VIOLENCE AND DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN IN THE ARMED
CONFLICT IN COLOMBIA


 

V.        THE RESPONSE OF THE COLOMBIAN STATE TO THE IMPACT OF THE ARMED CONFLICT ON WOMEN

 

149.     The Colombian State is obligated to exercise due diligence to prevent, sanction and eradicate the violence and discrimination against women aggravated by the armed conflict, even though the conflict poses complex challenges to this response.  In the past, the IACHR has recommended to the Colombian State to guarantee the validity and enforcement of legislative, public policy and institutional measures to protect the rights of women to live free from violence and discrimination, as well as to ensure the assignment of necessary resources for its implementation.[180]  The IACHR has also emphasized the obligation of the State to investigate and sanction those responsible for these acts, as well as its duty to offer reparations to the victims.[181]  As mentioned previously, the obligation of the State to act with due diligence has four components: the prevention, investigation, punishment and reparation of human rights violations.

 

150.     The IACHR has learned of key developments in the response of the Colombian State to generally protect the rights of women.  These have been above all in the adoption of a legal and public policy framework, as well as the design of State programs.  Furthermore, during the visit it was evident that State officials acknowledge and generally understand the scope of the existing challenges and express their willingness to find solutions both at the national and local level.

 

151.     The IACHR also recognizes the efforts on public policies to address the specific needs of women in the armed conflict, such as the policy denominated, Mujeres Constructoras de Paz y Seguridad, as well as a series of institutions and mechanisms at the national and local level to enforce these laws.  It is also important to highlight the efforts of the Colombian State to gather statistics about the violations of the rights of women, including the Observatory of Gender Issues, the work of the National Institute of Legal Medicine, and the incorporation of gender into the statistics of the Administrative Department of National Statistics (hereinafter “DANE”) and the Social Solidarity Network.  Moreover, the Constitutional Court has issued a series of notable court decisions over the last ten years, successfully invoking the recourses of tutela and inconstitucionalidad to protect the civil, political, social, cultural and economic rights of Colombian women.

 

152.     Nonetheless, both State authorities and civil society representatives, expressed their concern at the lack of an integral State policy addressing the specific impact of the armed conflict on the human rights of women, applicable to both the national and local levels.  This deficiency promotes a context of impunity that perpetuates the treatment of women as “spoils of war” by the armed actors.  The Rapporteur also corroborated noticeable flaws in the diagnosis, prevention and early warning of different forms of discrimination and violence against women which are aggravated by the armed conflict, and gaps in the provision of humanitarian assistance and multidisciplinary support services for victims, especially to displaced women. 

 

153.     On the other hand, it is important to highlight the homogeneous view of women of the Colombian State as a target group of public policies and as victims of the armed conflict.  Article 9 of the Convention of Belém do Pará obligates States to take special account in their legislation and public policies of the vulnerability of certain groups of women to violent acts on the basis of their race, ethnicity, refugee or displaced status, pregnancy and minor age, among other risk factors. [182]  However, during the visit and interviews of the delegation with State authorities, civil society and international agency organizations it was evident that these vulnerability factors still need to be taken into account by the Colombian State in the development of public policies and attention programs destined to improve the situation of all women.

 

154.     The IACHR observed specifically the absence at the national and local levels of the specific and different needs of indigenous and Afro-Colombian women in the programs and public policies geared towards protecting the rights of women.  It is key that the State implements measures to eradicate discriminatory socio-cultural patterns on the basis of sex, race, ethnic background and social class and to take these differences into account, as well as the possibility of discrimination on the basis of more than one factor, in the development of public policies to mitigate the pernicious effect of the armed conflict on Colombian women.

 

155.     On the other hand, the Rapporteur corroborated that the work of women’s rights defenders and their organizations still does not have the support and legitimacy of the State.  The need persists to protect their existence and safety throughout the national territory.

 

156.     In this context, and even in the presence of certain progress, women still confront numerous legislative, institutional, cultural and geographic obstacles to effectively access justice.  Among the most notable challenges are deficiencies in the investigation, judgment and sanction of acts of violence and discrimination, gaps in the collection of statistics, the mistrust of the administration of justice in the victims, the need for sustainable capacity-building programs for justice officials and programs to sensitize the population and promote the filing of complaints.   Additionally, there is a lack of justice in the zones occupied by the actors of the armed conflict and alarming principles within the penal procedure code applicable to violence against women that can challenge the access of women to effective judicial protections and guarantees. 

 

A.      Advances in the development of a legislative and public policy framework, and State programs to protect the rights of women

 

157.     The Rapporteur recognizes advances in the development of a legislative and public policy framework to address the discrimination and violence against women produced by the armed conflict supported by the Colombian State.  Colombia is a party to the American Convention[183] and between 1995 and 2004 the State has adopted a series of laws, decrees and policies to advance the rights of women.  Among the most noteworthy developments are Laws 51 and 248 of 1985 and 1995, by which the CEDAW and Belém do Pará Conventions were adopted as part of the domestic legislation, and Articles 13 and 43 of the Colombian Constitution, which guarantee equality under the law and non-discrimination against women.  There is also a legal framework in place to prevent and eradicate domestic violence pursuant to Law 294 of 1996 and its reform through Law 575 of 2000.  

 

158.     In regard to sexual violence, the Penal Procedural Code also typifies various behaviors as crimes that are part of the subject matter jurisdiction of the Rome Statute.[184]   Under Law 360 of 1997, some norms of the Penal Code of1980 were amended in the sphere of sexual crimes to strengthen the rights of victims. Among the rights included where to be treated with dignity, privacy and respect during any interview or action for medical, legal or social assistance purposes, to be informed about applicable legal procedures and services available, to access services such as testing for sexually transmitted diseases free of charge (including HIV/AIDS) and physical and emotional trauma, to collect legal and medical evidence and to access indemnity for damages resulting from the crime.  This law also provided for the creation throughout the country of specialized units within the Office of the Attorney General to specialize in handling crimes against sexual freedom and human dignity.  Each unit should have an on-site psychologist to advice officials in the management of the cases, and to interview and advice the victims. 

 

159.     It is also important to acknowledge key advances in the problem of trafficking, such as Law 7474 of 2002, which classifies trafficking persons as a crime and Law 800 of 2003, which ratifies the Optional Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially women and children. It is also pertinent to especially recognize that through the Law 984 of June 8 of 2005, Congress approved the law through which the Optional Protocol of CEDAW was ratified.[185]

 

160.     The Constitutional Court has also issued a series of rulings favoring women, by applying the actions of tutela and inconstitucionalidad.  It is recognized by State and non-State authorities that the work of the Constitutional Court has been critical to protect, guarantee and develop the rights of women ingrained in the National Constitution and in international instruments ratified by the Colombian State.[186]  The Court has issued a series of decisions declaring unconstitutional all those norms involving sex-based discriminatory treatment against women in civil, family, labor and public policy matters.[187]  The most recent decisions include Sentence 453 of 2005, in which the Court protected the rights of a woman who had been a victim of sexual violence, establishing that victims of sexual violence have the constitutional right to be protected against proof that entails an unreasonable, unnecessary, and disproportionate intrusion into their private lives.

 

161.     During the visit, the Rapporteur learned of public policy efforts to address the specific needs of women within the framework of the armed conflict.  The Colombian State has established goals oriented to advance the social equity and the human development in the Política de Seguridad Democrática y la Política de Reactivación Social of the administration of President Uribe.[188]  The State has also manifested publicly that within the National Development Plan of 2003-2006, Haciendo un Estado Comunitario, it is launching actions to promote the equity and the empowerment of women with an emphasis in the following areas: women and the economy, violence against women, women in the exercise of power and decision-making.[189]  

 

162.     As an example of positive actions, the Rapporteur learned of the adoption of the national policy known as Mujeres Constructoras de Paz y Seguridad, with the main purpose of gradually achieving equality between men and women in the political participation processes in social, economic, political and cultural life of the country.  The policy includes several program areas, such as, employment and the entrepreneurial development of women, education and culture, sexual and reproductive health, violence against women and institution-strengthening.

 

163.     The Colombian State has also created a series of institutions and mechanisms, nationally and locally, to enforce the legal framework described above.  These include the Presidential Office on Gender Equality, which is the coordinating entity, the Office of the Ombudsman for the Rights of Children, Women and the Family, the Office of the Procurator for the Minor and the Family, the ICBF, the Ministry of the Interior and Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Family Commissions, the Office of the Attorney General, the Ministry of Social Protection, the Social Solidarity Network and the Vice- Presidency of the Republic.

