|
RESOLUTION Nº 16/84
CASE
7951 HONDURAS October 4, 1984 BACKGROUND: 1. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights received the following denunciation in a communication dated January 14, 1982: Francisco
Fairen Garbi, passport 9-048-377, student, 28 years of age, and Yolanda
Solís Corrales, passport 1-419-1217, educator, 28 years of age,
disappeared in Honduras on December 11, 1981, while passing through that
country on their way to Mexico. The
Honduran authorities deny that they entered Honduras, whereas reports
from the Government of Nicaragua attest to their departure from that
country into Honduras through the "Las Manos" border post at
4:00 p.m. on December 11, 1081. We
ask the Honduran Government to respect their lives and personal safety,
for there is concern that they may be suffering ill-treatment, and to
inform the Government of Costa Rica as to their whereabouts and
circumstances, expediting their return to Costa Rica. 2. In a note dated
January 19, 1982, the Commission transmitted the relevant parts of this
denunciation to the Government of Honduras, requesting information on
the events reported, as well as any facts that would enable the
Commission to determine whether or not domestic legal remedies has been
exhausted in this case. 3. In a note dated
January 21, 1982, the Commission received additional information on this
case, which was transmitted to the Government of Honduras on February
22, 1982, in the following terms: We
denounce human rights violations by the Honduran Government to the
detriment of the following persons: Francisco Fairen Garbi,
bearer of Costa Rican passport Nº 9048377, 28 years of age, single, a
student of Economics at the University of Costa Rica and employee of the
National Bank of Costa Rica since 1974, whose address in Costa Rica is
Calle 1, Avenidas 8 y 10, Escazú
Centro, telephone 28-05-26. and Miss Yolanda Solís Corrales,
bearer of Costa Rican passport Nº; 14191217, 28 years of age, single,
professor of Social Science, whose address in Costa Rica is Calle 5,
Avenidas 12 y 14, EscazÜ, Telephone: 28-21-23. Our denunciation is
based on the following facts: On
December 8, 1981, the persons described above left San José in a 1971
Opel-Record automobile, Costa Rican license plates Nº 39992, on their
way to Mexico via Nicaragua, Honduras and Guatemala, their final
destination being the city of Córdova, State of Veracruz, Mexico. They
were to return to Costa Rica on December 21st, as Francisco had to go
back to work on December 22nd. Furthermore, both parties had promised
their families that they would be home for the Christmas celebrations. When
they had not returned by December 24, enquiries were made among their
friends and acquaintances, but none of whom had any news to give. At the
home of the relatives they had gone to visit in Mexico the report was
that they had never arrived. In view of this, notes were dispatched on
January 5, 1982 to the Embassies of Nicaragua, Honduras and Guatemala,
requesting information on the whereabouts of these two persons. On
January 8, 1982, a reply was received from the Embassy of Nicaragua in
Costa Rica, certifying that both Francisco and Yolanda had left
Nicaraguan territory on December 11, 1981, through the "Las
Manos" frontier post which borders with Honduras. On January 24,
1982, the Embassy of Guatemala reported that neither Francisco nor
Yolanda had entered Guatemala between December 8 and 12, 1981. In view
of the fact that no reply was received from the Embassy of Honduras, a
visit was made to Mrs. Argentina de Sanchez, Third Secretary in charge
of the Embassy during the Ambassador's absence on vacation; this lady
explained that she was not authorized to communicate with her own
country's Foreign Office while the Ambassador was away. The sole reply
received came in the form of a telegram dated January 20, 1982, which
read as follows: SIRS: AWARE OF YOUR DEEP CONCERN WE AWAIT REPLY FROM
HONDURAN AUTHORITIES IN ORDER TO TRANSMIT SAME TO YOU. Starting on
January 4, 1982, negotiations were initiated with the Second
Vice-President of the Republic and Minister of Economy, Industry and
Trade, Lic. José Miguel Alfaro; the Minister of the Presidency, Lic.
José Rafael Cordero Croceri; the Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs and
Worship, Lic. Mario Fernández Silva, and the following Foreign Office
officials: Director General of the Foreign Service, Mrs. Francis Víquez
de Solórzono. Director General for Protocol, Lic. José Luis Cordero
Cooper; Head of the Department of Immunity and Privileges, Lic. José
Andrés Carrillo Chávez; Head of the Consular Department, Mr. Víctor
Monge. A letter was also send to Lic. Bernd Nihaus, Minister of Foreign
Affairs and Worship of Costa Rica. Mr. Víctor Monge, Head of the
Consular Department, reported that this was the fifth case of
disappearance of Costa Ricans in Honduras that the Foreign Office was
aware of. Upon contacting the Costa Rican Consulate in Honduras and
after that Consulate had requested information from the DNI (National
Investigation Department), he reported that migration records at the
border posts did not show Francisco and Yolanda as having entered and
that they were, therefore, not in Honduras; however, the official report
for the month of December had not been examined. The
Costa Rican Consul in Honduras subsequently received copies of the
computer print-outs of entries through the three border posts between
Honduras and Nicaragua from December 8 to 15, none of which recorded the
entry of Francisco and Yolanda. This report was received three days
after it was requested and not on the same day, as is customary. At no
point did Mr. Víctor Monge or the Costa Rican Consulate in Honduras
receive an official reply. Vice-President
Alfaro, who was in Honduras between January 11 and 13, asked his
counterpart in Honduras for information. The latter agreed that he would
request the Director of the G-2 for information, but no reply has been
received to date. The
Minister of the Presidency, Lic. Cordero Croceri, reported that the case
had been taken up at a meeting of the Cabinet on Thursday, January 7, at
which all the Ministers expressed their concern about the situation, and
that he personally would approach the Honduran Government. The Minister
of Justice, Lic. Elizabeth Odio, asked for information and received a
verbal reply to the effect that they had not entered Honduras; such
verbal reply does not constitute an official communication. Vice-President
Lic. Fernández Silva contacted the Costa Rican Ambassador in Honduras,
Lic. Federico Alvarez, who promised to make enquiries into the case but
was unable to obtain any positive results. He also promised help and
official protection to one of the relatives of the victims should he
eventually travel to Honduras. In
light of the Government of Honduras' reluctance to issue immediate
official reports, the report of the Government of Nicaragua indicating
that the subjects had left that country, and the testimony of
Tegucigalpa residents who assert that between 18:00 and 18:30 hours on
December 11 they observed an Opel vehicle with Costa Rican plates in the
vicinity of the Alameda Hotel, with a young couple inside it (and there
are repeated reports of these sightings), we hold the Honduran
Government and the G-2 responsible for the disappearance of the victims.
