OEA/Ser.L/V/II.110 THIRD REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN PARAGUAY CHAPTER
V ECONOMIC,
SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS
D.
SITUATION OF THE PEASANT POPULATION
31.
Paraguay’s peasant population, which as mentioned earlier includes
about one-half of the country’s population, is extremely hard hit by the
economic crisis that affects Paraguay. In
this respect, it has been said that there is mounting
deterioration of the living conditions of the rural population, which has a
significant impact on their capacity for food self-reliance, especially the
peasant strata with less than three hectares (minifundia, or smallholders), 62%
of whom live in poverty. The abrupt
loss of capacity to cover the food needs of this stratum of semi-wage-earning
farmers, most of whom are employed in agricultural work in the same area, is
likely associated with the loss of jobs due to the crisis in cotton, along with
the limited availability of land and capital to restore their subsistence crops.[26]
32.
Among the fundamental causes of the impoverishment of Paraguay’s
peasant population is the lack of access to land.
In this respect, it is noted that The
peasant sectors were caught up once again, on the threshold of the 21st century,
in a atavistic process of minifundización
as a result of the demographic pressure on the land. This process consists of the successive subdivisions of the
original small plots, to make way for the new families that split off from the
paternal home. ... There
is a close correspondence between minifundio
and extreme poverty in the countryside, revealing that the determining cause of
impoverishment is lack of access to land.
Approximately
1.5% of the rural properties, made up of latifundia
devoted to extensive cattle-raising, control 79% of the productive area; at the
other extreme, however, some 88% of rural properties, in the hands of peasant
families, occupy only 8% of the productive areas. This pattern of land distribution makes Paraguay among the
countries of the world with the highest and most unjust concentration of
property; this situation is aggravated bearing in mind that Paraguay has the
highest percentage of peasant population of any country in Latin America. ... The
poor distribution of land embodies the principal mechanism of social exclusion,
which casts the vast majority of the rural population into a life of privations.
Land reform continues to be a right not attained for more than half of
the country’s rural population.[27]
33.
In addition to the foregoing are the well-founded assertions according to
which, in addition to an appropriate system for gaining access to the land,
there is a need for “the state to give impetus to effective policies aimed at
the productive transformation of the peasant sector, through favorable
macroeconomic measures, as well as policies for socio-productive recovery that
include investment in infrastructure and that strengthen the possibilities of
micro-economic development of the family farm,” with a view to “recovering
the integrity and vitality of peasant society, and endowing it with the capacity
to tackle, autonomously, its full entry to modernity, beginning with breaking
down the clientelistic political relations that subjugate it in dissociation and
immobility.”[28]
34.
The right to work is a human right of special importance that is bound up
with the enjoyment of many other rights. In
this respect, it should be noted that it is the first of the rights referred to
in the Protocol of San Salvador. That
instrument, at Articles 6 and 7, provides that the states undertake “to adopt
measures that will make the right to work fully effective,” and that they
should guarantee, in their legislation, in particular, “[r]emuneration which
guarantees, as a minimum, to all workers dignified and decent living conditions
for them and their families.”
35.
During its on-site visit to Paraguay, and afterwards, the Commission
received a series of complaints on aspects concerning the right to work.
In general, the IACHR was told that The
human rights situation of Paraguayan workers has not improved; to the contrary,
the prolonged recession the economy is suffering, aggravated by the political
crises, has worsened the working and living conditions of Paraguayan workers. The
violations of workers’ rights in the last year are, in general, the same as
those experienced repeatedly over the last decade, thus one can speak of a
worrisome level of impunity due to the lack of punishment and the inability of
society to generate corrective measures.[29]
36.
Another problematic issue on which the Commission has received
information refers to the failure of businesses and other sectors of the economy
to pay the minimum wage. In this respect, it is noted that The
employer sector uses the pressure of the informal workers in the labor market to
adopt, de facto, more flexible levels
of remuneration. Union sources
received fewer complaints of pay below the legal minimum wage in comparison to
previous years, yet there were more cases in which the worker has a 10-hour work
day yet is paid for only eight hours.
