|
GUATEMALA
The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has been devoting
special attention to the status of human rights in Guatemala, and has
followed very closely the events occurring in that country, which have
for a number of years reflected a situation of serious and widespread
violence, with the consequent violations of human rights for that
country’s people.
The Commission has been describing such events in its annual
reports to the General Assembly, and has also prepared three special
reports on developments in the human rights situation in Guatemala: the
first, approved on October 13, covers the period up to the government of
General Romeo Lucas García and his immediate predecessors; the second,
approved on October 5, 1983, covers the period after General Efraín Ríos
Montt assumed power (March 23, 1982 to August 8, 1983); and the third,
approved on April 9, 1986, covers the period of the government of
General Oscar Humberto Mejía Vitores (August 8, 1983 to January 16,
1986), when his administration ended and Vinicio Cerezo Arévalo became
president of the Republic.
In its third and last special report on the status of human
rights in Guatemala, the IACHR made special recommendations on the need
to investigate and punish, to the full extent of the law, those
responsible for such abominable acts as the forced disappearances of
persons, illegal executions, arbitrary arrests, torture and other crimes
against human rights.
These recommendations, while they were directed to the Government
of General Oscar Humberto Mejía Vitores, remain in force for this
current administration, because they concern the investigation and
punishment of severe violations of the essential rights of human beings
and of existing international human rights rules.
In its last report to the General Assembly, covering the period
of September 1985 through September 1986, the IACHR stressed the
progress made in human rights during the first nine months by the new
Guatemalan Government, and pointed out that from the time President
Vinicio Cerezo took office as the Guatemalan Chief of State, perceptible
changes have occurred in the human rights situation in that country,
which were reflected in a drop in political assassinations, abductions
and forced disappearances of persons, as well as raids and searches of
homes and the exodus of the indigenous and rural population, all of
which, as indicated, constituted substantial progress in the human
rights situation in that country. At the same time, the Commission
indicated that, nonetheless, disappearances continued to occur, and
other problems affecting the full observance of human rights in
Guatemala continued, resulting mainly from signs of decentralization of
the violence, which the President of the Republic appeared not to be
able to control.
Likewise, the Commission voiced concern in its last report at the
failure to investigate the forced disappearances of persons. Although
President Vinicio Cerezo had expressed his decision not to investigate
such cases directly, he had undertaken to support and back the work
conducted on this problem, as a result of the complaints to the
judiciary, particularly, the examining magistrate appointed by the
Supreme Court to investigate cases of abductions and disappearances
reported by the Mutual Support Group (GAM).
During his visit to Washington in May 1987, President Vinicio
Cerezo publicly stated on this subject that regarding the problem of
investigating the disappearances of persons before his government took
office, he had taken the political decision not to intervene in the
investigation of those abuses and that his position had always been
clear that the disappearances were a thing of the past. However, he
personally would guarantee the independence of the investigations of any
complaint submitted to the courts in his country.
During the period of this report, the Commission has received
reports on the efforts being made by President Cerezo’s government to
promote and defend human rights in Guatemala. For example, on January
30, 1987, Guatemala became the first country to deposit its instrument
of ratification to the Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish
Torture.
On March 16, Guatemala became the ninth country to accept the
compulsory jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights,
through a communication delivered on that date to the OAS General
Secretariat by the Permanent Representative of Guatemala to the OAS.
In addition, there is the important role that President Vinicio
Cerezo has been playing in the peace efforts for Central America, and
the priority that he has given, within his plan of government, to
consolidating democracy and representative institutions in Guatemala.
In addition, the difficulties that originally had been
encountered and that had caused President Cerezo to veto and return to
Congress the bill establishing the post of human rights prosecutor,
because he considered that the bill gave that official too much power,
were overcome. After the bill was passed, on August 17, 1987, the
distinguished jurist Gonzalo Menéndez de la Riva was appointed as the
first human rights prosecutor in Guatemala, and on August 19, he took
the oath of office before the Congress of the Republic.
However, during the period of this report, the Commission has
observed that, despite all of President Vinicio Cerezo’s declared good
intentions to maintain control of the human rights situation, a
perceptible decline in the observance of human rights occurred
immediately after the first months of his government.
No serious effort has been made by the responsible agencies to
carry out the Commission’s recommendation to investigate the cases of
forced disappearances of persons. This has caused the families of such
persons, who have joined together in the Mutual Support Group (GAM), to
protest continuously through many public demonstrations to exert
pressure and arouse public opinion domestically and internationally on
the need to investigate the crimes committed against hundreds of
persons, which are attributed to paramilitary groups and to the
Guatemalan armed forces themselves in their antisubversive struggle.
The activities of the GAM will be discussed further below, but at
this point the IACHR wishes to express its discouragement at this lack
of investigation that has led to the failure to punish those responsible
for answering for such acts, and that the families of the victims felt
was designed to cover with a mantle of impunity the persons responsible
for planning and carrying out the murder of many Guatemalan citizens.
