REPORT Nº 52/00
I.
SUMMARY 1.
The instant report on admissibility covers Cases 11.830 and 12.038,
which have been combined because
they concern the same events, namely the dismissal of a group of 257 employees
of the National Congress of the Republic of Peru (hereinafter “Peru”,
“the State” or “the Peruvian State”), who attempted, by means of
domestic legal remedies, to impugn two executive decisions issued in 1992,
whereby a total of 1,117 employees of that Congress were dismissed. The
petitioners claim that Peru violated, to the detriment of the aforementioned
257 dismissed employees, who pursued the remedies under domestic law, the
rights to a fair trial and judicial protection enshrined in Articles 8 and 25
of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter the “Convention”
or the “American Convention”). The State contended that the case was
inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies. The Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Commission”, “the
Inter-American Commission” or “the IACHR”) considers that the situation
that must be taken into account, in order to determine if domestic remedies
have been exhausted, is that which exists at the moment of adopting a decision
on admissibility, and decides to admit the petitions as regards the alleged
violations of the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection enshrined
in Articles 8 and 25, respectively, of the American Convention on Human
Rights, without prejudging the merits of the matter. II.
PROCESSING BY THE COMMISSION 2.
The petition relating to Case 11.830, originally lodged as an
application for precautionary measures by Messrs. Adolfo Fernández Sare,
Angela Valdéz Rivera, Roberto Ribotte Rodríguez, María Huaranga Soto, and
Manuel Carranza Rodríguez, both in their own name, and on behalf of other
dismissed congressional employees, was received by the IACHR on October 18,
1997. The Commission opened the case on November 10, 1997, transmitted the
pertinent portions of the petition to the State, and requested it for
information to be submitted within a period of 90 days.
Peru replied on January 26, 1998. On March 26, 1998, the petitioners
lodged a petition with the Commission that reproduced the alleged facts
contained in the original application for precautionary measures, as well as
submitting a copy of a judgment delivered by the Constitutional Court on
November 24, 1997, published in the
official gazette, “El Peruano,” on January 12, 1998.
3. On February 4,
1999, Pedro Antonio Quiñones Seminario and Augusto Salomón Bellindo Orihuela,
both former congressional employees asked to named as co-petitioners in the
case. Both parties submitted additional information and observations on
different occasions. In a communication of October 20, 1999, the Bar
Association of Lima asked to be named as co-petitioner in the case and
presented letters from various former congressional employees requesting that
they be represented by the said Bar Association in Case 11.830 before the
IACHR. 4.
In addition, the petition relating to Case 12.038 was received by the
IACHR on July 10, 1998. That petition was lodged by Messrs. Zoila Luz Begazo
Salazar, Jorge Luis Pacheco Munayco, and 19 other persons, acting both in
their own name and on behalf of other employees dismissed from the Congress.
The Commission opened the case on August
4, 1998, transmitted the pertinent portions of the petition to the
Peruvian State, and requested it for information to be submitted within a
period of 90 days. Peru applied
for an extension in which to respond and, this granted, did so on November 11,
1998. On June 28, 1999, the Commission received an amicus
curiae brief from the National Ombudsman [of Peru]. 5.
On June 9, 2000, the Commission, in accordance with the provisions set
forth in Article 40(2) of its Regulations, combined the petitions relating to
Cases 11.830 and 12.038, and decided to continue to hear them in the
proceedings in Case 11.830. At the same time, the IACHR advised both Peru and
all of the petitioners of that fact.
III.
POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES
A.
Position of the petitioners
6.
The petitioners claim that on April 5, 1992, the head of the Executive
Branch of the Peruvian Government, Alberto Fujimori, ordered the dissolution
of Congress and the complete reorganization of the Judicial Branch, the
Constitutional Court, the National Judiciary Council, the Office of the
Attorney General, and the Office of the Inspector General. The petitioners
assert that such a situation led to the arbitrary removal of officials and
employees who had been appointed to their posts in accordance with regulations
that predated April 5, 1992.
7.
The petitioners say that the congressional personnel were laid off from
their jobs by Executive Decisions Nos. 1303-A-92-CACL and 1303-B-92-CACL,
which provided for the dismissal of a total of 1,117 congressional employees
and were published on December 31, 1992, in the official gazette, “El
Peruano”. They claim that the dismissal was carried out without the least
respect for the guarantees of due process, and that it was totally arbitrary
inasmuch as it was not supported by any of the grounds provided for in the
regulations in force at the time.
