2. The
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, in taking up the problem of
expulsion of nationals, has pointed out: It
is cause for alarm and concern the frequency with which the measure of
expulsion of nationals is resorted to not as the exercise of an option,
as some legislations provide, but as an act imposed upon the person by
force and against which the person has no recourse, in violation of the
right of residence and free movement established in Article 8 of the
American Declaration. (Annual Report of the IACHR, 1976, p. 18). These
expulsions, administratively decreed without any type of legal
proceedings, generally have been for an undetermined length of time,
thus increasing even more their cruelty and irrationality, and making
this sanction even more onerous than that attached to the commission of
a crime which always has a sentence for a set period of time. (Annual
Report of the IACHR, 1980-1981, p. 120). 3. The
declarations of the Minister of the Interior, Dr. Sabino Montanaro,
given to the UPI news agency and printed in the edition of the newspaper
Hoy of February 22, 1983, the text of which was sent officially
to the Commission by the Paraguayan Government in a note dated February
22, signed by the Deputy Secretary of Foreign Affairs, leads to the
unmistakable conclusion that Mr. Luis Alfonso Resck did not voluntarily
leave the country but was forced to leave his native country and remain
on foreign soil against his will. 4. From the same
declarations made by Minister Montanaro and the lack of a reply to the
note from the Commission dated June 23, 1983, it follows that the
expulsion of Mr. Luis Alfonso Resck from the country was decreed
administratively without any type of legal proceedings and without
recourse to any appeal, as a means of eliminating a political dissident
whom the government considers a threat to its internal security. 5. The liberty of
persons includes the liberty of remaining in the country of which the
person is a citizen and which constitutes the center of his
professional, family and social life. The expulsion of a citizen by his
government, under normal circumstances, is totally excluded by current
human rights norms. THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. To declare that
the Government of Paraguay has violated Articles VIII (right to
residence and movement), XVIII (right to a fair trial), XXV (right of
protection from arbitrary arrest) and XXVI (right to due process of law)
of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. 2. To recommend to
the Government of Paraguay: (a) That it take the measures necessary so
that Mr. Luis Alfonso Resck may return to his home country, Paraguay,
and enjoy all the rights and guarantees that the Paraguayan constitution
and its laws and international instruments relating to human rights
confer to him; (b) That it provide for a full and impartial
investigation to determine the persons responsible for the alleged acts
and impose on them the corresponding penalty in accordance with
Paraguayan law; (c) That it report to the Commission within the term of
sixty days on the measures taken to put this recommendation into
practice. 3. To communicate
this resolution to the Government of Paraguay. 4. To publish this
resolution in the Annual Report of the Commission to the General
Assembly of the Organization of American States if the Government of
Paraguay does not accept, within the aforementioned term, the
recommendations made. [ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
|