The fact that disappearances of persons has started again in the
period of this report is a cause of deep concern for the IACHR. The
Commission has reports that from the time the present government took
office to date, after an initial period of relative calm, distressing
cases of the disappearance of Guatemalan citizens have begun to occur
again. It has not been possible to determine the reasons for their
detention or abduction, nor to obtain any information about their
whereabouts, despite the fact that, in most cases, there is evidence
that the Guatemalan security forces are responsible for these
disappearances.
In addition, the Commission has been informed that almost all of
the investigations by the families of the disappeared persons and their
efforts to obtain information from the police and administrative
authorities about the whereabouts of their loved ones, during the period
of this report, have produced no results whatever. Nor have any positive
results been obtained from judicial proceedings initiated by the
families of disappeared persons before the agencies having jurisdiction
over such matters, which in most cases have ruled as without
justification writs for amparo and habeas corpus filed in
the hope of obtaining an investigation by the judiciary of the forced
disappearances of persons. This exhausts all of the valid domestic legal
remedies available.
During the period of this report, the IACHR has opened 90 cases
of complaints involving 117 victims of alleged human rights violations
against the Republic of Guatemala. These involve violations of the right
to life and in almost all of them disappearance of the persons involved,
who had been previously abducted. The families of the victims in these
cases have filed writs of habeas corpus, which have been
dismissed by the Guatemalan judiciary.
In addition to the seriousness of the human rights situations in
these cases, the IACHR is concerned that they involve a serious setback
in the progress made at the beginning of President Cerezo’s
administration, the resumption of methods and systems for eliminating
persons in mass, and the reappearance of the dreadful death squads. In
addition, the Government has displayed an apparent willingness to
cooperate with the Commission in determining the facts of these new
cases, with regard to which, the IACHR, because its requests have been
disregarded, has had to again request information and reiterate its
recommendations that these cases be investigated.
By a decision made by the IACHR at its 69th session in
September 1986, the Guatemalan Government was asked to allow a member of
the IACHR, accompanied by staff of its Secretariat, to make a short
visit to that country to interview the President of the Republic and
other officials of the Guatemalan Government, in order to discuss the
human rights situation in that country and to learn about the
investigations of recent cases of disappeared persons, whose increase,
as stated, seriously concerns the Commission. The Commission trusts that
that visit will take place during 1987.
Regarding the right to a fair trial and due process, the
Commission had stressed in its previous report the judiciary
reorganization ordered by the new government of President Cerezo to
restore the judiciary’s credibility, independence and autonomy. In
addition, the report highlighted the establishment of a new Central
Control Registry of Prisoners, which was intended to serve as an organ
of consultation for any person wishing information about the status of
any family member being detained. Unfortunately, the IACHR must now
criticize the ineffective way the judiciary has participated in the
investigation of the new cases of the forced disappearance of persons
and the fact that the Central Control Registry of Prisoners has been of
little use in resolving this kind of problem, despite the hopes that the
Commission—which had recommended it—had placed in this registry.
In this connection, the Commission must again mention the problem
of the ineffectiveness of habeas corpus remedies or orders to
bring the accused before the court (exhibición personal), which, in the
past, have become inoperative, as a guarantee of legal protection
against illegal detentions, abductions and disappearances, to protect
the right to liberty, security, humane treatment and the right to life.
The inoperativeness of the habeas corpus remedy has been
shown during the period of this report by the many habeas corpus
writs filed that have been dismissed by the judiciary solely on the
basis of police reports that the persons detained or disappeared were
not being held at any of the country’s detention centers, and in other
cases, on the basis of a mere visit by the judge with whom the habeas
corpus writ was filed, to inspect the record books showing entries
of persons into some of the prisons or detention centers in the
Republic, thereby frustrating the hopes and efforts of the victims’
families.
The Commission once again reiterates its recommendations in
previous reports that it is essential to re-establish the legal
guarantees that make it possible to check abuses of power by the
security forces, so that existing legal measures to defend human rights
can be really effective in practice.
Regarding the rights to personal liberty and humane treatment,
the Commission has received during the period of this report persistent
reports of illegal detention and mistreatment of prisoners. Some of
these cases have turned into forced disappearances of persons, as
reviewed in the portion of this report dealing with the ineffectiveness
of habeas corpus remedies. In this connection, the Commission is
particularly concerned at the status of a number of Guatemalan union
leaders, an area that has been given special consideration by the
Commission. Some of these leaders have been arrested, some mistreated
and others have even been murdered.