As
is well known, there have been other cases of physical abuse and we fear
that this might be repeated. We therefore ask that their lives and
physical and moral safety be respected. 4. In a note dated
January 17, 1982, the Government of Honduras answered the Commission's
requests for information by indicating that "we are awaiting a
reply from the Honduran authorities, which we shall transmit to
you." 5. On March 8,
1982, the Government of Honduras sent the following reply to the
Commission's request for information: As
a result of investigations carried out by the competent authorities in
connection with the supposed disappearance of Costa Rican nationals
Francisco Fairen Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales, I wish to report
the following: 1.
Due to the great interest expressed by the High Command of our
Armed Forces and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in locating or throwing
light on the whereabouts or transit route through our country of the
subjects, it has been possible to establish the following: That
FRANCISCO FAIREN GARBI, of Costa Rican nationality, passport Nº
904837781, and YOLANDA SOLIS CORRALES, of Costa Rican nationality,
passport Nº, 1419-1217, entered Honduran territory through the
"Las Manos" customs, Department of El Paraíso, on December
11, 1981, driving on Opel vehicle with Costa Rican plates Nº 39991. 1.2
They left the country at 15:00 hours on December 12, 1981,
through the "El Florido" Customs Post, Department of Copán
(Western border), supposedly en route to the Republic of Guatemala. 2.
The above information was obtained from the "Las Manos"
and "El Florido" Customs Posts, respectively. I
would, furthermore, transcribe below the report drawn up by the Head of
Migration Inspector, Mr. Alejandro Pérez Molina, which literally states
the following: "February
24, 1982 - Director General of Population and P.M. Infantry Colonel
DAGOBERTO GOMEZ SUAZO. Sir: I wish to report on the investigation
conducted on the entry and exit of Messrs. FRANCISCO FAIREN GARBI AND
YOLANDA SOLIS CORRALES, both of Costa Rican nationality, who entered the
country through the Migration Post of Las Manos, El Paraíso, where they
presented themselves on December 11, 1981, at approximately 4:30 p.m.,
at which hour our Post is already closed for the day in view of the fact
that our counterpart in Nicaragua closes its borders to the public at
4:00 p.m. The abovementioned subjects were therefore allowed to pass on
December 12, 1981. On that same day they exited through the Migration
Post of El Florido, Copán, on their way to Guatemala. To this effect, I
attach the migration vouchers issued, showing completed cycles. Hoping
this report is received in good order, respectfully, Seal and Signature
ALEJANDRO PEREZ MOLINA, Head of Migration Inspection Office. In
a note dated May 12, 1982, the Commission transmitted to the Government
of Honduras the observations of the claimant contained in letters dated
March 15 and April 6, 1982, requesting a reply. The observations were as
follows: The
sudden appearance of my son, Francisco Fairen Garbi, and his travel
companion on Honduran territory and their meteoric passage to the
Republic of Guatemala on December 12, 1981, is not easily believed,
unless one is possessed of an unbelievable degree of naïvete. The
erratic declarations of the Plenipotentiary Ambassador of Honduras to
this country, Mrs. Albertine Bernhard de Zelaya, regarding the presence
or non-presence of my son and his companion in her country and the
overdue, conflicting statements and certifications of the Honduran
authorities on the subject constitute, in our opinion, an abuse of
truth. An abuse that can be proved. On
January 8, 1982, the Consulate of Nicaragua in San José issued, at our
request, a certificate attesting to the fact that Francisco and Yolanda
had left that country in route for Honduras on December 11, 1982,
through the "Las Manos" border post. On February 5, 1982, the
Nicaraguan authorities completed the foregoing information by sending us
photostatic copies of the "embarkation-debarkation" cards
filled out by our relatives, now missing, in their own handwriting. The
cards indicate 4:00 p.m. to be the hour of their departure towards
Honduran territory. On
January 14, 1982, the Consul of Guatemala in San José issued a
certificate based on a report from the Guatemala authorities, to the
effect that: "between December 8 and 12, 1981, the persons in
question DID NOT ENTER OR LEAVE GUATEMALA." Under
pressure from our demands to the Government of Honduras, made public
through various communications media, the Ambassador of that country in
Costa Rica took out an ad in the La Nación newspaper to make the
following statement: "in connection with the denunciations made
regarding the disappearance of Francisco Fairen Garbi and Yoland Solís
Corrales"... "the Honduran officials of the National
Investigations Department have been consulted and have confirmed, after
conducting an exhaustive investigation at the a) Las Manos, b) El Espino
and c) Guasaule border posts on the frontier with the Republic of
Nicaragua, that the abovementioned Costa Rican citizens AT NO TIME
ENTERED the territory of the Republic of Honduras." Please note
that the Plenipotentiary Ambassador of Honduras to Costa Rica uses the
word EXHAUSTIVE to transmit to the readers the description that the
investigative authorities themselves give of the search conducted in
their files. This certification is dated January 24, 1982. On
February 11, 1982, however, the Secretary General for Population and
Migration Policies of Honduras issues a certificate reading as follows:
"The Department of Statistics reports that the following migratory
entry appears in the files kept for this purpose in the name of Yolanda
Solís Corrales, of Costa Rican nationality, who entered the country on
December 12, 1981, through the customs post of Las Manos in a private
vehicle from the direction of Nicaragua. We certify that OUR FILES DO
NOT SHOW MR. FRANCISCO FAIREN AND HAVING ENTERED OUR COUNTRY, NOR IS
THERE A RECORD OF THE DEPARTURE OF BOTH COSTA RICAN CITIZENS." This
certificate aroused our special interest, due to the fact that the only
passengers in the "private vehicle" referred to were my son
and Yolanda, and we knew from her relatives and friends that Yolanda did
not know how to drive. This fact was confirmed by the Motor Vehicle
Office in a certification given in San José at 14 hours on February 22,
1982. Nevertheless, on February 19, 1982, the Plenipotentiary Minister
