|
RESOLUTION Nš 24/86 CASE
8097 HONDURAS April
18, 1986 HAVING
SEEN: 1. Resolution Nš
32/83, approved by the Commission at its 61st Session (October 1983),
whereby, pursuant to the provisions of Article 42 (formerly Article 39)
of its Regulations, it decided to presume to be true the facts that are
the subject matter of this case, consisting in the arrest and
disappearance of Professor SAUL GODINEZ CRUZ on July 22, 1982, in
Choluteca, Honduras; it recommended to the Government of Honduras that
it adopt the pertinent measures on the situation examined, i.e.: a) that
it order a complete and impartial investigation to determine the persons
responsible for the facts reported; b) that it punish the persons
responsible for those events; and c) that it inform the Commission of
the measures taken to implement those recommendations, which was
communicated to the Government of Honduras in its note of October 11,
1983. 2. That in its
note of December 1, 1983 (Official Letter Nš 1543) the Government of
Honduras submitted observations on Resolution 32/83 requesting its
reconsideration since an investigation by a (special) Investigating
Commission was under way for the purpose of clarifying the complaints
about alleged violations of human rights, establishing responsibilities
for the events and punishing the persons responsible therefor, and
offering to send to the Commission the reports on the results of the
work of that Special Investigating Commission. 3. That the
Government of Honduras has not provided the information offered on the
results of the work of the Special Investigating Commission or that
which the IACHR requested it to provide in order enable it to continue
studying the case. 4. That,
therefore, the request for reconsideration of Resolution 32/83 is
unfounded and lacks information other than that already examined by the
Commission that could warrant reconsideration of the decision adopted at
the 61st session. 5. That the
Government of Honduras has not implemented the recommendations of the
Commission. CONSIDERING:
1. That from the
information presented in this case, both by the above-mentioned
government and by the petitioner, it is inferred that neither the person
whose rights allegedly have been violated nor the persons petitioning in
his name and on his behalf have not had access to the remedies of the
domestic law of Honduras or were prevented from exhausting them. 2. That in the
case that is the subject matter of this resolution, the Commission has
not been able, by reason of the nature of the complaint, to apply the
friendly settlement procedure provided for in Article 48, paragraph 1, f,
of the American Convention on Human Rights and in Article 45 of its
Regulations. 3. That, since the
friendly settlement procedure is not applicable, the Commission pursuant
to the provisions of Article 51, paragraph 1, of the Convention, gives
its opinion and conclusions on the issue submitted to it for
consideration. 4. That the
Commission, at its 67th session (April 1986), pursuant to the provisions
of Article 51, paragraph 1 of the Convention and paragraph 3 of that
article and, in addition, since all the periods set for the
above-mentioned government to implement the recommendations contained in
Resolution 32/83 have expired, has decided that the State of Honduras
has not taken appropriate measures for remedying the situation examined.
5. That, in
addition, since the friendly settlement procedure is not applicable to
the case that is the subject matter of this resolution, the Commission
may, pursuant to Article 50 of its Regulations, submit the case to the
Inter-American Courts of Human Rights, if the government has not
implemented the recommendations made; and 6. That on
September 9, 1981, the Government of Honduras declared its recognition
of the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in
accordance with Article 62 of the Convention. THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. To publish in
all its parts, Resolution 32/83 as well as the text of this Resolution
pursuant to Article 63 g) of the Commission's Regulations. 2. To refer the
case to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights for the purposes
provided for in Article 63, paragraph 1, of the Convention and therefore
that the Court may decide that there has been a violation of the rights
to life (Article 1), to humane treatment (Article 5) and personal
liberty (Article 7) of the American Convention on Human Rights; that the
consequences of the situation that has constituted the violation of
those rights should be repaired and that fair compensation be should be
granted to the injured party or parties. 3. To transmit
this Resolution to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, to the
petitioner, and to the Government of Honduras, in accordance with the
provisions of Article 50, paragraph 1, of the Regulations of the
Commission.
|