8.
The petitioners say that a group of 234 former congressional employees
filed an amparo suit appealing the
aforesaid executive decisions, which was heard by the 28th Civil Court of
Lima. By judgment of June 26, 1995, that court upheld the petition and ordered
that the employees who instituted the aforesaid proceeding be reinstated in
their jobs.
9.
The petitioners say that the Fifth Chamber for Civil Matters of the
Superior Court of Lima, on hearing the appeal filed against the lower court
decision, delivered a new judgment on February 21, 1996, and reversed the
decision of the lower court. The petitioners filed a special appeal [recurso
extraordinario] with the Constitutional Court against that judgment. At
the time the petition was lodged with the Commission, a decision was pending
on the appeal.
10.
The petitioners say that the Constitutional Court issued a decision on
November 24, 1997, that was published in the official gazette, "El
Peruano," on January 12, 1998, and upheld the judgment of the appellate
court. In the course of the trial other employees had joined the amparo
suit, with the upshot that the above decision of the Constitutional Court
finally applied to the 257 employees whose names are mentioned in the annex to
the instant report. The petitioners add that the evidence they presented to
the Constitutional Court was not accorded its due value. They mention their
disagreement with the legal reasoning used in the above-mentioned judgment of
the appellate court and in the aforesaid decision of the Constitutional Court,
and declared that it amounted overall to a violation of the rights to a fair
trial and judicial protection recognized in Articles 8 and 25 of the American
Convention. They say that the Constitutional Court was not and impartial
tribunal, due to the removal of three of its members by the Congress, and to
the fact that the remaining judges of that court lacked the requisite
independence and impartiality to hear the case. B.
Position of the State
11.
With respect to Case 11.830, the State claimed that the proceedings in
connection with the amparo suit brought by the petitioners were continuing
before the Constitutional Court, and that the delay in reaching a decision was
due to the need to safeguard the procedural guarantees of the parties
involved. The State added that the claimants acted improperly in appealing to
international jurisdiction, when there were available to them suitable
procedural mechanisms under domestic law for challenging any acts or decisions
that threaten or injure fundamental rights.
12.
With regard to the formal requirements for its admission, the State
said that petition lodged by the petitioners had to be examined independently
of their initial application for precautionary measures. The State claimed
that the allegations made in the petition are unfounded. As to violation of
the guarantee of due process, the State maintained that the petitioners did
not during the proceedings before the courts file any action designed to stop
the alleged violation of due process. Accordingly,
the Peruvian State considered that the failure to pursue the remedies provided
by domestic law resulted in the loss of the right to petition the IACHR.
13. The
State argued that in the domestic sphere the Peruvian state has undergone a
process of modernization and that, more specifically, the Congress has been
redesigned, which has led to a 50% reduction in the overall number of members
of Congress and the axing of a large number of jobs.
14.
The State held that the petition is inadmissible inasmuch as domestic
remedies had not been exhausted at the time it was lodged.
15. As to Case
12.038, the State requested its joinder to Case 11.830, since both concerned
the same events and the same allegedly injured persons. IV.
ANALYSIS A.
The Commission’s Competence ratione
personae, ratione materiae and ratione
temporis
16.
Under Article 44 of the American Convention the petitioners are
entitled to lodge petitions with the IACHR.[1]
Those petitions name as alleged victims individuals, in respect of whom Peru
undertook to respect and ensure the rights enshrined in the Convention.[2]
Insofar as the State is concerned, the Commission observes that Peru became a
state party to the American Convention upon ratifying it on July 28, 1978.
Accordingly, the Commission is competent ratione
personae to examine the petitions.
17.
The Commission is also competent ratione
materiae and ratione temporis,
inasmuch as the facts alleged in the respective petitions tend to establish
violations of rights protected by the American Convention, and by reason of
that fact that the events in question have purportedly occurred during or
after 1992, when the duty to respect and ensure the rights recognized in the
Convention was in force for the Peruvian State. B.
Admissibility requirements for the petition a.
Exhaustion of domestic remedies 18.
The Peruvian State claims that the petition in Case 11.830, received by
the IACHR on October 18, 1997, was lodged prior to exhaustion of the remedies
under domestic law. The decision of the Constitutional Court, which -both
parties agree- exhausted the remedies under domestic law, was issued on
November 24, 1997, and published on January 12, 1998. 19.
