|
RESOLUTION Nš 7/84 CASE
7604 Jamaica May 11, 1984 BACKGROUND: 1. In December
1980, Roosevelt Edwards, a Jamaican citizen acting on his own behalf,
submitted a communication to the Inter-American Commission on Human
Rights in which he stated that in January 1975 he was tried, convicted
and sentenced to death for the murder of Percival Wilshire on March 16,
1974, in the Parish of Kingston, a crime of which he claimed he was
innocent. It
was alleged that in March 1974, Roosevelt Edwards rode a bicycle along
Spanish Town Road and fired several shots at another man, one of them
hitting and crippling this man and another killing a bystander. The
shooting was witnessed by dozens of persons but none of them came
forward as witnesses. Only the crippled man, his girlfriend and a
policeman gave evidence at the trial. None of them knew the plaintiff
before the trial but the crippled man, who, admittedly was shot from
behind, had no or little opportunity to see the gunman. Following
the trial, a witness for the defense was found, and in July 1975 the
Court of Appeal granted permission for the witness to give evidence
before them. In May 1976, the witness was finally heard by the Court of
Appeal and the appeal was rejected. Roosevelt Edwards complains of
unfair trial. 2. The Commission,
by Note of January 8, 1981, transmitted to the Government of Jamaica the
pertinent parts of the communication and, taking into consideration the
fact that the plaintiff, because of his status--being kept on Death
Row--cannot furnish the necessary information and documentation to
satisfy the requirements of the Regulations and also to prove his
allegations, requested that the Government of Jamaica provide
information regarding the allegations contained in the denunciation
together with any other information which would permit the Commission to
determine whether the internal legal remedies and procedures had been
duly applied and exhausted in this case. The plaintiff was advised of
this request by letter of the same date. 3. By letter dated
March 19, 1981, the plaintiff informed the Commission that the Court of
Appeal had dismissed his appeal against the conviction and sentence on
February 4, 1981. He also stated that he was tried in the "absence
of his defense counsel," therefore, without being duly represented
before the Court and also that "the very same Judge who presided
over his trial and conviction on January 15, 1975 at the St. Thomas
Circuit Court, sat on the Court of Appeal." 4. The Commission
acknowledged receipt of this letter and at the same time, by Note of
March 20, 1981, transmitted the additional information to the Government
of Jamaica and advised it that because of the new elements introduced in
the case, the Commission urgently requested that it take whatever
measures it deemed necessary so that all information relevant to the
case including the transcripts of the proceedings of the St. Thomas
Circuit Court as well as those of the Circuit Court of Appeal
proceedings be received as soon as possible. The plaintiff was informed
of this request. 5. Because the
Commission received no answer to its Notes of January 8 and March 20, by
Note of August 4, 1982, it reiterated its requests for information and
documentation and informed the Government of Jamaica of the possible
application of Article 39 of the Regulations if such request was not
satisfied within a reasonable time. The plaintiff was advised of this
action. 6. By Note Nš
6/80/1 dated August 27, 1982, the Government of Jamaica responded to the
Commission's Note of August 4, 1982 advising it that the information
would be provided as soon as the appropriate investigation undertaken by
the Ministry of National Security and Justice had been completed. The
plaintiff was informed of these developments by letter of September 1,
1982. 7. By Note Nš
6/80/1 dated September 22, 1982, the Government of Jamaica provided a
copy of the transcripts of the trial in the Home Circuit Court and the
application for leave to appeal the conviction and sentence of Roosevelt
Edwards. 8. By letter of
October 2, 1982, the plaintiff informed the Commission that he had been
granted a stay of execution, that he had a "witness willing to come
forward and testify as to his innocence and also that his case would
soon be reviewed". 9. The Commission,
by Note of May 3, 1983 informed the Government of Jamaica that it had
additional information with regard to the case, and that this
information as well as a review of the Court's transcripts of the
initial trial led the Commission to believe that the plaintiff had
possibly not enjoyed the full benefit of a fair trial guaranteed by the
American Convention on Human Rights. The Commission therefore, requested
that the Government provide copies of the transcripts of the Court of
Appeal hearing held on June 26, 1976, together with the results of the
Ministry of National Security and Justice's investigation regarding the
case of Roosevelt Edwards and any other information which would enable
the Commission to reach a conclusion in this case. This request was
reiterated on September 27, 1983. 10.
By Note Nš 6/80/1 of March 6, 1984, the Government of Jamaica
provided a copy of the transcripts of the Court of Appeal hearings and
the review of the case held on May 14, 1976 and December 3, 1982
respectively. WHEREAS:
1. The information
and documentation submitted to the Commission indicate that all domestic
legal remedies have been exhausted and none of the conditions of
inadmissibility established in the American Convention on Human Rights
were present, therefore, there exists no reason not to declare this case
admissible. 2. The documents
submitted by the Government of Jamaica show that Mr. Justice White
before whom the case of Roosevelt Edwards was tried in the Home Circuit
Court of Kingston was not a member of the panel of judges of the Court
of Appeal which heard the appeal of the case on April 5 and 6 and May
14, 1976, contrary to the allegations contained in the plaintiff's
letter of March 19, 1981 to the Commission; 3. The case of
Roosevelt Edwards was reviewed and the evidence of his witnesses
received by the Court of Appeal on October 13, 15 and 19 and December 3,
1982; 4. A study of the
transcripts of the Home Circuit Court and the Court of Appeal as well as
of the conduct of the trial of Roosevelt Edwards and review of his case
show that the rules of criminal procedure were observed and that the
plaintiff received a fair trial; 5. During his
trials, Roosevelt Edwards was assisted by defense counsel, 6. The documents
submitted to the Commission show that the requirements of due process
have been fulfilled. THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. To declare that
there exists no evidence of the violation of any of the rights set forth
in the American Convention on Human Rights; 2. To communicate
this Resolution to the Government of Jamaica and to the plaintiff; and 3. To recommend
that the Government of Jamaica suspend the execution of those persons
sentenced to death, commute the sentence of Roosevelt Edwards and
consider the abolition of the death penalty.
[ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
|