|
RESOLUTION Nš 28/86 CASE
9190 JAMAICA April
16, 1986 BACKGROUND:
1. On June 17, 1983, Mr. Wesley Cuthbert a Jamaican citizen acting on his own behalf submitted a communication to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in which he stated that on June 11, 1978, he was arrested by the police on suspicion of having murdered his wife Claudette, his two and a half years old son Dale and his wife's seven years old nephew Christopher Jackson, on the same date in the parish of Saint Andrew a crime of which he claimed having absolutely no knowledge. On May 21, 1979, he was tried in the Home Circuit Court of Kingston, Jamaica, convicted and sentenced to death on June 7, 1979. He also informed the Commission that he lost his appeal against his convictions and sentences on July 31, 1981. Mr Cuthbert complains of unfair trial and miscarriage of justice. 2. Aware of the
possible difficulties that the complainant may encounter to satisfy the
requirements of the Regulations; because Mr. Cuthbert allegedly did not
enjoy the benefit of a fair trial, complaining of irregularities in the
police investigation, and also in the court trial which led to his death
sentence. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, in accordance
with Article 48 of the Regulations, requested by Note of October 3,1983,
that the Government of Jamaica supply the transcripts of the trials of
Wesley Cuthbert in the Criminal Court and also those of the Court of
Appeals as well as any information to verify not only the legal
foundation and justification of the allegations formulated in the
complaint but also to determine whether the internal legal procedures
and remedies of the country have been duly applied and exhausted. The
plaintiff was advised of this request by letter of the same date. 3. The Government
of Jamaica by Note Nš 6/80/1 of March 6, 1984, replied to the
Commission's request and furnished a four-volume copy of transcripts of
the Circuit Court of Kingston; the Reasons for Judgement of the Court of
Appeals-Supreme Court Criminal Appeal Nš 114/79 and copy of two
statements made to the police by the plaintiff on June 12, 1978. 4. By Note of
March 19, 1984, the Commission acknowledged receipt of these documents
to the Government of Jamaica and advised the plaintiff of this
submission. WHEREAS:
1. The information
and documentation submitted to the Commission indicate that all domestic
legal remedies have been exhausted and none of the conditions of
inadmissibility established in the American Convention on Human Rights
were present, therefore, this case is admissible; 2. The case of
Wesley Cuthbert was reviewed by the Court of Appeals on June 2-5, July
31, and September 21, 1981; 3. A study of the
transcripts of the Home Circuit Court and the Court of Appeals as well
as the conduct of the trial of Wesley Cuthbert and review of his case
show that the rules of criminal procedure were observed and that the
plaintiff received a fair trial; 4. During his
trials, Wesley Cuthbert was assisted by defense counsel; 5. The documents
submitted to the Commission show that the requirements of due process
have been fulfilled; 6. The Commission
by Note of June 7,1984, renewed its request that the Government of
Jamaica in accordance with the spirit of Article 4 (3) of the American
Convention on Human Rights as well as for humanitarian reasons consider
the commutation of the death sentence and take definite appropriate
steps to abolish the death penalty as has been done in various
countries. THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. To declare that
there exists no evidence of the alleged violations of the American
Convention on Human Rights as claimed by the plaintiff; 2. To communicate
this Resolution to the Government of Jamaica and to the plaintiff; and 3. To recommend
that the Government of Jamaica suspend the execution of those persons
sentenced to death, commute the sentence of Wesley Cuthbert and consider
the abolition on the death penalty. |