In respect of the above, the Commission observes that the
aforementioned petition was indeed lodged prior to exhaustion of the remedies
under domestic law. Such a circumstance, however, is not stand in the way of
its admissibility at the current stage of the case. The admissibility
requirements to be met by a petition must be examined, generally speaking, at
the moment at which the Commission pronounces on its admissibility. Article 46
of the Convention states that “[A]dmission
by the Commission of a petition or communication lodged in accordance with
Articles 44 or 45 shall be subject to the following requirements: a) that the
remedies under domestic law have been pursued and exhausted in accordance with
generally recognized principles of international law.”
With respect to the foregoing, the moment of lodging a petition is distinct
from that of pronouncement on its admissibility. Article 33 of the Regulations
of the IACHR, for instance, authorizes the Commission to ask
the petitioner to complete the requirements omitted in the petition, should
the Commission consider that the “petition is inadmissible or incomplete.”
20.
To accept the argument of Peru to the effect that the aforementioned
petition is allegedly inadmissible, inasmuch as at the moment it was lodged
the remedies under domestic law had not been exhausted, in spite of the fact
that at the present instance, as the Commission is pronouncing on
admissibility, those remedies have been exhausted, would imply a formalistic
decision totally at odds with the protection of the human rights enshrined in
the Convention. Such a decision would also leave the alleged victims in a
state of defenselessness, since the Commission would probably be unable to
examine their case, even were a new petition concerning the same events to be
lodged in the future. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has held that
“[I]t is generally accepted that the procedural system is a means of
attaining justice and that the latter cannot be sacrificed for the sake of
mere formalities.” 21.
The Commission concludes that the situation that must be taken into
consideration in order to determine if the remedies under domestic law have
been exhausted is that which exists at the moment of adopting a decision on
admissibility. Consequently, the Commission finds that the requirement of
exhaustion of the remedies under domestic law provided in Article 46 (1) (a)
of the American Convention was met with the decision of the Constitutional
Court issued on November 24, 1997, and published on January 12, 1998. 22.
With respect to the petition in Case 12.038, the Commission observes
that said petition was lodged on July 10, 1998, by which date the remedies
under domestic law had been duly exhausted. b.
Filing Period
23.
The Commission finds that in Case 11.830 the petition was lodged prior
to the date of the decision that exhausted domestic remedies, whereas in Case
12.038 the petition was received by the IACHR on July 10, 1998, in other
words, before six months had elapsed following publication, on January 12,
1998, of the decision of the Constitutional Court that exhausted the remedies
under domestic law. Therefore, the requirement established in Article 46 (1)
(b) of the American Convention has been met.
c.
Duplication of proceedings and res
judicata
24.
The Commission finds that the subject of the petition is not pending in
another international proceeding for settlement, nor is the petition
substantially the same as one previously studied by the Commission or by
another international organization. Accordingly,
the requirements set forth in Articles 46 (1) (c) and 47 (d) have also been
met.
d.
Nature of the violations
25.
The
Commission believes that the facts alleged by the petitioners, if proven true,
could constitute violations of rights protected by the American Convention.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
26.
The
Commission concludes that it is competent to take up the petitions under
review, and that, pursuant to Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention,
said
petitions are admissible in the
terms set out above.
27.
Based
on the factual and legal arguments given above, and without prejudging the
merits of the case,
THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES: 1.
To declare the above-mentioned petitions admissible as regards the
alleged violations of the rights to a fair trial and to judicial protection
protected in Articles 8 and 25, respectively, of the American Convention on
Human Rights, without prejudging the merits of the matter. 2.
To
notify the petitioners and the State of this decision; 3.
To
continue with its analysis of the merits of the case; 4. To
publish this decision and to include it in its Annual Report to the OAS
General Assembly. Done
and signed at Brasilia, Brazil, on this the 15th day of June 2000.
Signed: Hélio Bicudo, Chair; Claudio Grossman, First Vice Chair; Juan
Méndez, Second Vice Chair; Commission Members:
Marta Altolaguirre, Robert K. Goldman, Peter Laurie and Julio Prado
Vallejo. [ Table of Contents | Previous | Next ]
[1] Without prejudice to its authority to pronounce on
this point in its decision on the merits, the IACHR finds that in the case
under review the legal standing of the petitioners has not been questioned.