of the Republic of Honduras, Mrs. Albertina Bernhard de Zelaya, asserts
as a result of a new denunciation on my part stating that "they had
been seen in the center of the city of Tegucigalpa..." that
"the Minister of Foreign Affairs of my country has intensified the
investigations into this case...after the COMPETENT AUTHORITIES of my
country reported, through me, that THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF THE
YOUNGSTERS IN QUESTION HAVING ENTERED HONDURAS..." Surprisingly,
this letter which, as has been stated, was sent to me on February 19,
1982, completely ignores the amazing averment dated February 4 which was
issued by one of those COMPETENT AUTHORITIES mentioned by the
Plenipotentiary Ambassador. On
February 26, 1982, I received from Mr. Carlos López Santuzo, in the
Guatemalan Consulate in San José, copy of a certificate dated February
3, 1982, to the effect that both my son Francisco and his companion
Yolanda had entered Guatemala from Honduras on December 12, 1981,
through the "El Florido" border post, subsequently passing to
El Salvador on December 14, 1981, through the post at Valle Nuevo. On
March 10, 1982, our Foreign Office received a hurried note from Mr.
Edgardo Paz Barnica, evidently based on the second certification issued
by the Government of Guatemala, which, perhaps in the interests of
keeping up appearances, was prudently predated. Mr. Paz Barnica says
something that is very much in keeping with the surprising context
surrounding our case. Ninety days after the disappearance of our
children and after numerous EXHAUSTIVE INVESTIGATIONS BY THE COMPETENT
AUTHORITIES, it is now asserted that Francisco and Yolanda entered and
left Honduras on December 11, a circumstance that in Mr. Paz Barnica's
opinion closes the case for the greater glory and benefit of Honduras. But
is it logical and prudent to accept the facts as they try to present
them to us, without analyzing them in any way? Which of all the
certificates, reports and statements listed actually states the truth?
The Nicaraguan certificates are beyond suspicion. Those from Guatemala
smack of a fabrication. As for the Honduran reports, we believe that not
one of them is in line with the others, rather, they all contradict each
other, although the last one curiously coincides with the second report
of the Guatemalans. This leads me to the conviction that the Government
of Honduras is in fact in no position to throw light on the facts as
requested. And this is true not only of the case involving Francisco and
Yolanda, but also of the numerous disappearances of Costa Rican and
other nationals that have occurred in Honduras. The Government of
Honduras must, therefore, step aside and allow the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights and Amnesty International to be the ones to
carry out the investigation it has proved unable to perform. Another
aspect that is a source of concern to us is the Honduran Government's
unwillingness to allow a second autopsy to be performed on the body of a
young man found in an area known as "La Montañita", some 20
Kms. away from the City of Tegucigalpa, and buried in the General
Cemetery of that city. The body of that young man was found, barefoot
and beltless--you will understand the significance normally attached to
these circumstances--on December 28, 1981, with three bullets in the
neck. The physical traits visible in the forensic photograph indicate
that it could be the body of my son Francisco. Our Foreign Office
transmitted to its counterpart in Honduras our petition for a new
autopsy, emphasizing our interest in receiving the dental data obtained
from the corpse, since we have in our possession the necessary
information to enable us to verify his identity in that way. To date,
the Honduran Government has not broken its silence. Does that attitude
reflect forgetfulness or an innocent confusion on the part of the
Honduran authorities? Would that those authorities were as ingenuous as
they wish to appear. Maybe then our relatives would appear. 7. In a
communication dated June 9, 1982, the Government of Honduras replied as
follows: I
reaffirm the contents of Communication Nº 153 DSM, dated May 8 this
year, through which we informed that Honorable Commission of the results
of the investigations into the supposed disappearance of Costa Rican
citizens Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales, which
report was accompanied by the corresponding migration vouchers and the
car's entry permit. A
transcript was also provided of the communiqué issued by the Department
of Population and Migration Policy, clarifying all the particulars of
the migratory cycle made by the persons in question. The
position adopted by the claimant is, therefore, incongruous. He refuses
to accept the evidence presented not only by us, but also by the
Government of Guatemala, which issued a certificate attesting that the
subjects entered Guatemalan territory and left it through the border
post of Valle Nuevo on December 14, 1981, bound for the Republic of El
Salvador (see page 3 of the document titled "Observations of the
claimant" which is attached to your communication.) The only proof
offered by the claimant is that the abovementioned
certifications--specifically the one issued by Guatemala,--"smack
of fabrication". We
do not wish to go into greater detail on this aspect, since my
Government cannot assume the role of defense counsel of its Guatemalan
counterpart. Nevertheless, we do wish to draw attention to the type of
proof he offers. Furthermore, we would point out that the claimant is
only ready to accept the certifications given by the Government of
Nicaragua, which he finds are "beyond suspicion". We
cannot but ask ourselves: Why does he accept only these proofs? Why does
he find that only these are beyond suspicion? It is not for my
Government to respond to those questions; indeed, we respect the
certification in question, as we also respect the one issued by the
Consulate of Guatemala, since both States are sovereign entities with
all that that condition implies. On the other hand, as regards the
exhumation of the corpse that he requests, I must inform you that in my
country everybody has the right to come before the courts of law in
order to demand his rights. Since the claimant is not a Honduran
national, he must comply with the provisions of the international
treaties governing such matters. We cannot interfere with the workings
of the law for by so doing we would be violating the rule of law and,
consequently, judicial authority. All the steps of the corresponding
