OEA/Ser.L/V/II.34
REPORT
ON THE STATUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN CHILE Findings
of “on the spot” Observations in CHAPTER
VI INSTALLATIONS
THE COMMISSION WAS NOT ABLE TO VISIT
1.
It has already been indicated that during the visits outlined in the
preceding Chapter, Commission members were accompanied in all cases by military
authorities. It should be stated that the accompanying officials did not hinder
or disturb the Commission's work. They always stayed discretely apart while the
Commission members interrogated the prisoners, who therefore could speak more
freely.
2.
But it is also necessary to indicate a reservation of the greatest
importance, which has nothing to do with the duties performed by those
officials.
During the interrogations of prisoners, both in Santiago and outside
Santiago, in the north and in the south, of the large number who stated that
they had been subjected to torture, in some cases brutally with visible marks
remaining, most of them asserted that the torture was not applied in the
establishments where they were or had been detained, but in certain places where
they were taken for that purpose. According to what they told the Commission,
they were interrogated there, and in the interrogations, a wide range of
physical and psychological torture was employed.
3.
With significant unanimity, in widely-separated establishments, we were
told that the places used for torture were the following:
a)
A building of the Santiago Investigations Bureau, commonly known as “la
patilla”, which is on the lower floor of its local headquarters.
b)
The property at Nº 38 Londres Street, also called “The House of
Terror” or “The House of the Bells”. The latter name was due to the fact
that the bells of a nearby church can be hard inside the house. c)
The Air Force War Academy, indicated as a very important center for
physical torture.
d)
A section of the Military Hospital, in which tortures are reportedly
controlled with medical supervision.
e)
The Navy ship “Esmeralda”.
It is important to note that similar descriptions have been given of
those places by prisoners widely separated from each other.
Of course, the tortures were applied to both men and women, and they took
the most aberrant forms in the latter case.
4.
Then, when the Commission members, having completed their investigations
and still not having received the promised identification cards, expressed their
intention to visit those installations, they were told that such a visit could
not be made, because the installations had recently been declared “military
areas”.
This refusal prevented completing a task of utmost importance, namely,
comparing the descriptions, which agreed with each other, of the alleged torture
rooms, with the various locations in the buildings mentioned.
The Commission is absolutely certain that a high-level and completely
independent investigating commission designated by the Government of Chile would
not have the slightest difficulty in making the checks that the Commission
members were prevented from carrying out.
That is the only—but serious—reservation that must be made regarding
cooperation given to the Commission to enable it to perform its duties. [ Table of Contents | Next ] 1
See Emile Giraud: “Le respect des droits de l'homme dans la guerre
internationale et dans la guerre civile » in Revue de Droit Public,
t LXXIV, Nº 4, p. 613 et seq. |