|
RESOLUTION Nš 6/83[1] CASE
7316 NICARAGUA April 15, 1983 BACKGROUND:
1. Through a
communication dated January 28, 1980, the following complaint was lodged
with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: The kidnapping of Mr. Marco Antonio Vega Duarte, secondary student of 17 years of age, is denounced. He was captured in June 1979 by the Somoza Guard who gave him a savage beating and later tortured him in the Bunker's jails where he was taken after being held at Police Headquarters. On Liberation Day he was able to leave that jail but not to his home; rather, he was immediately taken to the Red Cross located in the Campo Bruce neighborhood. There, he was given medical attention due to his lamentable condition, his body covered by scars. However, the most serious revelation was that he had lost his mind due to the brutal tortures he was subjected to in the Office of Security. Thus,
because midst of his insanity and due to the confusion the Sandinista
victory provoked in him, Marco Antonio stated that he belonged to the
FSLN Staff, that he was a guerrilla Commander and that his alias was
Jonathan. It was under these circumstances that on August 8, he was
captured, probably by mistake or on suspicion, since due to his mental
state his appearance was bizarre. I believe that they mistook him for
someone else, because that is the only way I can understand that he
would be captured by a military convoy consisting of 5 vehicles full of
militiamen. On
the same day of his arrest, Marco Antonio was taken to his home, beaten
and wounded. Supposedly he had stated that there was a "stool
pigeon" in his home and he was taken there for the purpose of
identifying the alleged "informant." He was taken prisoner and
his family was told to go to the Chipote office. The next day, they were
told at that place that there was no prisoner with that name there. It
is presumed that he is dead. 2. In a written
communication dated June 10, 1980, the Commission transmitted the
pertinent parts of this complaint to the Government of Nicaragua,
requesting that it provide the appropriate information. 3. In a written
communication dated January 27, 1981, the Commission reiterated its
request for information to the Government of Nicaragua and informed them
that, if that information was not provided within the established time,
the facts reported in the petition, whose pertinent parts had been
transmitted to the government, would be presumed to be true, in
application of Article 39 of the Regulations. CONSIDERING:
1. That, to this
date, the Government of Nicaragua has not responded to the Commission's
requests for information relating to the foregoing case. 2. That from the
absence of a response by the Government of Nicaragua to the Commission's
request for information, it is inferred that there are no grounds to
hold a hearing to reach an amicable settlement as provided for in the
Commission's Regulations. 3. That Article 39
of the Regulations establishes the following: Article
39 The
facts reported in the petition whose pertinent parts have been
transmitted to the government of the state in reference shall be
presumed to be true if, during the maximum period set by the Commission
under the provisions of Article 31, paragraph 5, the government has not
provided the pertinent information, as long as other evidence does not
lead to a different conclusion. THE
INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, RESOLVES: 1. Based on
Article 39 of the Regulations, the facts denounced in the communication
dated January 28, 1980, relating to the kidnapping and disappearance of
the student Marco Antonio Vega Duarte, are presumed to be true. 2. To declare that
the Government of Nicaragua has violated Article 4 (right to life),
Article 7 (right to personal liberty), and Article 8 (judicial
guarantees) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 3. To recommend to
the Government of Nicaragua that it conduct an exhaustive investigation
to determine those persons directly or indirectly responsible for the
facts denounced in order that the applicable legal sanctions may be
applied, and communicate to the Commission, within a maximum period of
sixty days, the decision adopted. 4. To communicate
this resolution to the Government of Nicaragua and to the complainants. 5. If the
Government of Nicaragua has not submitted observations by the expiration
of the deadline set in paragraph 3 of this resolution, the Commission
will include this resolution in its Annual Report to the General
Assembly of the Organization of American States, in accordance with
Article 59, paragraph (g) of the Commission's Regulations.
[1]
The Government of Nicaragua, by way if its note of September 19,
1983, requested reconsideration of this Resolution. The IACHR
studied the request of the Government and adopted the Resolution
which appears on page 120 of this Annual Report. |