OEA/Ser.L/V/II.46 REPORT ON THE
SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS CHAPTER
VIII RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF THOUGHT AND OF EXPRESSION American Declaration Article
III: Every
person has the right freely to profess a religious faith, and to manifest and
practice it both in public and in private.
[1]/ Article
IV: Every
person has the right to freedom of investigation, of opinion, and of the
expression and dissemination of ideas, by any medium whatsoever.
[2]/
A.
Constitutional Provisions 1. Article 158 of the Constitution, first paragraph, and provides that: “Every person may freely express and disseminate his thoughts provided they are not injurious to morals or to the private lives of persons. The exercise of this right shall not be subject to previous examination, censorship, or bond; but anyone who violates the law thereby shall be liable for the offense committed.”
2.
In Article 157, “The free exercise of all religions, without other
restrictions than that required by morals or the public order, is guaranteed.”
3.
In Article 158, fourth paragraph, of the Constitution, it is established
as an express prohibition that: “In
no event may the press, its accessories, or any other material means devoted to
the dissemination of thought be confiscated as an instrument of crime.”
4.
The second paragraph of Article 157 of the Constitution provides that:
“Neither the clergy nor laymen may engage in political propaganda of any kind
based on religious motives or making use of the religious beliefs of the people.
Likewise, the laws of the state, its government, or public officials may
not be criticized in religious rights or sermons in places of worship”
5.
In Article 158, second paragraph, it is established that “Propaganda
advocating anarchistic or anti-democratic doctrines is prohibited”.
Also, in the last paragraph of Article 160, “The functioning of
international or foreign political organizations is likewise prohibited,
excepting those which by democratic means advocate Central American union or
hemispheric or universal cooperation on a basis of fraternity.”
6.
There follows part of the articles of the Law of Defense and Guaranty of
Public Order (Decree No. 407), the interpretation and application of which might
hinder the observance of freedom of expression and of information, as will be
explained farther on. LAW
ON DEFENSE AND GUARANTY OF PUBLIC ORDER TITLE
I OFFENSES
AND PENALTIES “Article 1. Totalitarian doctrines are contrary to the democratic system established by the Constitution and those who commit the following acts in order to instill and support such doctrines commit an offense against the constitutional public order: ….
“2. Those who by the
spoken or written word, or by any other means, induce one or more members of the
Armed Forces to violate discipline or to disobey their superiors or the
constituted Powers of the Government of the Republic;
….
“7. Those who propagate,
encourage, or use their personal status or circumstances, either by the spoken
or written word or by any means, doctrines aimed at destroying the social order,
or the political and juridical organization that the Constitution establishes.
….
“15. Those who propagate
by the spoken or written word, or by any other means within the country, or send
abroad, tendentious or false news or information designed to disrupt the
constitutional or legal order, the tranquility or security of the country, the
economic or monetary system, or the stability of public values and property;
those who publish such news and information in the mass communication media; and
those citizens of El Salvador who, while abroad, disseminate news and
information of that kind;
To determine whether these crimes have been committed in order to implant
or support totalitarian doctrines, the following factors shall be taken into
account: c. The fact of having claimed to have participated in the crime, through any
means of communications; d. The unequivocal and express public demonstrations of the connection of
the events to the objectives of such doctrines. Consisting of manifestoes,
phrases, words, letters, signs, or acronyms of the names of clandestine groups,
and figures or emblems of all other kinds that may appear before, at the same
time as, or subsequent to perpetration of the crime.” 7.
In the following articles of Decree 407 (2 through 6) the penalties or
sanctions are established—as well as the way to determine them—applicable to
the offenses contemplated in the various subparagraphs of its Article 1, and it
is provided at the end of Article 6 that: “Anyone
found guilty of committing an offense referred to in this law may not be
released from jail prior to completion of his sentence”; and in Article 7 it
is added that: “When any of the offenses provided for in this law appears in
another law carrying a heavier sentence, the courts shall be obligated to apply
the heavier sentence.” B.
Expressions of this Freedom in Practice
8.
At present, the greatest restriction on the freedom of the press and
information is the fact that the law on Defense and Guaranty of Public Order is
in force, when it defines as an offense, in such vague terms, the action of
those who “propagate by the spoken or written word, or by any other means
within the country, or send abroad, tendentious, .. News or information designed
to disrupt the constitutional or legal order..; those who publish such news and
information in mass communication media; and those citizens of El Salvador who,
while abroad, disseminate news and information of that kind.”
It is necessary to point out that the practical result of these standards
is the imposition, in practice, of self-censorship.
9.
Thus, for example, those who make such criticisms assert that the
aforementioned is true, especially with respect to freedom of the press through
the various media of dissemination; of the practice of their ministry by the
priests and laymen connected in particular with the social action works
conducted in the country by the Catholic Church; of the activities of
propaganda, proselytizing, organization, orientation, and direction by trade
unions leaders—especially in the campesino sector; as well as the
actions of the executive boards of political parties, professional associations,
student sectors, and particularly the various pressure groups considered as in
the “opposition.”
10.