There
are also reports of violations of the maximum number of hours in the work day,
the most pathetic example being in the transportation sector.
Drivers work up to 16 hours daily ... without receiving the labor
benefits established by law.[30] 37. The Commission also received complaints that indicate that many industrial, commercial, and services establishments do not cover medical and social security services, and that they do not file with the Social Security Institute (Instituto de Previsión Social), or do not pay their contributions to that Institute, so that when the time comes, workers do not have access to these services. In addition, the IACHR was told that many companies do not meet the minimum provisions relating to industrial safety and hygiene in the workplace, with the consequent detriment to the health and life of the workers in some cases.
38.
In relation to union rights, it should be noted that Article 8 of the
Protocol of San Salvador provides as follows: Trade
Union Rights 1.
The States Parties shall ensure:
a.
The right of workers to organize trade unions and to join the union of
their choice for the purpose of protecting and promoting their interests. As an
extension of that right, the States Parties shall permit trade unions to
establish national federations or confederations, or to affiliate with those
that already exist, as well as to form international trade union organizations
and to affiliate with that of their choice. The States Parties shall also permit
trade unions, federations and confederations to function freely; b.
The right to strike. 2.
The exercise of the rights set forth above may be subject only to
restrictions established by law, provided that such restrictions are
characteristic of a democratic society and necessary for safeguarding public
order or for protecting public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of
others. Members of the armed forces and the police and of other essential public
services shall be subject to limitations and restrictions established by law.
39.
In its on-site visit to Paraguay, the Commission met with the Central
General de Trabajadores (CGT) of Paraguay, which, at the end of the meeting,
delivered a letter to the IACHR indicating, among other things, as follows: At
the same time, we take this opportunity ... to denounce, to you, the persecution
for union activity of which the leaders of public and private institutions in
our country are victim, because we believe that the right to organize to improve
living and working conditions and to struggle for at least minimal compliance
with the labor laws are also fundamental rights of human beings. They
are persecuted for coming out in defense of their jobs, and others are
persecuted and dismissed for struggling for better working conditions, in
violation of the laws and the National Constitution, and worst of all, judicial
orders to reinstate the workers are defied. For example, in the office of the
Governor of Alto Paraná, the Governor, Mr. Jovino Urunaga, fired all the union
leaders, dismantling the union organization, while the workers were not been
paid their salaries for seven months. This
is just one of the cases that our union federation is handling.[31]
40.
In the same vein, it has been noted that according to the records of the Central
Unitaria de Trabajadores (CUT), from July to October 1999, 213 workers were
fired for organizing a union, and there is persecution of trade union leaders to
discourage or directly violate or lead to failure to renew collective bargaining
agreements. In addition, the
Ministry of Justice and Labor did not and does not have the capacity to enforce
the collective bargaining agreements; rather, the unions perceive the labor
authorities as abettors of the violations of labor rights committed by
entrepreneurs, and they regard the mechanisms for state intervention as
bureaucratic and dilatory. Nonetheless,
for the CUT this Ministry improved its image and operations in the last months
of 1999, with the appointment of the former counsel to that federation as
vice-minister of labor, which has speeded up the union procedures and given
greater credibility to the Ministry’s inspections.[32]
41.
In relation to the foregoing, one must take into account that the
Commission is competent to hear individual complaints against a state party to
the Protocol of San Salvador in relation to certain aspects of union rights.
In effect, under Article 8(1)(a) of that instrument, the states parties,
among them Paraguay, undertake to guarantee the right of workers to organize
unions and to join the union of their choosing to protect and promote their
interests. At the same time,
Article 19(6) of the Protocol of San Salvador provides that if the
aforementioned right, among others, is violated by “action directly
attributable to a State Party to this Protocol may give rise, through
participation” of the IACHR and the Inter-American Court in enforcing the
system of individual petitions established in the American Convention.
42.