legal procedure must be followed in this case in order to guarantee the
validity of his rights. Lastly,
I wish to call your attention to the disrespectful comments made by the
claimant, which are an affront to the dignity of my State and my
Government. I am extremely surprised that the Executive Secretariat
should have accept such comments in the manner presented, since under
Article 39 paragraph a) the Commission shall not accept any
communication deemed inadmissible because it is written in disrespectful
or offensive language, and what could be more offensive than the
language used by the claimant when he asserts that "the Government
of Honduras is in fact in no position to throw light on the facts as
requested", "the Government of Honduras must, therefore, step
aside..." and the bragging tone of his statement about Mr. Paz
Barnica's closing of the case, for the greater glory and benefit of
Honduras; the above simply to give but a few examples. 8. In a note dated
November 30, 1982, the claimant responded to the new communication from
the Honduran Government in the following terms: I
confess that, to date, I am unaware of the findings of the
investigations conducted by the Honduran authorities into the
"disappearance" of the abovementioned persons. However, I
believe that the information gathered by the authorities is already in
the hands of that Honorable Commission. This cannot but please me,
particularly considering that it includes the corresponding
"migration vouchers" as well as the entry permit for the car
which the travellers were driving. This is precisely the type of
documentation that we, in vain, awaited in Costa Rica from the Honduran
authorities. Nevertheless, having learned our lesson from the type of
statements and documents that the Honduran Government has been want to
provide, it would be prudent for the Commission to find a way to let us
see and examine them in order to establish whether they are of any value
whatsoever, lest they turn out to be like the previous documents which,
as we know, were fabricated by those same "competent"
authorities, confusedly rushing to hide facts that threaten the Honduran
regime. My
position vis-a-vis the Honduran Government in this case is based on my
past and present interpretation of the incongruities of its authorities.
If they have contradicted themselves in each and every one of the
statements made and each and every one of the "certifications"
issued, the fault has not been ours. I
have invented nothing. And although it has been stated before, there is
no harm in repeating the following: a) The
youngsters Francisco Fairén Harbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales left San
José, Costa Rica, on December 8, 1981, as I have already stated, on a
journey to Mexico. They should have returned to their homes on December
22. However, since they had still not returned by the first days of the
new year, we started making enquiries to learn their whereabouts on
January 5, approaching the diplomatic representations of the countries
through which the route chosen by the travellers would take them, in
order to seek information about them. b)
Three hours after our visit to the Embassy of Nicaragua we
received our first report by telephone: the travellers had crossed the
Nicaraguan frontier into Honduras in the afternoon of December 11, 1981,
through the border post at Las Manos. The Consul General of Nicaragua
issued a certificate ratifying this first report on January 8, 1982. A
few days later, we were handed copies of the
"embarkation-debarkation" cards that had been filled out by
the travellers upon crossing the borders. That was the total
participation of the Nicaraguan authorities in this case. c)
On the 14th day of January, 1982, the First Secretary and Consul,
at that time acting Chargé d'Affairs of the Government of Guatemala to
the Government of the Republic of Costa Rica, handed us a statement
certifying that the authorities of the Department of Migration of
Guatemala had no record of passage by the youngsters on Guatemalan soil
between December 8 and 12. d)
On January 21, 1982, the Embassy of the Republic of Honduras in
Costa Rica declared in a paid ad that appeared in the newspapers that,
according to the National Investigations Department (DNI), "after
conducting an exhaustive investigation..." "they have
CONFIRMED that the abovementioned Costa Rican citizens AT NO TIME
entered the territory of the Republic of Honduras." e)
On February 11, 1982, the Secretary General for Population and
Migration Policies of the Republic of Honduras issued a new
certification, of which we have a copy and which we continue to find a
very surprising document. It was asserted there that Yolanda Solís
Corrales had entered Honduras from Nicaragua in a private car on
December 12, 1981, through the Customs Post of Las Manos. It was also
stated that the files did not show that Francisco Fairén Garbi had ever
entered the country nor that either traveller had left Honduras. f)
On February 19, 1982, a letter was received from Mrs. Albertina
Bernhard de Zelaya, in her capacity as Plenipotentiary Ambassador of
Honduras to Costa Rica, indicating that the Honduran authorities were
still continuing to investigate this case, so far with no results. g)
On February 26, 1982, shortly after the new Ambassador of
Guatemala to Costa Rica took up his position, the Consulate of that
country received a certification dated February 3, 1982, attesting to
the fact that Francisco and his companion had both entered Guatemala
from Honduras on December 12, 1981, through the border post of El
Florido, leaving that country for El Salvador on December 14, 1981,
through the Valle Nuevo crossing. h)
As was to be expected, on March 10, 1982, the Costa Rican Foreign
Office received a note which we have described consistently as
"hurried" and "in keeping with the surprising context
surrounding our case." In a letter addressed to our Foreign
Minister, I made the following observation: "...ninety days after
the disappearance of both and after numerous exhaustive investigations
by the competent authorities, it is now asserted that Francisco and
Yolanda entered and left Honduras..." i)
On March 23, 1982, at the request of our Government, the Director
General of Migration of El Salvador certified that "a search of the
records of entries into the country was conducted at the crossing of
Chinamas and La Hachadura for the period from December 10 to December
20, 1981, without any migratory movements having been found for Messrs.
Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales, of Costa Rican
nationality." This statement served to reopen a process that evil
forces had tried to close. If the foregoing leads to conclusions
unfavorable to the Honduras authorities, I repeat that that is not our
fault either. The
investigation of the facts that led to the victims'
"disappearance" in Honduras was not the result of a whim. We
did not point to Honduras from the very beginning. We have already
stated that we went first to the Nicaraguan authorities, for the logical
reason that it is the closest country to us in a northerly direction.
And the authorities of that country gave us a prompt and satisfactory
reply. The trust we placed in the documents delivered to us by the
Nicaraguan authorities was later amply justified when the Honduran
authorities reluctantly admitted that Francisco and Yolanda had entered
Honduras. As can be seen, the inconsistencies have not been ours nor the
Nicaraguan Government's, which had nothing to do with this sad affair.
As for the Government of Guatemala, which also issued a couple of
contradictory retractions, it is not our fault if their actions give the
impression of being "fabrications", a term that has so
irritated the Honduran Government, perhaps precisely because of the
truth it contains. Consequently,
the position adopted by the claimant is not incongruous, as the Honduran
authorities assert when they state that I refuse to accept the proofs
presented by them to that Commission. That makes no sense. I am, in
fact, totally unaware of those proofs. It would be something else to say
that I refuse to accept the documentation that is already in my hands,
for that certainly forces me to maintain my position, that is, to point
in the direction of the Government and authorities of Honduras without
any desire to point in any other direction simply to satisfy those who
do not wish to be disturbed. If the Government of Honduras is able to
supply evidence that will convince us that neither Francisco nor Yolanda
is on Honduran territory, let me assure that Government that I will
leave it in peace and quiet, with my sincere apologies. As
has already been stated, and I repeat, the Honduran Government responded
to our first requests for information with a firm negative. It was not
until well into the month of March that we received a reply to the
effect that neither Francisco nor Yolanda had come into the country from
Nicaragua. The Plenipotentiary Ambassador of Honduras to the Government
of Costa Rica, Mrs. Zelaya, wrote me a letter stating that the Foreign
Minister had ratified this information during a meeting she had with him
in Tegucigalpa shortly before returning to her post in San José. She
went on to say that despite this, and because of our assertion that both
Francisco and Yolanda had been seen by well-known persons in downtown
Tegucigalpa, the authorities had resumed the search, the results of
which would be communicated to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Costa
Rica, with a copy to me. I must confess that, to date, the Ministry and
I are still awaiting the promised originals and copies. This goes to
show the lack of responsibility in the Honduran Government's handling of
this case. I
shall now transcribe for you a paragraph that strengthens the poor
impression I have formed of the Honduran investigations. It is taken
from statements made by Dr. Bernd Neihaus, Foreign Minister of Costa
Rica at the time of the "disappearances", to the Special
Commission appointed by our country's Congress to investigate the
disappearances and abuses to Costa Rican citizens in Honduras, at its
meeting of June 26, 1982. Dr. Neihaus declared the following: "...Apart
from this, there are two or three letters demanding the exhumation of
the body. And lastly a note, almost a protest, delivered personally by
me to the Ambassador of Honduras, who said to me: 'Minister, how is it
possible that two countries should fight over a case like this?' And I
replied: 'Madame Ambassador, the life of any Costa Rican is to me more
than sufficient motive to take a case to any extreme and although it is
obviously not my intention to go as far as a political confrontation
between the two countries, certainly I would demand the most thorough
investigation.' It really upset me very much that the Ambassador of
Honduras should look on it as a matter of scarce importance..." As
can be deduced from the words of the Ambassador of Honduras to our
Foreign Minister, the investigation of the facts that we demand, which
could well have been carried out by the Government of Honduras as a
routine police enquiry, rapidly acquired political characteristics in
the hands of the Government and its officials. Once again, it was not
our fault. In any event, please take note of the levels of good faith
and civility attained by Honduran diplomacy in this case and in what a
deplorable setting they have chosen to play with reasons of state. Although
I have already referred to this subject, I shall repeat myself. The note
from the Honduran Government affirms that I am only willing to accept
the certifications provided by the Nicaraguan Government which are, for
me, beyond suspicion. And it goes on to ask: why does he accept only
these proofs? Because only these are beyond suspicion? Well, I shall
tell them. The copies of the migration, transit or
"embarkation-debarkation" cards sent to us without comment by
the Nicaraguan authorities constituted a genuine, absolutely true and
believable proof, for they had been filled out by the travellers in
their own hand, which we are able to identify as such. The corresponding
certification reporting the youngsters' passage into Honduras which was
issued by the Nicaraguan authorities had to be accepted as correct,
since we had already found the preceding documents to be authentic. The
Honduran Government's admission that Francisco and Yolanda had, indeed,
entered its territory, proves us to be right. Whether or not it befits
the Honduran Government to respond to questions that nobody has posed is
not relevant to the case in point. In
concluding, the Honduran Government refers to the exhumation of a body
buried in the Tegucigalpa Cemetery which could well be Francisco's. Our
Foreign Office has repeatedly asked the Honduran Government for
permission to conduct an autopsy. If the Honduran authorities truly felt
that they were innocent, as they claim, we believe that they would long
ago have expedited the exhumation and autopsy requested, secure in the
knowledge that the findings would not harm the prestige of their
country. However, it being the manifest intention of these authorities
to oppose our petition, there is room for suspicion that their refusal
masks a fear that a compromising reality might be uncovered. I
am not very knowledgeable in matters of law. This is why I have my
doubts as to whether my interest in identifying the abovementioned
corpse should be shared by the Honduran Government: legal action should
be at the initiative of both parties; the law must work in both
directions if it is truly inspired by justice. If the Government of
Honduras decided to investigate, I have not the least doubt that it
would find no obstacles in its way. 9. In a note dated
January 24, 1983, the Government of Honduras responded to the claimant's
last letter, which had been sent on December 20, 1982 to the Government
of that country, as follows: ...