[2] In light of the fact that both the petition in Case
11.830 and that in Case 12.038 specifically name a number of ‑persons,
while adding the phrase “and others”, and that while processing the case
the IACHR has received from the petitioners various lists of names of
alleged victims, as well as having also received joinder applications from
other persons asking to be named as alleged victims, the IACHR regards as
alleged victims all the persons covered by the decision of the
Constitutional Court of November 24, 1997, who are specifically named in the
annex to the instant report. The foregoing without prejudice to holding as
alleged victims the respective relatives of the deceased persons who are on
that list, or diminishing such decisions as the IACHR might adopt in respect
of other incidents that might arise. [3] Inter-Am. Ct.H.R., Cayara Case, Preliminary Objections, Judgment of February 3, 1993, para. 42. |
LIST OF PERSONS COVERED BY THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF NOVEMBER 24, 1997, WHO ARE REGARDED AS ALLEGED VICTIMS IN THE RECORD CONTAINING CASES 11.830 AND 12.038 BEFORE THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. |
1. Aguado Alfaro,
José |
48. Chávez García, Bladimir |
95. Gonzáles Panuera, Luis |
2. Aguilar Rojas,
Felix |
49. Cherrez
Córdova, Rosa |
96. Gonzáles Sánchez, Anabel Iris |
3. Aguilar Rojas,
Gisela |
50. Chino
Villegas, Wilfredo |
97. Grández
Alvarado César |
4. Albornoz Alva,
Luis Rodolfo |
51. Chipana Quispe, Tiburcio |
98. Guevara Gallo, Rodolfo |
5. Alcántara Ramos, Juana |
52. Chipana Rodríquez, Luis |
99. Guzmán Rebatta, Juan |
6. Aliaga Lama, Luis |
53. Cisneros
Urbina, Esther |
100. Hayasshi Bejarano, Folgges Luis |
7. Alvarado Achicahuala, Juan |
54. Clerque Gonzáles, José |
101. Hernández
Fernández, Ricardo |
8. Alvarado
Galván, Eriberto Rodolfo |
55. Cobeñas
Pariamache, Felix |
102. Herrera Madueño, Caro |
9. Alvarado
Suárez, Mónica Lourdes |
56. Colán Villegas, Laura |
103. Herrera Rojas, Lucas |
10. Alvarez Gutiérrez, Marleni |
57. Condezo Espinoza, Antonio |
104. Herrera Valdez, Reynaldo |
11. Ampuero Ampuero, Victor |
58. Córdova
Melgarejo, Antonia Elizabeth |
105. Hijar Cerpa,
Andrés |
12. Angeles
Ponte, Nancy Violeta |
59. Cornelio
Dávila, Hipólito |
106. Hinojosa
Silva, Jesús |
13. Araca Sosa,
José Raúl |
60. Cornelio
Figueroa, Daysi |
107. Hinostroza Toro, Tito |
14. Arcos Díaz,
Cecilia |
61. Coronado
Peña, José Raúl |
108. Huamán Cárdenas, Juan |
15. Arévalo
Torres, Rosa |
62. Cuadros
Livelli, Manuel |
109. Huamán Trinidad, Wilfredo Emilio |
16. Arias Infantes, Guillermo |
63. Cubas Vásquez, Lupo |
110. Huamantumba Vásquez, Mery |
17. Arnez Macedo, Daniel |
64. De la Cruz Paredes, Marcial |
111. Huaraca Vargas, Olimpio |
18. Atauje Montes, Máximo |
65. De la Cruz Paredes, Walter |
112. Huaranga Soto, María |
19. Ayala Palomino, Herlinda |
66. Del Aguila Chamaya, Dully |
113. Hurtado
Gutiérrez, Miguel |
20. Ballarta Rueda, Alfredo |
67. Del Castillo Meza, Victor |
114. Ibánez
Ortiz, Sara |
21. Barba Ureña,
Telmo Jaime |