164.     As a result of the existing public policy framework, the Presidential Office on Gender Equality, as coordinating entity, has launched a series of programs aimed at addressing the specific needs of women.  The Presidential Office is executing a plan of affirmative actions, in coordination with ministries and other public entities and in the framework of the Programa Nacional de Desarrollo, in order to incorporate the gender dimension in their programs, projects and budgets.[190] Among them are programs aimed at preventing and confronting domestic violence with an integral model of attention, named  Democracia Familiar and the Mesa Interinstitucional de Violencia Intrafamiliar, the campaign Rutas por la No Violencia to increase the visibility of the violence problem as a human rights violation and to increase the legal training of women[191], and the Consejos Comunitarios de Mujeres, which seek to create collaboration spaces between women and the State at the local level about themes such as political participation and violence.[192]  Furthermore, the inter-institutional program Haz Paz has been created, as a product of the Política Nacional de Construcción de Paz y Convivencia Familiar to promote the prevention, detention, monitoring and attention of domestic violence at the municipal level.[193]  Additionally, a series of State agencies have created programs to assist women victims of violence. [194]

 

165.     It is also important to recognize a series of inter-institutional efforts and programs to combat different forms of violence against women aggravated by the armed conflict.  For example, in the case of sexual crimes, an Equipo Técnico Central has been formed by the ICBF, the Office of the Ombudsman, the Office of the Attorney General, the National Police, the Ministry of Social Protection, UNFPA and the INML.[195]  These agencies have signed an agreement to identify minimum non-negotiable criteria for care provided to victims of sexual crimes, which any official or private party treating the victims must implement.  The model has been validated in five pilot municipalities and there is an expansion process coordinated by the ICBF that has progressed to 19 localities in Bogotá and there are activities under way to achieve its implementation in more than 30 municipalities.[196]  In regards to the issue of trafficking, a Mesa Interinstitucional contra la Trata de Personas has been formed which is coordinated by the Ministry of the Interior and Justice and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

 

166.     The State has also created a series of support services for victims.[197]  Among the most notable ones are the creation of Family Commissions, the Center of Integral Support for Victims of Sexual Crimes, Inter-Institutional Committees that have been created under the Office of the Ombudsman to provide services for victims and survivors of sexual crimes and the territorial extension of centers of the ICBF and the Social Solidarity Network. 

 

167.     In the sphere of health, the Colombian State has publicly stated that the creation and diffusion of the Política Nacional de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva is included within the public health priority goals for the period 2002-2006.[198]  The priorities of this policy include the promotion of safe motherhood, family planning for men and women, the reduction of adolescent fertility, the prevention and control of sexually transmitted diseases, HIV/AIDS, the detection of cervical cancer and the prevention and integral care for domestic and sexual violence.

 

B.      Absence of an integral State policy and of coordinated and multi-disciplinary programs to address the specific impact of the armed conflict on women

 

168.     Despite notable and significant advances, several State and non-State sources communicated their concern to the Rapporteur about the lack of an integral State policy to address the specific impact of the armed conflict on women with a coordinated and multidisciplinary approach that includes the specific needs of women throughout the national territory.  The IACHR observes that the State seems to lack an integral vision and an effective preparation to address the consequences of violence and discrimination that the conflict imposes on women.  The existing policy framework does not provide an adequate base for the implementation of integral programs and services for victims that include the justice, education and health sectors.  The State has recognized publicly that between the years 1995 and 2004, an adequate policy framework, strategies and plans of action were absent to facilitate the systemic follow-up to commitments made to advance the rights of women and the scarcity of resources to implement these measures. [199] 

 

169.     Furthermore, the institutional mechanisms that presently execute programs destined to protect the rights of women lack sufficient influence, competency to coordinate, and the resources to effectively implement State policies destined to mitigate the impact of the armed conflict on women. Several State and non-State sources communicated their concern over the lack of resources and political will to execute the legislation, public policies, institutions and existing programs destined to address the rights of women and how the problems faced by women are secondary to national security needs.  These loopholes and flaws weaken the effectiveness of any legislative and public policy and State programs created to protect the rights of women within the armed conflict. 

 

170.     The Rapporteur learned during the visit of the perception of the international community and of non-governmental organizations of the weak capacity of the Presidential Office on Gender Equality to act as coordinating entity of the inter-institutional efforts to address the specific needs of victims of discrimination and violence and of resources to sustain and create programs.  Moreover, this entity does not seem to have as a priority addressing the impact of the armed conflict on women in regards to violence and discrimination. 

 

171.     During the meeting of the Rapporteur with the Presidential Office on Gender Equality, its actual director, Dr. Martha Lucia Vásquez, highlighted the implementation of programs oriented to advance the economic development of women and the eradication of poverty and not the violence and discrimination that is aggravated by the armed conflict.  Additionally, its programs destined to address violence against women, such as Democracia Familiar and the creation of the Consejos Comunitarios de las Mujeres, do not focus on the impact of the armed conflict on women and the physical, psychological and sexual violence employed, but mostly address the problem of domestic violence.  The Rapporteur recognizes that the budget and political will dedicated to the issue of the impact of the armed conflict on women cannot be evaluated solely by the actions and budget of the Presidential Office on Gender Equality.  However, it considers the programs that are being currently implemented as a reflection of the priorities within the State, due to its competency as coordinating entity of public policies to advance the rights of women.

 

172.        The Rapporteur verified as well during the visit flaws in the coordination and communication between different State entities that execute programs and support services destined to victims of violence and discrimination produced by the conflict.  The Colombian State has recognized that a deficiency in the public attention of violence against women is the: “lack of articulation among the different entities involved that challenges the attention and prevention of violence against women.  It is necessary to improve the channels and mechanisms of coordination, in order for each of the relevant entities to develop, in the framework of its competencies, plans, actions, and programs for the protection, prevention, attention and sanction of violence.”[200] 

 

173.        As previously mentioned, the Rapporteur learned of a series of support services for victims of violence that are granted through the Family Commissions, the Center for Integral Attention for Victims of Sexual Violence of the Office of the Attorney General, the centers of the ICBF, as well as the Inter-Institutional Committees created by the Office of the Ombudsman.  However, the Rapporteur received information through different channels that highlighted the absence of communication and coordination among these services, which results in a fragmentation of the attention to the victims.

 

174.        Additionally, the deficiencies in the coordination between national and local services were evident during the visit of the Rapporteur to Valledupar and Quibdó.  In Valledupar, several units of the Community Ombudsman shared their concern with the delegation over the weak communication between the local units of the Office of the Attorney General and the national unit, mostly when the crimes are committed by the armed actors in occupied zones.  In the particular case of Quibdó, the State authorities shared with the Rapporteur their concern over the low coordination between the national and local services and how they felt “abandoned” and unsupported by the national authorities. 

 

175.        However, the Rapporteur was informed of good practices and local efforts to offer a coordinated and multidisciplinary attention to victims of violence and discrimination, above all to displaced women.  For example, in Valledupar, the Social Solidarity Network and the ICBF are trying to offer a multidisciplinary team support to victims of displacements, including psychologists, nutritionists, and social workers.  Nonetheless, these coordination efforts are limited by the lack of human and financial resources.

 

176.     In regards to resources, several State sources, including the INML and the State authorities interviewed in Valledupar and Quibdó, manifested their concern over the scarcity of resources destined to attend the discrimination and violence against women in Colombia produced by the armed conflict and the provision of specialized services for victims.  In regards to the investment to attend sexual violence, the INML has manifested that there is a “total gap between the social investment during 2004, in comparison with the resources destined for national defense and executed through the armed forces.”[201]  To support this premise, the INML compared the budget assigned on 2004 to the National Defense, a total of 76 billion of Colombian pesos, in contrast to the budget of the Social Solidarity Network, a total of 150 thousand millions.[202]

 

177.     Another concern highlighted by both State and non-State authorities about the public programs is their limited territorial presence, in particular, their notable absence in the zones occupied by the actors of the armed conflict.  For example, the reform of the domestic violence law, through the Law 575 of 2000, transferred the competencies to dictate protection orders to the Family Commissions.  However, several sources confirmed that there are not sufficient Commissions to cover the needs of all municipalities in the country.  For example, the Rapporteur received information confirming that only 222 exist for the 1,080 municipalities in the country and only 82 have a multidisciplinary team.[203]  The Office of the Ombudsman for the Rights of Children, Women and the Family in Colombia shared with the Rapporteur its concern over the closing of many of these Commissions, as well as the disincentive to create new ones, which decreases the existence of important avenues to access justice. 

 

178.     However, the Rapporteur learned in her interviews with State and non-State authorities of coordination efforts between the government, international agencies and the civil society to attend victims of the violence and discrimination produced by the armed conflict.  For example, the Rapporteur received information from the Office of the Attorney General about its collaboration and articulation with the OFP to document cases in zones occupied by the armed actors.  The Rapporteur was also informed about efforts on behalf of different State agencies to design collaboration programs with United Nations agencies, such as the program of the Office of the Procurator with UNIFEM to attend displaced women.  Nevertheless, it is visible how these efforts are insufficient and how the initiatives undertaken, mostly by civil society organizations, to offer needed services for victims, such as those provided by PROFAMILIA in the area of sexual and reproductive rights, do not have sufficient recognition and support from the Colombian State.