In relation to the right to social security, Article 9 of the Protocol of
San Salvador establishes as follows: Right
to Social Security 1.
Everyone shall have the right to social security protecting him from the
consequences of old age and of disability which prevents him, physically or
mentally, from securing the means for a dignified and decent existence. In the
event of the death of a beneficiary, social security benefits shall be applied
to his dependents. 2.
In the case of persons who are employed, the right to social security shall
cover at least medical care and an allowance or retirement benefit in the case
of work accidents or occupational disease and, in the case of women, paid
maternity leave before and after childbirth.
43.
The situation concerning the right to social security in Paraguay is
plagued by serious shortcomings. It
has been noted in this respect, based on a study of the situation by the
International Labor Organization (ILO), as follows: The
situation of the right to social security in Paraguay is dramatic, as an
extremely small percentage of the population has access to it. ... Among
the main problems encountered are the low coverage, the high levels of evasion,
and the scant transparency.... The
lack of protection for disability, care for the elderly, and upon death, are
particularly dramatic in the rural sector, as the most protected citizens are
concentrated in the metropolitan area of Asunción.
The
levels of evasion are extremely high, at more than 60%, according to the
authorities of the Social Security Institute (IPS), the main social security
agency. ... As
regards the handling of the agencies, there is still an absolute lack of
transparency, both in the administration of the funds and in the information
presented on the reality of the system.[33]
44.
The Protocol of San Salvador establishes, at Article 10, the following
provisions concerning the right to health:
Right to Health 1.
Everyone shall have the right to health, understood to mean the enjoyment of the
highest level of physical, mental and social well‑being. 2.
In order to ensure the exercise of the right to health, the States Parties agree
to recognize health as a public good and, particularly, to adopt the following
measures to ensure that right: a.
Primary health care, that is, essential health care made available to all
individuals and families in the community; b.
Extension of the benefits of health services to all individuals subject
to the State's jurisdiction; c.
Universal immunization against the principal infectious diseases; d.
Prevention and treatment of endemic, occupational and other diseases; e.
Education of the population on the prevention and treatment of health
problems, and f.
Satisfaction of the health needs of the highest risk groups and of those
whose poverty makes them the most vulnerable.
45.
In a study by Dr. Esperanza Martínez, of the Círculo Paraguayo de Médicos,
she argues that as regards the right to health in Paraguay,
...
The
worsening of this situation is mainly due to the increase in poverty and the
Government’s lack of social sensitivity when it comes to supporting the health
sector with funds. In addition, corruption and political prebends constitute the
greatest social cancer, making it impossible for the plans, projects, and
resources allocated in the respective budgets to be used adequately and
efficiently.[34]
46.
Among the specific problematic points mentioned in the study cited are
the detection of epidemic outbreaks of several diseases in the course of 1999;
issues relating to maternal and child health, where it is noted that Paraguay
has the third-highest rate of maternal mortality in Latin America, and that
though there is a “Project for Maternal Health and Integral Development of the
Child” financed by loans from the World Bank and the Inter-American
Development Bank, that project “continues to have a very low level of
attainment of goals and activities, approximately two years since it was begun,
with the high financial cost it represents for the country.”
It is also noted that 1999 “was characterized by having the greatest
deficit in the transfer of resources to the health sector which, together with
the poor use of the scarce resources provided, causes the hospitals, health
centers, and health posts to have practically no supplies, putting them in a
situation of ‘technical work stoppage,’ as they cannot offer services to the
population.”[35]
47.
In view of the foregoing considerations, the Commission urges the
Paraguayan State to accord higher priority and to muster greater political will
to address issues related to social and economic rights.
The Paraguayan State should redouble its efforts to adopt policies that
seek economic growth for the country that benefits the vulnerable social
classes. In this respect, the Human
Development Report should be borne in mind where it states: “Policies are needed to link growth and rights. The
allocation of resources and the pattern of economic growth must be pro-poor,
pro-human development and pro-human rights.”[36]
48.