68. Delgado Gómez, Juan Francisco |
115. Ibarra Nato, Susana |
22. Barbarán Quispe, Jaime |
69. Delgado Suárez, Raquel |
116. Inga Coronado, María |
23. Bautista Apolaya, Max |
70. Dergán Alcántara, Gloria |
117. Infantes Vásquez, María |
24. Begazo Salazar, Zoila Luz |
71. Dextre Cano, Edgar |
118. Jaimes Cano, Marco Antonio |
25. Belleza Cabanillas, Inés |
72. Dextre Ordóñez, Edison |
119. Kitano la Torre, Elsi Judith |
26. Bellido Orihuela, Augusto |
73. Díaz Campos, Flavio |
120. La Cruz Crespo, Carlos |
27. Beltrán Aguilar, Leoncio |
74. Díaz Céspedes, Nina |
121. Loayza Arcos, Lucy |
28. Bereche Riojas, Lidia |
75. Díaz López,
Orlando |
122. Lozano Muñoz, Julio |
29. Bracamonte
Chiringano, Juana |
76. Echevarría Flores, Gumercinda |
123. Luna Aragón,
Elizabeth |
30. Bravo Sarco,
César Augusto |
77. Echevarría Suárez, Ruth Cecilia |
124. Magallan Galoc, Jakeline |
31. Burga Cardozo, Vilma |
78. Elera Molero, Luis |
125. Malpartida Gutierrez, Héctor |
32. Cabanillas Toro, Guadalupe |
79. Erquiñigo
Ramón, Santiago |
126. Marchena
Alva, Jorge |
33. Cabrera
Enríquez, Alfredo |
80. Espinoza
Fernández, Féliz |
127. Margarito
Silva, Manuel |
34. Cajusol Bances, Juan |
81. Eugenio
Centeno, Virginia |
128. Marrugarra
Neyra, Luis |
35. Callirgos
Tarazona, Ricardo |
82. Fernández
Sare, Adolfo |
129. Medina
Ramírez, Sergio Alejandro |
36. Camargo
Matensio, Henry |
83. Ferradas
Nuñez, Pablo Jorge |
130. Meléndez
Saavedra, Inés |
37. Campos
Alarcón, Dana |
84. Flores
Guillén, Lilia Carolina |
131. Menacho
Salas, Aquilino |
38. Cánepa
Campos, Rosa |
85. Flores
Salinas, Javier |
132. Mendoza
Michuy, Manuel |
39. Cárdenas
Pinto, Herver Victor |
86. Gallegos Ramírez, Luz |
133. Molina Ugarte, Noemi |
40. Carranza Rodríguez, Manuel |
87. Galvez Saldaña, Nélida |
134. Montalván Alvarado, César |
41. Carrillo Quiñones, Elizabeth |
88. Ganoza Rivera, Jorge |
135. Montes Pacora, Hugo |
42. Castro Salvatierra, Teodoro |
89. García Huallpa, Ana María |
136. Montes Yacsahuache, Hugo |
43. Ccapali Atoccsa, Irene |
90. García Vergara, Segundo |
137. Montoya Luna, Jaime Jhonny |
44. Ccapali Atoccsa, Zenón |
91. Gimeno Aleman, Cecilia Victoria |
138. Moreno Gonzáles, Margarita |
45. Chala, Sergio Antonio |
92. Gonzáles Castillo, Ricardo |
139. Mujica
Esquivel, Liz |
46. Changanaqui
Chávez, José |
93. Gonzáles Figueroa, Máximo |
140. Muñoz Jesús, Berilda |
47. Chara Pacheco, Luisa |
94. Gonzáles Guillén, Gustavo |
141. Murillo de Díaz, Rosa Isabel |
142. Navarro
Sánchez,
Jorge |
188. Rivera
Martinez, Nelly |
234. Urrunaga
Linares, Victor Manuel |
143. Navarro,
Delano Marcelo |
189. Rodas
Romero, Julio |
235. Valdez
Rivera, Angela |
144. Nizama Zelaya, Víctor |
190. Rodríguez Briones, Johel |
236. Valdez Tellez, Hilda |
145. Núñez Centeno, Victor |
191. Rodriguez Campos, Rommy Cecilia |
237. Valeriano Sebastián, Bonifacio
Ramón |
146. Núñez Morales, Carmen |
192. Rodríguez Espada, Eugenio |
238. Varias Trabanco, Freddy |
147. Ordoñez Quispe, Marco Antonio |
193. Rodríguez Garcia, Elisa |
239. Vásquez Leguía, Oscar |
148. Ore León,
Jorge |