 

C.        Flaws in the diagnosis and prevention of the consequences of the armed conflict on women

 

179.     One of the major gaps the Rapporteur observed during her visit was in the area of prevention and diagnosis of the specific consequences of the armed conflict on all women, throughout its national territory, especially pertaining to the legislative and public policy framework and the collection of statistics. The IACHR highlights the key and positive efforts from the Colombian State to collect statistics about the existing gender inequalities and the situation of violence against women in Colombia, such as the Observatory of Gender Issues launched by the Presidential Office on Gender Equality and the efforts of the INML.  Another recognizable achievement has been the incorporation of a gender perspective in the analysis of the statistics gathered by DANE.  Furthermore, the Colombian State informed the IACHR about the National Information System for registering and consolidating national statistics on domestic violence, child abuse and sexual abuse.[204]  The IACHR recognizes these initiatives as a good beginning to obtain an adequate diagnosis of the situation and to design adequate prevention and early warning systems.

 

180.     However, several State authorities, including the Vice Minister of Multi-Lateral Affairs at the time, Jaime Girón, and non-State sources, communicated to the delegation the existence of serious problems to collect figures and statistics that accurately reflect the magnitude of the situation because there is no uniform, reliable statistics system.  The Rapporteur also corroborated during the visit the lack of statistics disaggregated by risk factors faced by different groups of women, based on their race and ethnic background, among others.  This deficiency contributes to keeping acts of violence and discrimination by the armed actors invisible and limits the scope and effectiveness of State actions oriented towards prevention and early warning. 

 

181.     Furthermore, it is noteworthy that most programs concentrate on statistics of acts occurring in urban and central areas rather than areas occupied by the armed actors.  The Vice Ministry of Multi-Lateral Affairs and the Presidential Office on Gender Equality also communicated to the Rapporteur what they perceive as a challenge in collecting figures and statistics of acts of violence and control that occur in the zones occupied by the actors in the conflict.  Furthermore, during the visit of the Rapporteur to Valledupar and Quibdó, different State and non-State sources expressed their concern at the scarcity of reliable figures on different forms of violence and discrimination perpetrated by actors of the armed conflict, especially in regards to the special effect of the conflict on Afro-Colombian and indigenous women.

 

182.     The IACHR also verified the lack of a State policy incorporating prevention as a priority strategy, reflected both nationally and locally.  The application of the present legislative and public policy framework is not achieving the effective prevention of these problems, reflected in the information and testimonies received during the visit.  Additionally, several non-State sources shared with the Rapporteur their concern over the fact that the State does not implement or invest sufficiently in activities to sensitize the population to eliminate discriminatory sociocultural patterns based on sex, race and ethnicity that promote that the actors of the armed conflict abuse women. 

 

D.        Homogenous perspective and view of women as a target group benefiting from State protection and services destined to mitigate the impact of the armed conflict on them

 

183.     The Rapporteur and the IACHR corroborated during the visit the State’s homogeneous view of women as a group benefiting from public policies, which has resulted in a response that fails to consider the particular needs of different groups, such as those of Afro-Colombian and indigenous women.  This absence poses challenges to understand the magnitude of how the conflict affects these groups of women and the design of legislation and policies oriented to prevent, investigate, sanction and offer reparation to the human rights violations that affect them, pursuant to the obligation of the Colombian State to act with due diligence.  In this regard, the High Commissioner for Human Rights manifested in its 2004 report the following:

 

The security, particularly of rural, indigenous and Afro-Colombian women and girls and of those who are organized, displaced, confined or are returnees, has deteriorated as a result of the armed conflict and the use of sexual violence and social control by the illegal armed groups. In spite of efforts by the State, weaknesses persist in gathering information on the specific situation of women; this affects its ability to respond appropriately to their needs. [205]

 

184.     For example, the Rapporteur observed at the national and local level the failure to include the specific needs of indigenous and Afro-Colombian women in public programs and policies geared toward protecting the rights of women.  Indigenous and Afro-Colombian women are conspicuously absent from the implementation of the policy for Mujeres Constructoras de Paz y Seguridad, the programs of the Presidential Office on Gender Equality and the initiatives to collect statistics on situations of violence confronted by women.  The ICBF communicated to the delegation its concern that the State policy is mainly designed to address the needs of sectors, such as women, and not of population groups with different needs, such as indigenous peoples and Afro-Colombian groups.

 

185.     Moreover, their needs are absent from the laws and public policies destined to mitigate the impact of the armed conflict in their racial and ethnic groups.  For example, in the case of Afro-Colombian women, the groups and networks interviewed during the visit to Quibdó and Bogotá expressed their concern over the absence of the specific needs of women in Law 70 of 1993 and in decree CONPES 3310,[206] both intended to improve the civil, political, economic and social conditions of Afro-Colombian communities.

 

186.     The 1991 Constitution establishes that Colombia is a multi-ethnic and multi-cultural country and recognizes the specific rights of the different ethnic groups that exist.  This gave rise to the enactment of Law 70 of 1993, which recognizes the Afro-Colombian population as an ethnic group and sets guidelines to protect their cultural identity and rights.  Therefore, the Law is a major achievement, as it brings this group out of obscurity nationwide and recognizes their differences.  Among the most important principles for the Afro-Colombian community in this Law are that the State grants them collective ownership of the areas that they have been occupying, according to their traditional production practices.  Furthermore, the Decree CONPES 3310 also provides for a number of affirmative actions to improve the condition of these groups.  However, both policies address Afro-Colombians as a homogenous group, without considering the specific needs that Afro-Colombian women may have because of their sex.

 

187.     The Rapporteur learned of some efforts and good practices that reflect future progress in incorporating these specific needs.  For example, during the meeting between the delegation and the Governor’s Office in Valledupar, the Rapporteur found that support for populations from different ethnic groups, such as indigenous communities, had been incorporated as a priority in their current development plan.  Moreover, national entities such as the Social Solidarity Network communicated to the Rapporteur their intention to incorporate the specific needs of Afro-Colombian and indigenous women in initiatives to gather statistics, as well as programs designed to meet the needs of displaced women belonging to these groups. Furthermore, the IACHR has received information which confirms that the Presidential Office on Gender Equality is currently promoting the design of a Plan de Acción para las Mujeres Indígenas with the participation of indigenous women from across country, aimed at identifying the problems that have to be overcome in achieving the protection of their rights.[207]  According to the State, the elaboration and validation of this Action Plan took place through three regional meetings of indigenous women which attempted to “generate space for dialogue and socialize the importance of the actions that indigenous women are working on in their communities.”[208]
 

E.        Gaps in the humanitarian assistance and support services for victims: response to forced displacement

 

188.     During the visit, a series of advances and challenges were noted in the response of the Colombian State to the humanitarian crisis promoted and reproduced by the conflict, especially in regard to the phenomenon of displacement and its specific impact on women.   The IACHR has reiterated in the past that the presence of displaced persons in the national territory means that the State itself must take primary responsibility for guaranteeing their safety and well-being.[209]  As mentioned previously, the IACHR in its 1999 report highlighted principle 19(2) of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, which refers directly to the situation of women, establishing that: "Special attention should be paid to the health needs of women, including access to female health care providers and services, such as reproductive health care, as well as appropriate counseling for victims of sexual and other abuses."[210]  

 

189.     Among the advances is the presence of a legislative and public policy framework and State programs to address the psycho-affective, economic and social needs of the displaced population, including the System of Integral Attention for the Population Displaced by Violence (hereinafter “SNAIPD”), Law 387 of 1997 and the National Plan for the Integral Attention of the Displaced Population.  It is also important to recognize the creation of the Social Solidarity Network as the entity specialized and responsible for the coordination of the SNAIPD.  According to the State authorities interviewed, the integral assistance for the displaced population includes four components: development and consolidation of prevention and protection programs; provision of emergency humanitarian care; socio-economic stabilization; and the development and consolidation of the SNAIPD.

 

190.     Advances have been noted in the improvement of the SNAIPD, a Registry for the Displaced Population has been launched, and there has been increased attention to the population throughout the territory with the establishment of field offices of the Social Solidarity Network.[211]  The High Commissioner for Human Rights also reported that in 2004 the budget of the Social Solidarity Network increased considerably and the Network implemented major efforts in providing emergency humanitarian aid and strengthening care and orientation units.[212]

 

191.     However, shortcomings in the support of the displaced population are evident, above all highlighted in the Sentence T-025, issued by the Constitutional Court on January 22 of 2004, which addresses a number of rights of the displaced population that are being infringed in Colombia, and the need for the State to ensure a minimum level of protection for these people.  The decision identified the minimum level of protection that the displaced population should receive from the State, including a series of rights relevant to women, such as the right to be registered, to receive special protection, to receive immediate assistance for three months, to receive a document accrediting her registration in a health facility, to return in safe conditions and to identify specific circumstances in her personal situation to define how to generate income, among other rights.   