a.
Although domestic legal remedies have not been exhausted, as a
result of my Government's profound interest in contributing to the
discovery of the whereabouts of Messrs. Francisco Fairén Garbi and
Yoland Solís Corrales, both of Costa Rican nationality, the
Constitutional President of the Republic, Dr. Roberto Suazo Córdova,
has opportunely issued precise instructions to the various competent
organs of the State, asking them to perform an exhaustive investigation
that will convincingly throw light on the whereabouts or transit route
of the abovementioned persons. b.
This profound interest was reflected in Note 065-DSM, sent to the
Executive Secretariat on February 15, 1982. c.
From the objective investigations conducted, it has been
determined that the persons in question entered Honduras territory from
Nicaragua through the "Las Manos" border post in the
Department of El Paraíso, at 17:36 hours on December 11, 1981, leaving
the country at 15:00 hours on December 12 that same year through the
"El Florido" customs post in the Department of Copán,
supposedly on their way to the Republic of Guatemala, thus completing
their migratory cycle in my country. d.
The foregoing was transmitted to that Executive Secretariat
through Communication Nº 142 DGPE dated March 8, 1982, to which was
attached a photostatic copy of Migratory Control Vouchers Nº. 470859
and 470860, as well as a photostatic copy of the Border Pass issued in
the name of Francisco Fairén Garbi to allow him to cross Honduran
territory on his way to Guatemala, driving an Opel vehicle with Costa
Rican license plates Nº 39991, the full description of which is
contained in said border pass. e.
I take it that the foregoing was communicated by the Executive
Secretariat to the claimant, for he made a series of observations which
were attached to his communication dated May 12, 1982, to which this
Ministry replied by means of Document Nº 544 dated june 9, 1982. f.
The findings of these investigations were also transmitted to the
Honorable Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of Costa Rica, through
Note Nº 49-DGPE dated March 9, 1982, which was ratified and amended at
the request of the Special Committee appointed by the Plenary of the
Honorable Legislative Assembly of that country in Note Nº 316-DGPE
dated September 10 of that same year, the originals of which are in the
hands of the Honorable Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Worship of Costa
Rica, together with the attached copies of the Migratory Control
Vouchers and Border Pass referred to in previous paragraphs. In
view of the above and considering the full cooperation provided by my
Government for the solution of this case, as well as the fact that
Honduras is a State governed by the rule of law, I very cordially urge
the claimant to initiate legal proceedings through the channels
established by law as he sees fit, since he has not exhausted the
remedies and resources contemplated by the domestic laws of Honduras and
such action would be beneficial to the good name and prestige of the
Republic of Honduras and its institutions. 10.
On February 4, 1983, the Commission sent the claimant the
Honduran Government's reply, in order to elicit whatever observations he
wished to make. The claimant replied as follows in a note dated February
28: I
would first of all like to state that I consider it admirable that, as
the Honduran Government's reply
puts it, the President of Honduras, Dr. Roberto Suazo Córdova, should
have "opportunely issued precise instructions to the various
competent organs of the State, asking them to perform an exhaustive
investigation that will convincingly throw light on the whereabouts or
transit of the abovementioned persons". (He is referring to
Francisco and Yolanda). I appreciate this gesture and await the results,
for I refuse to believe and accept that these will be reduced to a mere
repetition of the exhibition of the third certification issued by the
Honduran Government, according to which the young travellers entered
Honduras only to leave that same day for Guatemalan territory. We
denounced that document at that time and were are not going to accept it
now. We are still convinced that the missing persons entered Honduras
and that there, for reasons we ignore, they became the victims of the
procedures habitually employed by the repressive forces of the State. I
think it would be useful to make some comments regarding the
"migratory control vouchers" to which the Honduran
communication makes reference. These certify, on the one hand, that the
travellers entered that country, a fact about which we have not the last
doubt. Those same vouchers also certify the departure of the young
couple to Guatemala, something we are not ready to believe. This
is nothing new. One thing worth noting, however, is that these vouchers
were strangely enough filled out by typewriter, which to my knowledge is
not the usual procedure; it is customary for these forms to be
handwritten by the interested parties, as you yourself must have done in
the course of your travels. The very "migratory control
vouchers" of which copies were sent to our Foreign Office clearly
show a line of print at the heading of the form that reads "filled
out by the traveller". And I sincerely do not believe that the
document was filled out on that occasion by either of the travellers.
Apart from the fact that the document in question was not filled out by
hand, nor offers any sample of the missing persons' handwriting, there
is another point that should be mentioned, namely, why is it that these
vouchers were not produced until March 10, 1982, exactly three months
after the disappearance of our youngsters? Had they been mislaid? It is
worth setting forth a theory that holds no risks, based on the sequence
of events, and cordially invite the Government of Honduras to refute it.