The specific strategies mentioned that should be taken into account in
fighting poverty include: “1. Pursuing
pro-poor economic growth. Low-income countries need to accelerate their
growth, but the pattern should be pro-poor, to benefit those in both income and
human poverty. 2. Restructuring budgets. To provide adequate and non-discriminatory
expenditures for primary human concerns, especially basic social services,
requires a review of priorities and removal of discrimination against the most
deprived. 3.
Ensuring participation. Poor
people have a right to be consulted on decisions that affect their lives. This
requires processes that expand political space -- to give voice to poor people
and their advocates, including NGOs, free media and workers associations.
4. Protecting
environmental resources and the social capital of poor communities. The
natural environment and social networks are resources poor people draw on for
their livelihoods to escape poverty. 5. Removing discrimination
-- against women, ethnic minorities, racial groups and others.
Social reforms are needed to remove all forms of discrimination.”[37]
49.
It is also important to bear in mind that, as indicated in a recent World
Bank study, “‘social safety net’ measures such as unemployment insurance,
subsidized school fees, job creation programs, and food subsidies are essential
for eventual broad‑based recovery.”[38]
50.
Moreover, the following considerations should also be taken into account,
among other actions that have been recommended along these lines: If
economic growth today creates jobs which require higher skills, one basic
ingredient for the reduction of poverty is to raise the skills of
low‑income groups. This entails not only increasing the quantity, but more
importantly, the quality, of education in the region, and also, promoting
increased demand for educational services by programs which encourage
school‑readiness and school attendance, and which encourage the use of
health and nutrition services. ... Poverty
is fundamentally linked to lack of access--by control or
ownership--to productive and financial assets. Policies that can
promote the poor’s access to assets include initiatives such as land reform,
inheritance taxes, privatizations which distribute shares among the population,
and housing and credit programs, to name some of the most important. Actions
which increase the poor’s access to market opportunities also comprise an
important element of the poverty reduction arsenal. It is essential to correct
failures in the credit market, eliminate discriminatory practices in the labor
market and the judicial system, reduce restrictions to labor mobility, and
guarantee title of property for the poor.[39]
51.
As regards more specific points, the Inter-American Commission recommends
to the Paraguayan State that it accord due importance and respect to everything
in the way of the right to work, trade union rights, and the right to social
security, including measures aimed at guaranteeing observance of the minimum
wage laws, which should be sufficient to cover the cost of the basic family
market basket. In addition, priority should be accorded to solving the
structural problems related to the situation of the peasant population, and to
the right to health for all persons under the jurisdiction of the Paraguayan
State.
[ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
[26]
Barrios, Federico, Centro Paraguayo de Estudios Sociológicos (CPES),
Pobreza Rural en Paraguay, study
published in Derechos Humanos en Paraguay 1999, op. cit., pp. 284-285. [27]
Id., pp. 285-287. [28]
Id., pp. 290-291. [29]
Monte Domecq, Raúl, Gestión Local, Derecho al Empleo, study
published in Derechos Humanos en Paraguay 1999, op.
cit., p. 295. [30]
Id., p. 296. [31]
Central General de Trabajadores (CGT), letter to the IACHR dated July
30, 1999. [32]
Monte Domecq, Raúl, op. cit., pp.
295-296. [33]
Paredes, Roberto, Derecho a la
Seguridad Social, study published in Derechos Humanos en Paraguay
1999, op. cit., pp. 345-346. [34]
Martínez, Esperanza, Círculo Paraguayo de Médicos, Derecho
a la Salud, study published in Derechos Humanos en Paraguay 1999,
op. cit., pp. 303-304. [35]
Id., pp. 304-305. [36]
Human Development Report 2000, op.cit.,
p. 82. [37]
Id., p. 78. [38]
World Bank, Press Release No. 99/2214/S of June 2, 1999. [39]
Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department, The
Inter-American Development Bank and Poverty Reduction: An Overview
(Revised Version). By Nora Lustig and Ruthanne Deutsch.
(3/98,
POV-101r, E, S) |