 

192.     For women, this decision is extremely importantly since the Court expressly establishes “the importance of consulting the opinion of women in the definition of humanitarian assistance programs, the need to overcome an assistance-driven perspective that reinforces and reproduces discriminatory practices against women and the relevance of formulating a public policy providing differentiated attention, in two key aspects: including sex as a suspect criteria of discrimination for the interpretation of Law 387 of 1997 and to adapt information systems to have updated data disaggregated by sex.”[213]   

 

193.     Moreover, the Court advised that “the registration systems are not sensitive to the identification of the specific needs of those displaced that pertain to groups with an increased level of vulnerability such as women heads of household and ethnic groups.”[214]  The Court explicitly establishes that displaced women or heads of household that dedicate all of their time and efforts to care for minor children or older adults under their responsibility, have the right to receive humanitarian assistance until the “extraordinary urgency has ceased or until the subjects are capable of economically supporting themselves or are in conditions to do so.”[215] 

 

194.     As a follow-up to the principles included in this Sentence, the Colombian State adopted the new Plan de Atención al Desplazamiento Forzado and the Document CONPES 3400 of 2005, that set the goals and prioritization of resources to address the needs of the displaced population, assign a higher level of responsibility to territorial entities to ensure an integral response to the problem, and creates mechanisms that favor the participation of the displaced population in the design and evaluation of the public policies.

 

195.     The IACHR highlights the need for public policies to address the specific needs of displaced women and the principles included in the Sentence T-025.  In particular, it calls on the Colombian State to incorporate the participation of women in the formulation of public policies and in the adoption of an adequate level of protection to the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of the displaced women and heads of household, in the short and long-term.  Lastly, it is relevant to emphasize the need of the Colombian State to adopt the necessary measures to ensure the participation of organizations of women in the systemic follow-up of compliance with this Sentence. 

 

196.     A range of United Nations and non-State sources confirmed during the visit the non-inclusion of the specific needs of women in policies to attend the displaced population, above all in the spheres of health and economic subsistence.  The Social Solidarity Network even recognizes that there are limits to a differentiated and specialized attention that they can provide to vulnerable population groups such as women, Afro-Colombians and indigenous peoples and the entire displaced population. Among the difficulties identified by the Network are the challenge of providing assistance to women in finding employment, which means that most perform domestic work and to provide psycho-social support to assist displaced women in handling the cultural changes and the effects of violence.  

 

197.     State and non-State authorities also highlighted the noticeable absence of institutional coordination that challenges the synergy among existing efforts and services and the absence of resources to provide a specialized attention for women.  Even though there has been progress in consolidating an attention system, a better definition of policies and commitments by the relevant entities is needed, in particular the departments and municipalities.  The Social Solidarity Network, for example, recognized that more coordination is needed with other State entities, such as the Presidential Office on Gender Equality and the National Service for Learning. 

 

198.     Representatives of State agencies in Valledupar and Quibdó also mentioned the lack of resources to provide an integral care for women, including psycho-social support and sexual and reproductive health services. The Sentence of the Constitutional Court T-025 stated that “resources assigned to the displaced population correspond to 0.04% of the total budget.  This does not take into account the fact that, according to certain calculations, the number of displaced persons in Colombia is 4.3% of the total population.”[216]  In addition, the Social Solidarity Network highlighted the need to design impact indicators to better understand the situation of displaced women and to disaggregate them by major variables such as race and ethnic group.

 

199.     During the meeting of the Rapporteur with the Social Solidarity Network, the Network communicated to the delegation that they are working to provide an integral approach to the specific needs of women, pursuant to the Sentence T-025, especially for pregnant and breastfeeding women, in the form of food and “basic kits” and the program Familias en Acción.  They are also participating in projects with international organizations such as the International Organization for Migration to identify the specific needs of displaced women and they are preparing a program with ICBF to meet the specific needs of displaced women, including psycho-social support.  Another major advance in achieving an integral and multi-disciplinary approach is a consensus-based questionnaire, agreed upon among different entities serving different sectors, namely the Social Solidarity Network, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, CODHES, and the Catholic Church, to assess the institutional response to the displacement phenomenon.

 

200.     Other difficulties in the provision of State services that were identified by non-State entities were, for example, deficiencies in emergency humanitarian care, which is provided late and is of a palliative nature, and the bureaucratic barriers displaced women face when registering, such as those displaced from fumigation zones because they have to travel long distances.   An investigation of the Observatory of the Human Rights of Women also revealed that key problems in the assistance provided include a lack of policies for prevention, sustainable economic re-establishment, in line with the needs and expectations of the persons affected, and the access to adequate health services.[217] 

 

201.     One key problem with the emergency assistance discussed by the Observatory of the Human Rights of Women is its temporary nature, especially in regards to health.  If the person remains affiliated with some health program at the time of the displacement, the contract remains in effect for one year, even if they cannot continue paying the fees.  Once the emergency phase is over, the receiving territory must take over the assistance within the period during which the person is recognized as beneficiary, one year, according to the norms of the National Registry of the Displaced Population.  Therefore, these timeframes fail to take into account the process of adaptation and socio-economic re-establishment of displacement victims.[218]  In many cases, women also require more specialized treatment, with medicines not included in the Plan Obligatorio de Salud (hereinafter “POS”), especially in regard to sexual and reproductive health.[219]  The Rapporteur received information regarding women’s possible exposure to mistreatment in the few health centers where they can receive medical care, and the far distance of the health centers from their settlements.

 

202.     The Rapporteur has also received information from the Social Solidarity Network and ICBF indicating that when the national registry was designed, racial and ethnic variables were not considered.  Therefore, current support services and programs for women do not consider the specific needs of indigenous and Afro-Colombian women, especially at the national level.  However, the Rapporteur does recognize the political will of these agencies and their understanding that the needs of displaced women require specialized services from the Colombian State, especially in the area of sexual and reproductive health.

 

F.         Obstacles to access justice

 

203.     A number of State and non-State sources manifested their concern to the Rapporteur over the main obstacles that women face to access justice when they are victims of violence and discrimination resulting from the armed conflict.  The obstacles can be of a legislative, institutional, cultural and geographic nature.  For example, the High Commissioner for Human Rights in its 2004 report about the situation in Colombia described the problem as follows:

 

The majority of violations of the rights of women and girls remain unpunished, due to a lack of official investigations, the low number of complaints because of shame, lack of credibility of the justice system, and underreporting in cases of death or sexual violence. Access to the courts and the manner in which such crimes are dealt with have also been affected by the absence of training programmes for court officials on gender issues, as well as by sexist practices in the justice system, especially in penal matters.[220]

 

204.     The IACHR observed in general the lack of an integral vision and policy, sustained by adequate human and financial resources from the Colombian State, to investigate, sanction and offer reparation in the sphere of justice to acts of violence and discrimination that women suffer as a result of the armed conflict in all zones of the country.  Among the most notable challenges are deficiencies in the investigation, judgment and sanction of acts of violence and discrimination, gaps in systems to gather statistics and the dearth of human and financial resources to address the persisting problems.  Furthermore, the IACHR highlights the need to establish sustainable capacity-building programs for justice officials and to begin programs to sensitize the population and to promote an increase in the filing of complaints.  Lastly, the IACHR observes the weaknesses of the administration of justice in the zones occupied by the actors in the armed conflict and the implementation of alarming principles and practices within the penal procedures applicable to violence against women that can challenge the access by women to effective judicial protection and guarantees.  

 

1.         Deficiencies in the legal framework

 

205.     Several State and non-State sources confirmed that, in practice, the legal framework to protect the rights of women is not implemented to their benefit and fails to address their specific needs within the armed conflict, above all, in the criminal sphere.  A number of sources, including the Office of the Ombudsman for the Rights of Children, Women and the Family, shared with the Rapporteur some principles incorporated within the system of criminal justice relevant to the rights of women, after the reforms of 2000 and 2004[221], that have the potential of challenging the access of women to effective judicial protections and guarantees when they are victims of different forms of violence.  The changes reflect the absence of sensibility and knowledge of the situation of vulnerability and lack of protection of victims of violence before their aggressors and victimizers.  In regards to sexual violence particularly, there is a gap between the protections and objectives incorporated in the legal framework and an effective attention and control of the problem.