Regarding the activities of the Mutual Support Group, the
Commission regrets the continuous confrontations that group has had with
security forces and with the head of state himself in demanding
investigations of the disappearance of their family members. During the
sixteenth session of the OAS General Assembly in November 1986 in
Guatemala City, the Mutual Support Group demonstrated before the meeting
place of the diplomatic representatives of the OAS member countries in
order to voice their protest at the lack of investigation of the cases
of forced disappearances of their family members. The demonstration took
place in front of the National Theatre where the OAS General Assembly
meeting was held, at a time when President Cerezo and 31 delegates and
foreign ministers of the countries of the Americas were attending. The
demonstrators demanded that the members of the Assembly intercede with
President Vinicio Cerezo to urge him to set up a committee to
investigate the disappearances. At that time, the then Chairman of the
IACHR, Dr. Luis Adolfo Siles Salinas, met with the leaders of the group
and offered to urge, as in fact he did, the President of Guatemala to
comply with the recommendations in the Commission’s report to the
General Assembly, that investigations be made of those responsible for
illegal executions, disappearances, arbitrary arrests and torture in the
country, and that they be punished to the full extent of the law.
Later, President Vinicio Cerezo met with the disappeared
persons’ family members who are members of the Mutual Support Group.
The meeting took place at the Central Plaza next to the National Palace
on April 7 of this year. President Cerezo formally announced the
establishment of a Government commission to investigate the whereabouts
of disappeared persons. Members of the Commission would be the
following: a representative of the President of the Republic; a
representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; a representative of
the Ministry of the Interior; a representative of the Human Rights
Commission and a representative of the Congress of the Republic.
The Commission was charged with the following duties: report
within three months about the whereabouts of the persons clamed to have
disappeared; communicate the results of the investigations to each of
the persons interested in getting information about the situation of
their family members; and suggest alternatives to resolve the social and
economic problems of the families of disappeared persons. Since the
Commission designated by President Cerezo did not include nongovernment
sectors, this caused the GAM to demand that some individual persons and
institutions participate, in order—as they said—to make the
Commission multisectoral. It should be noted that the deadline
originally set for the Commission has been considerably exceeded and
that the findings of its investigations are still not known.
On June 30, 1987, on the occasion of the yearly celebration of
Army Day, the GAM announced that it would demonstrate publicly in large
numbers. The Guatemalan Army called that announcement a new provocation
by the GAM, and recalled that on September 15, 1986, during a parade of
the Guatemalan Army, GAM members headed by Mrs. Nineth de García,
heckled the marching columns and joined the end of the parade carrying
placards and shouting slogans. To prevent a similar disturbance, the
Army posted a column of troops firing tear gas to break up the GAM
demonstration.
On July 16, GAM marchers peacefully occupied the National
Congress by surprise and demanded that President Vinicio Cerezo keep his
promise to order that the Commission to Investigate Disappeared Persons
set up last April start to work; that the GAM be received by the
President of the Republic; and that persecution of GAM members cease.
They also voiced their frustration at what they termed the indifference
of the authorities to their demand that the Investigating Commission
proposed by President Cerezo be set up, and they also declared that they
considered themselves to be deceived and flouted by what they called the
false promises of the chief of state. Twenty-four hours later, the GAM
vacated the National Congress, after the President of the Congress and
the Human Rights Commission of the Parliament delivered a letter to the
GAM leaders guaranteeing that they would be received by President Cerezo
to resolve all aspects of the issue of the Investigating Commission.
To attend the audience granted by President Vinicio Cerezo, which
had been scheduled for Thursday, July 23 at 4:00 p.m., over 200 members
of the Mutual Support Group went to the National Palace where they found
that an anti-riot squad of national police had surrounded the Palace
since early in the morning. When the GAM leaders tried to enter the
Palace for the interview, they were informed by an official that they
would not be received by the President. At 3:00 p.m., a half hour before
the interview, the GAM members were told that the President had left and
that they had orders to clear the area. When the GAM refused to leave,
the police forces, according to reports, proceeded to disperse them
brutally with their night sticks, so that a number of GAM members—men,
women and children—were so severely beaten that they had to receive
medical care. As a reaction to that attack, the GAM members shortly
after 4:00 p.m. took refuge in the Metropolitan Cathedral of Guatemala,
where the President of the Congress arrived to reiterate his desire to
serve as intermediary with the President. On the following day, a press
release from the President of the Republic reported that the GAM would
be received. President Cerezo did receive them on July 30 at 12:00 noon,
stating that the previous meeting had not been held because allegedly
the GAM did not show up at the scheduled time.
The Commission much regrets the above events and recommends that
a careful investigation be made to determine whether there is a
connection between these events, and also recommends that full
guarantees be given for labor union activities, in order to avoid the
situation become even worse, as happened with previous governments.
In summary, the Commission notes that, despite the efforts of
President Cerezo’s government to consolidate the state of law and
democratic institutions, serious restrictions and obstacles still
persist in Guatemala regarding the observance of fundamental human
rights. This situation results primarily from decentralizing the
violence that has for many years characterized this country, the
preponderant role still played by the armed forces, which are not
subject to effective government control, and the judiciary’s lack of
effectiveness, despite some progress made, in serving as an instrument
capable of promptly correcting human rights violations. [ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ] |