There
are sufficient reasons to believe that although they did not consider it
advisable, the Honduran authorities feigned ignorance of the
disappearances, in keeping with the canons governing such matters in
countries of a repressive nature. Any document evidencing the entry of
the young couple into Honduras would logically contradict this
intention. It was thought that silence alone would suffice to persuade
us to abandon any type of search, for it is certainly true that it makes
matters very difficult and totally disheartening. Nevertheless, we did
not become dispirited and insisted on the path known to all of you. In
an attempt to lead us astray and bring us up against absurd situations,
the Honduran authorities then proceeded to issue the most insane
document of the whole series: a certification bringing Yolanda into
Honduras territory but leaving my son outside. This was undoubtedly a
clever way of complicating matters even more by creating confusion and
discouragement among the seekers. Finally, a third certification was
produced, partly as a result of our constancy and the efforts of our
Government of the time to obtain something definite from the Government
of Honduras. And given that some governments seem to be allowed
everything, it was easy for the Honduran Government to transfer the
travellers in a truly meteoric race from its frontier with Nicaragua to
the Guatemala border, as if on winged feet they had barely grazed
Honduran soil. This was the equivalent of the closed silence encountered
at the beginning. In
view of its current interests and purposes, the Government of Honduras
is in no position to provide facts that will throw light on what
occurred. For it to yield now would be to show its true, arbitrary face.
It is therefore our opinion that the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights must now follow the procedures established in its Regulations, at
the discretion of its members. I
wish, in closing, to again thank the Government of Honduras, this time
for its cordial invitation to make use of the entire majestic machinery
of justice of that exemplary State, governed by the rule of law, which
would enable me to "initiate legal proceedings through the channels
established by law as I see fit." I consider that this offer
provides me with a magnificent opportunity, which I shall not pass by,
to ask the Honduran authorities whether they have already solved the
cases of the 54 persons who disappeared in their country in 1981,
disappearances which were denounced by the "Christian Commission on
Human Rights" of the "Christian Movement for Justice." I
would like to add that I wish to know the status of the investigations
into the whereabouts of the Costa Rican national Eduardo Blanco,
presumed to have been arrested, tortured and killed by members of the
DNI during the month of November of that same year. I would also like to
be informed of the progress made in investigations into the discovery of
clandestine cemeteries attributed to the repressive forces of the
Honduran police and army: whether those responsible have been
identified, tried, condemned and jailed or whether, on the contrary,
what the "El Heraldo" newspaper in Tegucigalpa feared would
happen has occurred. As that paper put it in its edition for February
25, 1982, "THE PEOPLE EXPECT THE GOVERNMENT'S PROMISE TO BE KEPT
AND THAT THERE WILL NOT BE A REPETITION OF WHAT HAS OCCURRED IN THE PAST
WHEN IT WAS SAID THAT THESE SITUATIONS WOULD BE CORRECTED, FOR THOSE
PROMISES ONLY SERVED TO DRAW A VEIL OF OBLIVION OVER THE ISSUES THAT
WERE SUPPOSEDLY UNDER INVESTIGATION." In
the meantime, forgive me if I say that I refuse the generous offer made
to me, in the profound conviction that the means to which I have had
recourse in order to investigate and solve the unfortunate case of the
disappearance of my son Francisco Fairén Garbi and his companion,
Yolanda Solís Corrales, are the correct ones. I place all my trust in
the competence, rectitude and authority of the Inter-American Commission
on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of the OAS.
11.
The IACHR has also received communications dated September 13,
1983 and March 22, 1984, in which the claimant supplies information
bearing on this case. Such information has been included in the
pertinent dossier. WHEREAS:
1. The fact that
Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales, bearers of Costa
Rican passports, left San Jose, Costa Rica by road on December 8, 1981,
in a private car, bound for Códova, State of Veracruz, Mexico, can be
considered to be incontrovertible. Not
only is the above asserted by the claimant, but it is also confirmed by
the Government of Nicaragua in a note reporting the entry of the two
persons in question into its territory and their departure for Honduras.
2. In like manner,
the fact that Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales
entered Nicaraguan territory during their trip can also be deemed
proven. That fact implicit in the reports of the Embassy of that country
in Costa Rica, for the Nicaraguan authorities from the very first
(January 8, 1982) certified that the two persons now missing departed
Nicaragua on December 11, 1981 through the "Las Manos" border
post, crossing into Honduran territory. 3. The
communications presented subsequently by the Governments of Honduras and
Guatemala do not have the same coherence that the reports from the
Nicaraguan Government shown Specifically: a) On January 14,
1982, a note signed by the First Secretary and Consul of the Embassy of
Guatemala in San José de Costa Rica categorically declares that the
missing persons "neither entered nor left Guatemala" between
December 8 and 12, 1981, "a fact that is recorded in the Department
of Migration of Guatemala." Considering
that the subjects had entered Honduras (according to the certification
of the Nicaraguan Government) and had not left that country (according
to the report of the Government of Guatemala) the logical conclusion
would be that said persons remained on Honduran territory. b) The Government
of Honduras, in turn, issued an initial statement to the effect that the
missing persons did not appear on a computer print-out of entries into
Honduras between December 8 and 15, 1981, according the clarifications
made to the Consul of Costa Rica in Honduras. This
would lead to the unacceptable conclusion that the two young people were
in none of the countries covered by their travel itinerary. c) There was, at
least initially, a flagrant contradiction between the reports of the
Governments of Nicaragua and Guatemala and the reports of the Government
of Honduras which, at the time, made it impossible to determine which
information was correct, since the three abovementioned States all
denied the presence of Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís
Corrales on their territories. 4. On February 11,
1982, the Government of Honduras admitted something new in a
document signed by the Secretary General for Population and Migration
Policies, namely, that contrary to what had previously been asserted,
Yolanda Solís Corrales did enter Honduras on December 12, 1981. And,
at the same time, the document went on to certify that the same could
not be said of Francisco Fairén Garbi, with the additional
significant information that no record existed of the departure of
either of the Costa Rican citizens from Honduran territory. 5. The initial
contradiction becomes even more involved when the Ambassador of Honduras
in Costa Rica, through a note dated February 19, 1982 signed by Mrs.