 

206.     The most recent reform to the Penal Code adopted in 2004, which entered into force in 2005, establishes the parameters of application of the opportunity principle, in which the relevant Prosecutors can decide according to general criteria which crimes they investigate and which they do not in the area of violence against women.  The degree of discretion granted to the relevant Prosecutors facilitates that in the decision whether to investigate a crime, their beliefs and personal attitudes play a crucial role.  This principle ignores the situation of vulnerability and danger the victims of violence face, as well as the silence that can cloud these incidents, for fear of reprisals by the aggressor and the fear of the victim to be publicly stigmatized. 

 

207.     The Rapporteur also learned of alarming provisions regarding the “chain of custody”[222] in cases of violence, which were reaffirmed by the reform of 2004, for its major emphasis on physical evidence.   The Rapporteur received information indicating that the procedures are designed only for physical evidence and ignore the key role of other types of proof to support cases of violence against women, such as psychological proof in cases of sexual violence. 

 

208.     In the specific sphere of domestic violence, a crime worsened by forced displacement, according to the reform of the Penal Procedure Code in the year 2000, women are obligated to personally file the complaint of the crime, which is referred to as querella de parte before the Office of the Attorney General.   This reform does not consider that domestic violence victims are frequently incapable of demanding by themselves the protection and recognition of their rights, due to the threats they suffer by their partners, as well as the fear of stigmatization.  The law also allows the person who commits the crime of domestic violence in violation of a protection order to return to the household where he committed the crimes, without taking into account the dangers this poses for the family group.  On the other hand, the reform of 2004 additionally subjects domestic violence victims to a public and oral trial to expose the aggressions they faced and to defend their rights before their aggressors.

 

209.     The reform of 2000 also characterizes domestic violence as a crime that the victim can desist from, which does not consider the reasons that could motivate a victim to withdraw a complaint, including threats from the aggressor and the fear of stigmatization by her community.   Additionally, the crime can be subject to a process of conciliation, in which it can be negotiated between the victim and the perpetrator.  The conciliation option assumes that all parties involved are on equal grounds to negotiate, which is not the case in the sphere of domestic violence.   It is recognized internationally that conciliation in cases of domestic violence is not advisable.[223]  In several countries, it has been clear that agreements reached in the framework of mediation increase the emotional and physical risk of women, because of the inequality in power relations between the victim and the aggressor.[224]   The aggressor usually does not comply with the agreements and these do not address the causes and consequences of the violence.[225]   

 

210.     The Rapporteur also learned of concerns regarding Law 882 of 2004, better known as the Ley de Ojos Morados, which excluded sexual violence from the crime of domestic violence, thus, considering that sexual abuse constitutes physical abuse that is already sanctioned without the need for specificity.  This norm was denounced as unconstitutional by the Office of the Ombudsman, but the Constitutional Court dismissed the arguments and declared it constitutional.   The High Commissioner for Human Rights has manifested that this disposition, in addition to be contrary to the international law designed to protect the rights of women and girls from violence, underestimates sexual violence as a specialized and serious problem, ignores its systematic practice, and minimizes this gender-based violation, thereby fostering impunity.[226]

 

211.     In regards to sexual violence, despite the State efforts to enact legislation, public policies and institutions, several State and non-State sources indicated that they do not perceive significant advances that facilitate an effective control of the problem.  The Office of the Attorney General confirmed to the delegation of the Commission that on 2004 there were a total of 9,084 pending investigations for sexual crimes, of which 89.16% corresponded to female victims.  Some of the challenges identified in the application and implementation of the existing legislative framework has been the scarce creation of the units to attend sexual violence throughout the national territory and of trained professionals to perform sexology exams, mostly in rural areas and in zones where the actors of the armed conflict exercise control.[227]  Therefore, there is a gap between the protections and objectives included in the legislative framework to address sexual violence and an effective control of the problem.  

 

2.         Persistence of discriminatory socio-cultural patterns

 

212.     In information provided to the IACHR, the Colombian State has recognized that:

 

The most recurring challenge to prevent, protect and sanction violence is the persistence of sexist tendencies, where violence against women has a high degree of acceptance[228]

 

213.     The IACHR has corroborated from the information and testimonies gathered that violence and discrimination against women are still accepted in Colombian society, which is reflected in the response of the officials of the administration of justice towards victims of violence against women and the treatment of these cases.  The Rapporteur received information about the fear of the victims to be re-victimized by the system of justice and the mistrust that what they have suffered as a consequence of the conflict can be investigated, sanctioned or be subject to reparations.  Other factors that impede women to denounce acts of violence include the fear of being stigmatized socially by making the crime public and the lack of knowledge of available judicial recourses.  Consequently, it is evident that the Colombian State needs to create additional capacity-building programs for officials of the administration of justice and to implement campaigns to sensitize the general public about the gravity of these crimes and the importance of filing complaints. 

 

214.        Non-governmental organizations such as CLADEM and PROFAMILIA, as well as representatives from United Nations agencies, communicated to the Rapporteur their concern over the mistrust that the judicial authorities have towards victims and what they relate as crimes against them or their families.[229]  The following two testimonies were offered to the Rapporteur during the visit, which illustrate the treatment received by women, when they or their relatives have been victims of violence and they try to access justice: 

 

The victims claim that they do not report for fear of being persecuted; moreover, they do not trust any organ or institution to file a complaint or to seek assistance of a psychological, economic or judicial nature…..Due to the patriarchal conception of justice and in the operators, who do not equally enforce due process guarantees to crimes such as sexual abuse and domestic violence, under the rubric of procedural doubt.  Furthermore, there is a manipulation of the proof, because the Office of the Attorney General has no interest to collect and review proof before the crimes committed by the armed actors.[230]

 

Most evident has been the impunity of all situations of human rights violations faced by women in the region…..when women know where to seek help, they go to entities to request the required certifications to access subsidies they are entitled to due to the violent death of their loved ones as a result of the armed conflict.  They receive from the Office of the Attorney General, organ entrusted with the investigation of violent deaths, responses such as “Throw Fire to That”.  The women feel more mistreated by the institutions than by the same actors that harmed them.  Another factor that leads to impunity is the mistrust of the women in these institutions, in the case of the Office of the Attorney General concretely…..There was the case of a woman who submitted facts for the preparation of verbal portraits of the murderers of her husband and son and after the complaint was prepared, she was threatened that same afternoon.  This was the only institution that had knowledge of the case in detail [emphasis added].[231]

 

215.     Amnesty International recently described in detail how the fear of being revictimized by the system and the mistrust that the aggressor will be really sanctioned, discourages victims of sexual violence to present complaints before the justice system:  

 

Sexual violence is rarely reported by the victim.  In those cases in which survivors muster the strength to do so, the authorities often seek to dissuade the women from doing so…….Even if they persist, the case is unlikely to be fully and independently investigated.  The prospect of a conviction is virtually zero, especially if the alleged perpetrator is a member of the security forces, the paramilitaries or the guerrilla.  Every step of the process appears to be designed to block survivors’ attempts to seek truth and justice.[232]  

 

216.     The Rapporteur corroborated during her visit that the authorities entrusted with administering justice, at the national and local levels, tend to assume that when a victim withdraws a complaint this means that the crime has not occurred.  This type of presumption and conclusion ignores the multiple motives that can lead a victim of violence not to report a crime, including mistrust in the administration of justice, the potential stigmatization of her family and community, and the fear that the aggressor may exercise reprisals against her or her family.  

 

217.     Additionally, non-State sources communicated to the Rapporteur their concern over the social stigma that can suffer a violence victim, above all from sexual violence, which discourages women to report abuses by the actors in the conflict.  The victims can be rejected by their communities, families, partners and often receive death threats by the illegal armed actors when they report cases.  When the sexual violence has been produced in zones where the armed actors impose norms and punishments, the community can find that what occurred is the fault of the victim for violating the rules.  This factor contributes to a high level of under-reporting of cases of violence against women, reflected in the statistics.  In the year 2000, the Office of the Attorney General conducted 21,189 investigations for sexual crimes, however, the State estimates that these only represent between 5 to 10% of the cases.[233] 

 

218.     The Rapporteur learned of valuable efforts from the Colombian State to train officials of the administration of justice.  It is important to highlight the initiative of the Consejo Superior de la Judicatura and the Escuela Judicial Rodrigo Lara Bonilla in the creation of a Training and Capacity-Building Plan with a gender perspective that has as a goal to train 15,000 administration of justice officials between 2002 and 2006.[234]  It is also important to highlight the organization of specialized workshops in the subject with the support of the Women, Gender and Justice Program of the United Nations Latin American Institute for the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (hereinafter “ILANUD”), one of the entities in the region with extensive capacity-building experience in these themes.  These initiatives are a good start to develop effective capacity-building programs in the theme that are sustainable and can be institutionalized.   Representatives from the Office of the Attorney General communicated to the Rapporteur the need to increase and strengthen capacity-building programs for administration of justice officials to effectively address cases of violence against women and discrimination and to treat victims with sensibility and respect. 