The Salvadoran trade union leaders, during interviews with members of the
Special Committee, complained that the national mass media, once the Law of
Defense and Guaranty of Public Order came into force, refused to accept their
press releases—even as paid announcements—and when they were accepted, it
was done only on conditions of prior censorship, also said that this forced them
to disseminate their communiqués and reports through pamphlets and fliers,
causing great difficulties and problems, as many of their members who has
circulated them have been arrested and subsequently accused of distributing
literature.
11.
The Special Committee received complaints about censorship or threats to
the press such as threats by government’s authorities—although not carried
out—of closing the periodical of the Salvadorian Catholic diocese, “Orientación,”
and it s radio station, “YSAX,” unless they submitted to strict censorship,
and the closing during the State of Siege, on March 3, 1977, of the newspaper
“La Crónica,” an influential paper of small circulation respected by
Salvadorian public opinion. When
the State of Siege was lifted (July 1977), the closing of “La Crónica” was
lifted, and it has been published since then,
This newspaper has protested editorially against the restrictions imposed
on the freedom of the press through the effect of Section 15 of Article 1 of
Decree No. 407.
12.
Both in the Introduction to this report and in the preceding chapter,
reference were made to the conflict that arose between the Government and the
Catholic Church. In this chapter of
freedom of expression and information, it is appropriate to point out, in
addition to what has been said about the periodical “Orientation” and the
radio station “YSAX” both of
Catholic Church, that a denunciation was also made to the Special Committee of a
dynamite attack that destroyed the Church press, as well as of five dynamite
attacks that damaged the Universidad “José Simeón Cañaz” of the Jesuit
Fathers.
13.
Also denounced to the Special Committee were a number of attacks on
various priest and laymen for the purpose of restraining them in the free
dissemination of the social doctrine of the Church,
particularly with respect to works of socio-economic promotion of
campesinos. According to
denunciations, the threats escalated to more serious violations of human rights,
such as the murder of the priest Rutilio Grande García and Alfonso Navarro
Oviedo [3]/;
the imprisonment and torture of the priests Rafael Barahona, Antonio
Vidas, Guillermo Denoux, Víctor Guevara, Gonzalo López, and Jorge Sarsanedas,
and the expulsion form the national territory of the priests José Luis Ortega,
Jorge Sarsanedas, Salvador Carranza, Marcelino Pérez, Juan Murphy, Bernardo
Survil, Mario Bernal, and Guillermo Denoux.
According to the denunciations and other information in the hands of the
special Committee, the ones most often attacked have been the Catholic priests,
and within that group, the community of the Jesuit Fathers, because of their
participation in the organization and orientation of social apostle-ship and
action.
14.
The Special Committee was informed that at present, in El Salvador, by
virtue of the constitutional limitations already mentioned in this Chapter, and
particularly since Decree 407 came into force, the priest have been obliged to
limit themselves in the expression of their thoughts and the dissemination for
their ideas in sermons or public statements.
15.
In the introduction to this report reference was made to the interviews
that the Special Committee held with representatives of other churches.
In this chapter it is appropriate to note that in the interviews those
representatives did not allege violations of their freedoms of expression and of
information, adding that they were able to practice their religion.
Likewise, those representatives added that their mission was evangelical.
Moreover, in the visit that the Special Committee paid to the Rabbi of
San Salvador, he stated that the small Hebrew community in El Salvador never had
difficulties of any kind with the Salvadorian authorities, adding that
personally he has not known of persecutions against other creeds.
[ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
[1]
/36
American Convention on Human Rights
Article 12. Freedom of
conscience and religion
1.
Everyone has the right to freedom of conscience and of religion.
This right includes freedom to maintain or to change one’s religion
or beliefs, and freedom to profess or disseminate one’s religious or
beliefs.
2.
No one shall be subject to restrictions that might impair his freedom
to maintain or to change his religion or beliefs.
3.
Freedom to manifest one’s religion and beliefs may be subject only
to the limitations prescribed by law that are necessary to protect public
safety, order, health, or morals, or the rights or freedoms of others.
Article 13. Freedom of
Thought and Expression
1.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought and expression.
This right includes freedom to seek, receive, and impart information
and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing,
in print, in the form of art, or through any other medium of one’s choice.
2.
The exercise of the right provided for in the foregoing paragraph
shall not be subject to prior censorship but shall be subject to subsequent
imposition of liability, which shall be expressly established by law to the
extent necessary to ensure: a.
Respect for the rights or reputations of others; or b.
The protection of national security, public order, or public health
or morals. 3.
The right of expression may not be restricted by indirect methods or
means; such as the abuse of government or private controls over newsprint,
radio-broadcasting frequencies, or equipment used in the dissemination of
information. Or by any other
means tending to impede the communication and circulation of ideas and
opinions. 4.
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2 above, public
entertainment may be subject by law to prior censorship for the sole purpose
of regulating access to them for the moral protection of childhood and
adolescence. 5.
Any propaganda for war and any advocacy of national, racial, or
religious hatred. That
constitutes incitements to lawless violence or to any other similar illegal
action against any person or group of persons on any grounds including those
of race, color, religion, language, or national origin shall be considered
as offenses punishable by law. [3]
See Chapter II, p. 50 |