194. Rodríguez Reaño, Vicente Waldo |
240. Vásquez Quesada, Juan |
149. Orrillo-Vásques Torres, Flavia |
195. Rojas Cortez, Victor |
241. Vásquez Quiñones, Soledad |
150. Ortega Martell, Carlos |
196. Rojas Figueroa, Luis |
242. Vásquez Sánches, Fidel |
151. Owada Amado, Oscar |
197. Rojas Vega, Irma |
243. Vega Díaz, Ivan Alex |
152. Pacheco Munayco, Jorge |
198. Roman Toro, Isaías |
244. Velásquez
Machuca, Edgard |
153. Paitán Mauricio, Catalina |
199. Romero Chang, María |
245. Vereau Palma, Cita |
154. Pajares Godoy, Moises |
200. Saavedra Ambrosio, José |
246. Vera Vitoriño, Elizabeth |
155. Paredes Cubas, Rosa |
201. Saavedra Mego, Violeta |
247. Vidal Vidal, Eva |
156. Paredes Cubas, Walter Roberto |
202. Saavedra Vega, Armando |
248. Villar Contreras, José |
157. Páucar Dávila, Rebeca |
203. Salas Sobrino, Frida |
249. Villareal Rodríguez, Hermelinda |
158. Pedreschi de
Berróspi, Graciela |
204. Salazar
Caycho, Eduardo |
250. Villegas
Guerra, Wilburt |
159. Peredo
Cavassa, Alicia |
205. Salazar
Venegas, María |
251. Vizcarra
Zorrilla, Neyda |
160. Peredo
Cavassa, Mario |
206. Salcedo
Olivares, Liduvina |
252. Zapata
Zapata, Rosario |
161. Pérez
Guevara, César |
207. Sánchez
Alarcón, Reyna |
253. Zapata
Espinoza, Elsa Silvia |
162. Pérez Polo,
Rosalía |
208. Sánchez
Campos, Luz |
254. Zavaleta
Saavedra, Carmen |
163. Pereyra
Salazar, Walter |
209. Sánchez
Candia, Raúl |
255. Zegarra
Castro, David Orlando |
164. Pichilingue
Romero, Teresa |
210. Sánchez Lozano, Juan Carlos |
256. Zegarra Zevallos, Segundo |
165. Pilco Guerra, Luisa |
211. Santibañez Velásquez, Oscar |
257. Zumaeta Flores, Ivan |
166. Pizarro Sanchez, Consuelo |
212. Santisteban, Urmeneta, Ronald |
|
167. Pohll Luna, Amelia Rosario |
213. Sarnaqué Vargas, César |
|
168. Polo Castañeda, Agustín Miguel
Arturo |
214. Silva Baca, Elieberto |
|
169. Purizaca Arámbulo,
José |
215. Silva Baca,
Victor |
|
170. Quineche Díaz, María Elena |
216. Silva
Delgado, Iván |
|
171. Quiñónes
Atalaya, Lira |
217. Sipán Guerra, Javier |
|
172. Quiñónes Díaz,
Manuel |
218. Solís Martell, Clemencia |
|
173. Quiñónes Seminario, Pedro |
219. Solís Retuerto,
Wilder |
|
174. Ramírez
Cadenas, Jacinta |
220. Solís Roca,
Eleuterio |
|
175. Ramírez Granados, Margarita |
221. Soria Cañas, Edith |
|
176. Ramírez Rodríguez, Mónica
Emperatriz |
222. Sosa Alvarez, Carmen |
|
177. Ramos de la Cruz, Elmi |
223. Soto Santana, Giovanna Elset |
|
178. Ravello Velásquez, John |
224. Soto Santana, Walter |
|
179. Retuerto
Aranda, Rómulo |
225. Sotomayor Vargas, Rubén Javier |
|
180. Revelo Infante, Ronald Luciano |
226. Talledo Añazco, Luz Angélica |
|
181. Reyes Caballero, Rubén |
227. Torres Hoyo, Lety |
|
182. Ribotte Rodríguez, Roberto |
228. Torres Martínez, Juan |
|
183. Rigaid Arevalo, Julio Antonio |
229. Torres
Prieto, Rolando Alfonso |
|
184. Rivas Cappelletti, Carlos |
230. Uchuya Chacaltana, Leoncio |
|
185. Rivas Chara, Jorge Martín |
231. Ugarte Pierrend, Juana |
|
186. Rivera Delgado, Bertha |
232. Unzueta Medina, Carlos |
|
187. Rivera Loayza, Carmen |
233. Urquiza Alcántara, Ronald |
|