 

219.     The Rapporteur also recognizes the efforts of the Presidential Office on Gender Equality to implement sensitization campaigns to the general public about violence against women.  However, the Rapporteur encourages the State to assign a larger amount of resources to increase the territorial coverage and the specificity of these awareness-raising actions.  The Office of the Attorney General communicated to the Rapporteur the need on behalf of the State to strengthen the communications work to promote the social respect of the human rights of vulnerable populations such as women within the armed conflict. 

 

220.     Therefore, it is crucial that the Colombian State continues to implement concrete measures, such as capacity-building programs and awareness-raising campaigns, to eradicate discriminatory socio-cultural patters on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity and social class to promote that women report acts of violence and discrimination and receive a humane and dignified treatment by judicial authorities. 

 

3.        Deficiencies in the investigation, judgment and sanction of acts of violence and discrimination on the basis of gender and in the creation of safe conditions for the reporting of crimes

 

221.     The IACHR in the past has recommended to the Colombian State the exercise of due diligence to ensure that all cases of violence and discrimination against women are subject to a prompt, complete and impartial investigation, as well as the adequate sanction of those responsible and the reparation of the victims.[235]   However, during the visit, a variety of State and non-State sources voiced their concern over the inefficacy of the justice system to effectively investigate and sanction cases of violence against women that occur as a consequence of the armed conflict, especially those perpetrated by the actors of the conflict and in zones under their control.  The United Nations Rapporteur after its visit highlighted that the failure to investigate, process and punish those responsible for violations and other forms of violence on the basis of gender, has contributed to creating in Colombia a climate of impunity that perpetuates violence against women and contributes to an increase of the violence in general.[236]

222.     The Rapporteur learned of a series of challenges in the documentation and investigation of cases of violence and discrimination.  For example, the Office of the Attorney General communicated to the Rapporteur its challenge in documenting cases of violence against women and abuses, especially in areas of the country where the victims fear reprisals when they report acts of violence and how the life of Prosecutors is endangered when they work in these zones.  Moreover, the creation of safety conditions to facilitate that women report sexual violence acts and to prevent that crimes remain in impunity constitutes a challenge.[237] 

 

223.     Additionally, the scarcity of resources assigned to address cases of violence and discrimination against women limits the territorial scope of the existing programs of the administration of justice.  For example, in Valledupar, the Community Ombudsman confirmed that they only have one Attorney for the Department of César and Guajira.  They confirmed the existence of multiple attacks of illegal groups and forced displacements that are not registered and the challenge in providing permanent assistance to women in this limiting context.

 

224.     However, the IACHR recognizes a series of efforts, especially by the Office of the Attorney General, to effectively address these cases.  Representatives from the Office, for example, explained to the Rapporteur how the subject of gender has gained key importance in their work and how special units have been created, including a special unit for trafficking persons.  A center to attend cases of domestic violence has also been created.  The Office of the Attorney General is committed to offering effective services throughout the territory, despite the challenges mentioned and the danger faced by the Prosecutors when they perform their duties in zones occupied by the actors of the conflict.  The Office of the Attorney General shared with the Rapporteur good examples of collaboration with non-governmental organizations such as the OFP, who supports their work in the areas of documentation and attention in areas particularly affected by the armed conflict such as Barrancabermeja.  However, the Office of the Attorney General recognized the need to strengthen the actions of the administration of justice in mitigating the effects of the armed conflict on women, by developing an integral and specific response, as well as a larger assignment of resources. 

 

G.       The need to protect and legitimize the work of women’s rights defenders

 

225.     Colombia stands out for the organizational experiences of groups of women who wish to participate and influence the public agenda, both in areas traditionally linked to the specific needs of women as in issues related to the resolution of the armed conflict.  However, as has been manifested in the past by the High Commissioner of Human Rights and the Untied Nations Rapporteur, this type of participation has become an extremely dangerous activity in which women’s rights defenders and their loved ones are exposed to multiple violations of their human rights. [238]  In fact, armed actors find that the leadership exercised by women’s rights organizations challenges the extent of their social and territorial control, which – the IACHR believes – has led to the systematic intimidation, persecution, kidnapping, torture and sexual abuse of representatives of organizations that work to protect the rights of women and their families, among other crimes. 

 

226.     The Mesa de Trabajo Mujer y Conflicto Armado has identified as a form of violence when national and regional organizations of women, especially those acting in war zones, are subjected to harassment and threats, affecting both their members and the community work they conduct.[239]  Armed actors find that the leadership exercised by women’s rights organizations limits the extent of their increasing social and territorial control in certain areas of the country.[240]  The following testimony illustrates the situations of violence that representatives of the organizations defending the rights of women face and the impact on their relatives and communities:

 

I am the daughter of a member from [……] in the municipality of Viota Cundinamarca and now, because of what has happened, I am working directly in the office of the Association in Bogotá, who despite the difficulties, have supported me at all times….. When the paramilitary invasion began by the Rural Self-Defense Groups of Casanare, in the municipality where my mother, little sister and I lived, on March 8, 2003, my mother was in the fields when a group of unidentified men came to the neighborhood, asking about “la paisa”, referring to my mother.  When she was identified, these men – two of them wearing hoods – handcuffed her and took her to the pickup truck of death, which was what they called it in our town, and took her away.  My little sister, who saw everything, was threatened with a rifle and forced to shut up. She saw them take my mother away. From that time on, I started to search for her, but we have not learned anything about her to this day.  Since then, and without any experience, I have become the head of household for my sisters, since my mother was separated and she was our sole breadwinner. We were obligated to move to Bogotá to save our lives, but lost everything. In Bogotá, the Organization has helped us, because the threats continue [..] We need protection, but we know that the State is not going to give us any.[241]

 

227.     In view of this unsafe context, the High Commissioner for Human Rights has recommended to the Colombian State:

 

To strengthen programs for protection of human rights advocates with the Ministry of the Interior and to search, jointly with other State institutions, new mechanisms to reduce risk factors and act preventively to eliminate them… Accordingly, it is fundamental for programs and mechanisms to respond adequately to the needs of organizations that defend the rights of women and the needs of their members, so they may continue working to promote and defend their rights.[242]

 

228.     Among the organizations most severely affected and threatened are those conformed by rural, indigenous, Afro-Colombian and displaced women: the OFP and ANMUCIC, both beneficiaries of precautionary measures granted by the IACHR, the Liga de Mujeres Desplazadas and the Casa de la Mujer.  Just the OFP has suffered nearly 120 incidents, including attacks, threats, and disappearances.  The members of these organizations and their families have been subjected to systematic acts of intimidation, persecution, kidnapping, torture and sexual abuse, among other crimes.  The representatives of these organizations and their relatives have been obligated to abandon their regions, quit their organizational work and even leave the country.  Women who belong to certain political parties or movements, such as the Patriotic Union have also been victims of persecution and selective assassinations because of their political views.

 

229.     In addition to working to protect the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of women, these organizations perform a crucial role in the areas of services and case documentation.  In zones where the armed actors are present, these organizations provide assistance to victims of violence and reproductive health services.  Some of the organizations carrying out these activities are the Iniciativa de las Mujeres por la Paz, the Liga de Mujeres Desplazadas, the OFP, ANMUCIC and PROFAMILIA, among other entities.  The UNDP communicated to the Rapporteur during her visit that this important work does not receive the social recognition it deserves.

 

230.     Moreover, phenomena such as forced displacement pose major challenges to the activities and organizational processes of women.  For example, the groups and networks of women interviewed by the Rapporteur in Quibdó described as follows the impact of forced displacement on their organizational efforts:

 

The organizational processes that women have begun implementing in their communities tend to disappear, because they focus their attention on how to survive; and it would seem that the idea of organization makes no more sense, because it is not viewed as a useful strategy to resolve the problems they face in these circumstances.[243]

 

231.     The IACHR reiterates the need to legitimize and protect the actions of these groups, whose existence and work is threatened by the actors of the armed conflict.  The State does not sufficiently acknowledge the importance of the work of these organizations, who represent the interests of women in the public life, and who provide key services within the zones occupied by the actors of the armed conflict.[244]  The Rapporteur reiterates the observations of the United Nations Rapporteur regarding this situation:

 

The State should provide greater support and protection for human rights that work with women and on women’s human rights issues.  The work currently underway in the areas of research and the production of materials on women’s rights, and the documentation of women’s experiences of conflict, is seen by certain actors as contentious and adequate thought needs to be given to addressing the risks to the people who conduct this work and to providing them with appropriate support.  Much valuable work is done in remote areas by women’s organizations at the grass-roots level and they deserve appropriate protection measures and support systems.  Tackling impunity and prosecuting gender-based violations will send a message that these crimes will be taken seriously. Serious priority and commitment must be devoted to understanding the risks, implementing preventive measures and providing protection. [245]

 

H.         Perspectives of truth, justice and reparation

 

232.     The IACHR has publicly stated that “establishing the truth about what happened during the conflict, searching seriously for justice through the determination of the responsibility of the perpetrators vis-a-vis the victims, and the reparation of the damage cause–far from generating obstacles for the agreements that can lead to peace building—constitute basic pillars of its strength.”[246]

233.     In the case of Colombian women, it is crucial that any process oriented towards peace contemplates the clarification and reparation of the acts of violence and discrimination they have suffered as part of the armed conflict.  Resolution 1325 of the United Nations Security Council underscores “the responsibility of all States to put an end to impunity and to prosecute those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes including those relating to sexual violence against women and girls, and in this regard, stresses the need to exclude these crimes, where feasible from amnesty provisions.”[247]  Similarly, the Convention of Belém do Pará urges States to establish the judicial and administrative measures necessary to ensure that women who have been subjected to violence will have effective access to restitution, reparation of the damage, or other just, effective means of compensation.