Albertina Bernhard de Zelaya, Ambassador of Honduras, communicates her
Government's intention to resume the investigations, because up to that
time there was no "evidence of entry into Honduras by the persons
in question", whereas Yolanda Solís Corrales, at least, had
verifiably entered Honduras, as confirmed in the abovementioned
certificate issued on February 11 by the Secretary General for
Population and Migration Policies. 6. The Government
of Guatemala, in turn, initially denied the existence of records
substantiating the entry of the two missing persons into its territory
between December 8 and 12, 1981. The corresponding certificate, signed
by Mr. Carlos Augusto López Santizo, First Secretary and Consul of the
Embassy of Guatemala in San José, Costa Rica, is dated January 14,
1982. Nevertheless,
on February 3, 1982, the Department of Migration of the Republic of
Guatemala contradicts the above diplomatic document of January 14 in a
document signed by the Chief Inspector of Migration, Mr. Ismael Morales
Chinchilla, and by Inspector Nº 4 Jorge Solares Zavala, indicating that
Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales entered Guatemala
through the "El Florido" migration post on December 12, 1981.
The document adds that both persons left Guatemala the following
December 14, through the "Valle Nuevo" migration post, crossing
into El Salvador. 7. In a
certificate of Migratory Movements dated March 23, 1982 and signed by
the Director General of Migration, which is in the hands of the
Commission, the Government of El Salvador certified that "records
of the entry into the country of Messrs. Francisco Fairén Garbi and
Yolanda Solís Corrales, of Costa Rican nationality, were sought by the
Delegations of Chinamas and La Hachadura for the period from December 10
to 20, 1981, without any migratory movements being found in those
names..." 8. The
documentation produced by the Guatemalan authorities contradicts the
information given by the Honduran authorities, according to whom only
Yolanda entered Honduran territory. The inaccuracy of that information
was expressly acknowledged by the Government of Honduras in an urgent
telex sent to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Costa Rica on March 10,
1982, transcribing a letter addressed to the Ambassador in Tegucigalpa
by Minister Edgardo Paz Barnica. That
document asserts that, following more exhaustive investigations, it was
finally possible to prove that the two missing persons did, indeed,
enter Honduran territory through the border crossing of "las
Manos" on the afternoon of December 11, 1981, the start of their
migratory cycle being dated the 12th. 9. What stands
out, then, is what Nicaragua reported (and was finally accepted by the
Government of Honduras), namely, that the two missing persons had,
indeed, entered Honduran territory. The
Government of Honduras admits that the missing persons entered the
country and declares that they crossed into Guatemala; the latter
country, in turn, reports that the two young people immediately
continued their trip into El Salvador. Thid last Government, as stated
in point 7 of this section, denied that these persons had entered its
territory. 10.
The claimant did not bring any action before the Judiciary of
Honduras and thus did not have recourse to the remedies contemplated by
that State. In the Commission's opinion, the exhaustion of domestic
legal remedies is not deemed necessary, in view of the fact that the
claimant's inquiries before the various governments were such that this
requirement can be deemed to have been satisfied, especially considering
the time elapsed since the events occurred. 11.
There can be no doubt that Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda
Solís Corrales entered Honduran territory, as that State has finally
admitted despite its initial denials, it is doubtful that they ever left
Honduras, given the peculiar features of the emigration cards which bear
no signature, are typewritten (contrary to what is customary), and were
delivered three months after the events occurred; the Government of
Honduras did not attempt, through its Judiciary, to fully establish the
identity of the body of the young man found with three bullet wounds in
the place known as "La Montañita", 20 Kms. away from
Tegucigalpa, for a second exhumation was not performed as had been
requested through the Costa Rican Foreign Office; and no investigation
have been carried out by the Honduran Judiciary to throw light on the
facts denounced, despite the Commission's efforts. On the contrary, the
many contradictions in which that Government incurred make it impossible
to accept the version that the Costa Rican nationals had left Honduras. The
foregoing conclusive, concordant and irrefutable presumptions lead the
Commission to the conclusion that the State of Honduras is responsible
for the disappearance of Messrs. Francisco Fairén Garbi and Yolanda Solís
Corrales. THEREFORE:
THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. To declare that
the facts reported in the denunciation constitute grave violations of
the right to life (Article 4) and the right to personal liberty (Article
7) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and that the Government
of Honduras is responsible for the disappearance of Francisco Fairén
Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales, of Costa Rican nationality. 2. To recommend
that the Government of Honduras: a. Order the most
thorough investigation of the events denounced, in order to establish
the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Francisco Fairén
Garbi and Yolanda Solís Corrales; b. Punish those
responsible for the events denounced, in accordance with Honduran Law; c. Inform the
Commission, within 90 days, of the measures taken to implement the above
recommendations. 3. To transmit
this Resolution to the Government of Honduras. 4. If the Government of Honduras presents no observations within the term stipulated in item 2 of this Resolution, the Commission shall include this Resolution in its Annual Report to the General Assembly, pursuant to Article 59 (g) of the Regulations of the Commission, and shall transmit this Resolution to the claimant in this case. |