 

234.     The IACHR has ascertained that for Colombian women truth, justice and reparations are indispensable prerequisites for any negotiation process destined to resolve the Colombian armed conflict.[248]  This need has been described by Colombian women’s groups before the IACHR as follows:

 

the recovery of dissident memories in the official history and to rebuild the circumstances of past acts from all viewpoints. Consciously making the memory of a particular group invisible is done to ignore those traces of the past that can prevent the past from being idealized in the future.

 

genuine punishments must be applied to those guilty of serious human rights violations, to avoid impunity.  For this purpose, three rules must be respected: 1) society must know that the actions committed are serious crimes and that the persons condemned are responsible for committing them; 2) it is indispensable for non-combatants who suffered the effects of these crimes to have rights that society is obligated to protect; and 3) it is essential for recognition of responsibility for crimes to have a just consequence, through proportional punishment.[249]

 

235.     The IACHR has publicly stated its observations and concerns regarding the named Law of Justice and Peace, which establishes the legal framework for the access to procedural benefits by members of illegal armed groups which have been involved in the perpetration of serious crimes against the civil population in the context of the armed conflict.[250]  The State, on the other hand, states that the demobilization process which is part of the peace-building effort constitutes per se a manifestation of the fulfillment of its international obligations regarding human rights.[251]

 

236.     The IACHR recognizes the challenges confronted by the State to find a negotiated solution to the Colombian armed conflict.  In this context, it is indispensable that the State respects the rights of women, as well as those of other vulnerable groups in the clarification and sanction of acts of violence and discrimination that have occurred, as well as the adequate reparation of the harm done, through individual measures of restitution, indemnity and rehabilitation. 

 

 

[TABLE OF CONTENTS]


 


[180] IACHR, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (1999), Chapter XII: The Rights of Women; International Experts on Women’s Rights Express their Concern about the “Invisibility” of the Widespread Gender-Based Violence in Colombia, Press Release IACHR, 2 March 2002.

[181] IACHR, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (1999), Chapter XII: The Rights of Women; International Experts on Women’s Rights Express their Concern about the “Invisibility” of the Widespread Gender-Based Violence in Colombia, Press Release IACHR, 2 March 2002.

[182] Convention of Belém do Pará, Article 9.

[183] Ratified by Colombia on 31 July 1973.

[184] The Colombian State ratified the Rome Statute through Law 742 in 2002.  It should be noted that the State adhered to the statute conditionally, providing that the International Criminal Court would not have jurisdiction over war crimes during 7 years after 2002.

[185] Afterwards, the law was sanctioned by the President of the Republic and according to the principles of the National Constitution, the law has been sent to the Constitutional Court to conduct its previous assessment of  constitutionality.  

[186] Corporación Sisma Mujer, Report on Gender Justice: From the Armed Conflict to Judicial Reforms, Colombia 2001-2004, p. 16.

[187] See, for example, Sentences of the Constitutional Court: C 588 of 1992, C 622 of 1997, C710/96 – C470/97, C372 of 1998, C 098 of 1996, C 285 of 1997 and C 410 of 1994; C 481 of 1998, C 623 of 1998, C 507 of 1999, C 477 of 1997, C 112 of 2000, C 011 of 2002, C 092 of 2002, C 154 of 2002, C 157 of 2002, C 198 of 2002, C 578 of 2002, C 1033 of 2002, C 016 of 2004, C 102 of 2004, among others.

[188] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006. 

[189] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006, p. 5.

[190] Note DDH/OEA 25245/1210 from the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006.

[191] The State informed the IACHR that the Presidential Office currently leads a program of education on gender and diversity to promote “the transformation of sexist imaginaries and practices,” Note DDH/OEA 25245/1210  from the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006.

[192] The State reported to the IACHR that the Community Councils for Women are comprised of leaders from different organizations and community groups who include the governor’s wife, the mayor or competent official, the delegate of the women’s sector at the Territorial Planning Council, representatives of groups of women that are Afro-Colombian, rural, academics or teachers, entrepreneurs, indigenous, representatives of the labor sector (public or private), women elected by popular vote, associations of women heads of households and youth organizations. Note DDH/OEA 25245/1210 of the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006.

[193] A series of State entities participate in the formulation and development of the program Haz Paz including the Ministries of Social Protection, Education, Communications, Culture, Interior and Justice, the National Department of Planning, the Presidential Advisory Offices on Special Programs, particularly on Gender Equality, the ICBF, INML, the Office of the Ombudsman, the National Police, the Office of the Attorney General and Office of the Procurator. 

[194] Among the programs are: Casas de Justicia, Programa Nacional de Promotores de Convivencia y Centros de Convivencia Ciudadana (Ministry of Interior and Justice); Modelos de Atención para la Prevención, Detección y Tratamiento de la Violencia Doméstica en Instituciones Educativas (Ministry of Nacional Education with the ICBF); Proyecto de Autodeterminación Local (Presidency of the Republic–Office of the High Commissioner for Peace).

[195] National Institute of Legal Medicine, Publication 2004 Forensis: Data for Life, p. 161.

[196] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006. 

[197] Report by the Colombian State on the Implementation of the Beijing Platform of Action (1995) and findings of the Twenty-Third Special Period of Sessions of the General Assembly (2000), Álvaro Uribe-Vélez, President of the Republic, Carolina Barco-Isackson, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Martha Lucia Vázquez-Zawadsky, Presidential Office on Gender Equality, Bogotá, May 2004, p. 125.

[198] Report by the Colombian State on the Implementation of the Beijing Platform of Action (1995) and findings of the Twenty-Third Special Period of Sessions of the General Assembly (2000), Álvaro Uribe-Vélez, President of the Republic, Carolina Barco-Isackson, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Martha Lucia Vázquez-Zawadsky, Presidential Office on Gender Equality, Bogotá, May 2004, p. 20.

[199] Report by the Colombian State on the Implementation of the Beijing Platform of Action (1995) and findings of the Twenty-Third Special Period of Sessions of the General Assembly (2000), Álvaro Uribe-Vélez, President of the Republic, Carolina Barco-Isackson, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Martha Lucia Vázquez-Zawadsky, Presidential Office on Gender Equality, Bogotá, May 2004, p. 9.

[200] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006. 

[201] National Institute of Legal Medicine, Publication 2004 Forensis: Data for Life, p. 181.

[202] National Institute of Legal Medicine, Publication 2004 Forensis: Data for Life, p. 181.

[203] Confederación de Redes, Red Nacional de Mujeres y la Red de Educación Popular Entre Mujeres, One Step Forward, Two Backwards, Shadow Report, Platform of International Conference, Fourth World Conference on Women, 2004, p. 9.

[204] Note DDH/OEA 25245/1210 of the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006.

[205] United Nations, Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia, E/CN.4/2005/10, 28 February 2005, para. 124.

[206] National Council on Economic and Social Policy, National Planning Department, Document CONPES 3310, Affirmative Action Policy for the Black or Afro-Colombian Population, Bogotá, D.C., 20 September 2004.

[207] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006.

[208] Note DDH/OEA 25245 of the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006.

[209] IACHR, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (1999), Chapter VI, Forced Internal Displacement, para. 4.

[210] IACHR, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (1999), Chapter VI, Forced Internal Displacement, para. 4.

[211] United Nations Development Fund for Women, Report on the Situation of Women in Colombia, September 2005, p. 10.

[212] United Nations, Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia, E/CN.4/2005/10, 28 February 2005, Annex III, p. 62, para. 5.

[213] Sentence T-025 of 2004, Annex N˚5, subsets 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.12.

[214] Sentence T-025 of 2004, Annex N˚5, subset 6.3.1.3 ( c )

[215] Sentence T-025 of 2004, p. 77

[216] Sentence T-025 Constitutional Court, Annex N.5, Sub-section 1.1.

[217] Confluencia Nacional de Redes de Mujeres, Corporación Sisma Mujer, Atelier-IEPALA, Observatory of the Human Rights of Women,  Displaced Women: Actions of the Colombian Government, March 2004, p. 14.

[218] Confluencia Nacional de Redes de Mujeres, Corporación Sisma Mujer, Atelier-IEPALA, Observatory of the Human Rights of Women,  Displaced Women: Actions of the Colombian Government, March 2004, pp. 17-18.

[219] Confluencia Nacional de Redes de Mujeres, Corporación Sisma Mujer, Atelier-IEPALA, Observatory of the Human Rights of Women,  Displaced Women: Actions of the Colombian Government, March 2004, p. 18.

[220] United Nations, Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia, E/CN.4/2005/10, 28 February 2005, para. 99.

[221] Law 600, 2000 and Law 906, 2004.

[222] The  “chain of custody” includes a series of procedures to be followed by officials that perform physical tests, which have as their objective to preserve the physical evidence that serves as probatory until the moment of its judicial assessment.  Law 906 of 2004 conferred to the Office of the Attorney General the responsibility to completely regulate the requirements, duties, and responsibilities of the chain of custody.

[223] Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Inter-American Commission of Women of the Organization of American States (CIM/OAS), Inter-American Parliamentary Group on Population and Development (GPI), Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), IPAS, ISIS International, Latin American and Caribbean Committee on the Defense of the Rights of Women (CLADEM), Washington, DC, April 2004, Model Laws and Policies on Domestic Violence against Women, p. 20.

[224] Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Inter-American Commission of Women of the Organization of American States (CIM/OAS), Inter-American Parliamentary Group on Population and Development (GPI), Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), IPAS, ISIS International, Latin American and Caribbean Committee on the Defense of the Rights of Women (CLADEM), Washington, DC, April 2004, Model Laws and Policies on Domestic Violence against Women.

[225] Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), Inter-American Commission of Women of the Organization of American States (CIM/OAS), Inter-American Parliamentary Group on Population and Development (GPI), Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), IPAS, ISIS International, Latin American and Caribbean Committee on the Defense of the Rights of Women (CLADEM), Washington, DC, April 2004, Model Laws and Policies on Domestic Violence against Women.

[226] United Nations, Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia, para. 99.

[227] Corporación Sisma Mujer, Report on Gender Justice: From the Armed Conflict to Judicial Reforms, Colombia 2001-2004, p. 52.

[228] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006. 

[229] See Mesa de Trabajo de Mujer y Conflicto Armado, Report about the Sociopolitical Violence against Women, Girls and the Youth in Colombia, Bogotá, February 2003, p. 87.

[230] Testimonies collected by the Iniciativa de Mujeres Colombianas por la Paz in report Violence against Women in the Framework of the Armed Conflict, prepared by the Mesa Nacional de Incidencia por el Derecho a la Verdad, la Justicia y la Reparación con Perspectiva de Género, submitted to the IACHR Rapporteur during her on-site visit to Colombia.

[231] Report from the Iniciativa de Mujeres Colombianas por la Paz, Mesa Nacional de Incidencia, Región Norte de Santander about the negotiation process between the Government and the AUC, submitted to the IACHR Rapporteur during her on-site visit to Colombia.

[232] Amnesty International, Colombia, Scarred Bodies, Hidden Crimes: Sexual Violence against Women in the Armed Conflict, AMR 23/040/2004, pp. 63-64.

[233] Response of the Colombian State to Questionnaire on the Implementation of the Beijing Platform of Action (1995) and findings of the Twenty-Third Special Period of Sessions of the General Assembly (2000), Álvaro Uribe-Vélez, President of the Republic, Carolina Barco-Isackson, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Martha Lucia Vázquez-Zawadsky,  Presidential Office on Gender Equality, Bogotá, May 2004, p. 17.

[234] Response of the Colombian State to the IACHR Questionnaire on the Situation of Access to Justice for Women in the Americas, 27 January 2006. 

[235] IACHR, Third Report on the Human Rights Situation in Colombia (1999), Chapter XII, Rights of Women, Recommendations 6 and 7.

[236] See United Nations, Report submitted by Mrs. Radhika Coomaraswamy, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences: Mission to Colombia (1-7 November 2001), E/CN.4/2002/83/Add. 3, 11 March 2002.

[237] Mesa de Trabajo Mujer y Conflicto Armado, Report on Socio-Political Violence against Women, Youth and Girls in Colombia: Women and the Armed Conflict, October 2004, p. 81.

[238] See United Nations, Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia, E/CN.4/2005/10, 28 February 2005, para. 52; United Nations, Report submitted by Mrs. Radhika Coomaraswamy, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences: Mission to Colombia (1-7 November 2001), E/CN.4/2002/83/Add. 3, 11 March 2002, para. 93.

[239] Mesa de Trabajo Mujer y Conflicto Armado, Report on Socio-Political Violence against Women, Youth and Girls in Colombia: Women and the Armed Conflict, October 2004, p. 91-102.

[240] Confederación de Redes, Red Nacional de Mujeres y la Red de Educación Popular Entre Mujeres, One Step Forward, Two Backwards, Shadow Report, Platform of International Conference, Fourth World Conference on Women, 2004, p. 38.

[241] Testimony received by the Rapporteur during her on-site visit to Colombia.

[242] United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Colombia, speech by Mr. Michael Frühling, 2004, p. 14.

[243] Report: Chocó: Territory of Wealth and Survival: We Live to Resist, We Resist to Live, presented to the IACHR Rapporteur during her on-site visit by women’s groups and networks of Quibdó, p. 7.

[244] The Colombian State presented to the IACHR information indicating that it is developing mass media campaigns called: “Defend the Human Rights Defender” and “Human Rights, the Best Plan, Do it For You, Do it for All”. The purpose of these campaigns is to sensitize the public on the importance of the legal, legitimate and necessary work of human rights defenders.  It also informed the IACHR of an increase on the human rights program resources oriented towards the protection of persons, which includes organizations of women. Note CCH/OEA 25245/1210 of the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24 May 2006. Nevertheless, several sources confirmed during the visit that these types of initiatives are not sufficient to effectively protect these groups.  

[245] United Nations, Report submitted by Mrs. Radhika Coomaraswamy, Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences: Mission to Colombia (1-7 November 2001), E/CN.4/2002/83/Add. 3, 11 March 2002, para. 117.

[246] IACHR, Report on the Demobilization Process in Colombia, OAS/Ser.L/V/II.120, Doc. 60, 13 December 2004, p. 10-20; IACHR, Press Release, IACHR issues Statement regarding the Adoption of the “Law of Justice and Peace” in Colombia, Washington DC, Nº 26/05, July 15, 2005.

[247] See Resolution 1325 of the United Nations Security Council, S/RES/1325/2000.

[248] IACHR, Thematic Hearing, Colombian Women under the Armed Conflict: Justice for Women, 28 February 2005, 122˚ Period of Sessions, presented by the Red Nacional de Mujeres and others.

[249] Report Enforcement, Protection and Violation of Women’s Human Rights in a Country at War, Colombia 2005, report submitted to the IACHR Rapporteur during her on-site visit to Colombia by platforms, organizations and groups of women, June 2005.

[250] IACHR, Press Release, IACHR issues statement regarding the Adoption of the “Law of Justice and Peace” in Colombia. Washington, D.C., N˚ 26/05, July 15, 2005.  Among the concerns stated by the IACHR are: “The adopted bill concentrates upon the mechanisms to establish individual criminal responsibility in individual cases and involves demobilized members of illegal armed groups receiving procedural benefits.  However, its provisions fail to establish incentives for a full confession of the truth as to their responsibility in exchange for the generous judicial benefits received.  Consequently, the established mechanism does not guarantee that the crimes perpetrated will be duly clarified, and therefore in many cases the facts may not be revealed and the perpetrators will remain unpunished.  The provisions of the law might favor the concealment of other conduct that, once brought to light at a future date, could benefit from the same alternative penalties.  These procedural benefits not only reach conduct directly related to the armed conflict, but also can be invoked regarding the commission of ordinary crimes such as drug trafficking. […] In terms of the reparation of the damage caused by those responsible for the commission of heinous crimes, the law places special emphasis on the restitution of unlawfully acquired property rather than on the mechanisms that might serve the full reparation of the victims.  Particularly, it does not provide for specific mechanisms to repair the damage caused to the social fabric of the indigenous peoples, the afro-descendant communities, or the displaced women, often heads of household, who rank among the groups more vulnerable to violence by the participants in the armed conflict.  The law fails to provide as part of the reparation owed to the victims, measures directed to preventing the repetition of the crimes committed, such as disqualification or separation from official functions of state agents involved by action or omission.”

[251] Note DDH/OEA 25245/1210 of the Human Rights Direction of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Colombian Republic, 24  May  2006, p. 32.